Quantcast

DNA Exonerations Cannot Fix the Death Penalty

Default Image

As of November 2008, 130 people have been exonerated from death row in the United States. DNA testing has resulted in 225 exonerations, mostly in non-capital cases, and these numbers continue to rise. The advent of DNA has helped tremendously in its ability to prove guilt or innocence, and has been instrumental in overturning many wrongful convictions. The thing is, every man and woman who has proven that they were wrongfully convicted will tell you that they are actually the lucky ones. They will tell you that there are others like them who are still in prison – and others like them for whom it is now too late, for they have been executed.  

According to the Innocence Project, “only a fraction of criminal cases involve biological evidence that can be subjected to DNA testing, and even when such evidence exists, it is often lost or destroyed after a conviction. Since they don’t have access to a definitive test like DNA, many wrongfully convicted people have a slim chance of ever proving their innocence.”      

Kirk Bloodsworth was one of the lucky ones. After being wrongfully convicted of the sexual assault and murder of a nine-year-old girl in Maryland, Bloodsworth came close to paying the ultimate price for a horrible crime that he did not commit. He was convicted twice of the murder, and spent almost nine years in prison. Yet he was lucky when, in 1992, the prosecution agreed to a newly developed form of testing called DNA. Bloodsworth went on to become the first capital conviction in the U.S. to be overturned as a result of DNA testing.

In Georgia, a man named Troy Davis currently sits on death row for the murder of a police officer in Savannah – also a horrible crime. Davis’ conviction consisted solely of eyewitness testimony, yet since trial 7 of the 9 eyewitnesses have recanted or contradicted their testimony – casting serious doubt on the evidence that was used to convict him. Despite the strong evidence indicating that he may be innocent, Davis has now faced three execution dates, once coming within 2 hours of death, and remains at risk of execution. Unlike in Bloodsworth’s case, there is no DNA evidence available with which to prove Davis’ guilt or innocence.

DNA exonerations cannot solve the serious problems that clearly exist in our criminal justice system, as illustrated by the case of Troy Davis above. But they do illuminate the need for serious reform within the criminal justice system. Not the least of which is repeal of the death penalty.   

POST YOUR COMMENTS BELOW

Get More:
 

Comments

dudleysharp's picture

Innocents more protected with the death penalty

It is, first, important to get the facts straight, which I assert AI did not.

The 130 (now 138) exonerations from death row is a blatant fraud, easily uncovered by fact checking.

Please review:

"The 130 (now 139) death row 'innocents' scam"
http://homicidesurvivors.com/2009/03/04/fact-checking-issues-on-innocence-and-the-death-penalty.aspx

Secondly, there are always two sides to every debate and with the innocence issue there is as well.

Opposing Views, if you will.

Actual innocents are at risk of being found guilty and being executed. But, so too are innocents more likely to be protected with the death penalty than with life without parole (LWOP).

Enhanced deterrence, enhanced due process and enhanced incapacitation all provide better protection for innocents in death penalty cases than with LWOP.

Please review:

"The Death Penalty: More Protection for Innocents"
http://homicidesurvivors.com/2009/07/05/the-death-penalty-more-protection-for-innocents.aspx

"A Death Penalty Red Herring: The Inanity and Hypocrisy of Perfection", Lester Jackson Ph.D.,
http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=102909A

And, yes, of course, there is another side to the Troy Davis case:

See my reply to AI in the response section:

Dudley Sharp Says: February 4th, 2010 at 5:35 am

Troy Davis: Both sides need to be told
http://blog.amnestyusa.org/deathpenalty/troy-davis-newphew-lends-voice-for-human-rights /

There are numerous cases whereby anti death penalty folks claim innocents have been executed. So far, there is no reasonable case for that actually occurring in the US, at least since 1900.

"The Innocent Executed: Deception & Death Penalty Opponents"
http://homicidesurvivors.com/2009/10/08/the-innocent-executed-deception--death-penalty-opponents--draft.aspx

"Cameron Todd Willingham: Another Media Meltdown", A Collection of Articles
http://homicidesurvivors.com/categories/Cameron %20Todd%20Willingham.aspx

"At the Death House Door" Can Rev. Carroll Pickett be trusted?"
http://homicidesurvivors.com/2009/01/30/fact-checking-is-very-welcome.aspx

And the deterrence debate has heated up, tremendously.

All prospects of a negative outcome deter some. It is a truism. The death penalty, the most severe of criminal sanctions, is the least likely of all criminal sanctions to violate that truism.

25 recent studies finding for deterrence, Criminal Justice Legal Foundation,
http://www.cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DPDeterrence.htm

"Deterrence and the Death Penalty: A Reply to Radelet and Lacock"
http://homicidesurvivors.com/2009/07/02/deterrence-and-the-death-penalty-a-reply-to-radelet-and-lacock.aspx

"Death Penalty, Deterrence & Murder Rates: Let's be clear"
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2009/03/death-penalty-deterrence-murder-rates.html

Close x
Don't Miss Out! |
Like us on Facebook?