DEA Changes Tune: No War on Marijuana Dispensaries
By Kurt A. Gardinier
Chris Bartkowicz was conducting a medical marijuana growing operation in his suburban Denver basement and was so confident that he was complying with state law that he decided to talk to the media, boasting to Denver’s NBC affiliate about the size and success of his operation, saying that he’s “living the dream.”
The next day his dream ended when DEA agents entered his home, placed him under arrest and carried off dozens of black bags full of marijuana plants and growing lights. While some details of this case remain unclear, Jeffrey Sweetin, the DEA special agent in charge of the Denver office, left little ambiguity as to his position. “It’s not medicine,” Sweetin said. “It’s still a violation of federal law [and] we’re still going to continue to investigate and arrest people.”
Sweetin went on to tell the Denver Post that “the time is coming when we go into a dispensary, we find out what their profit is, we seize the building and we arrest everybody.” Sweetin’s comments come just months after a recently announced change in policy by the Obama administration, which said in October that the federal government would respect state laws allowing for the growing and selling of marijuana for medicinal use.
Sweetin’s stance on the issue has seemed to soften a bit. He told the Denver Westword yesterday that the DEA is “not declaring war on dispensaries.” He went on to say, with an apparent laugh, “If we were declaring war on dispensaries, they would not be hard to find. You can’t swing a dead cat around here without hitting thirty of them.” Apparently someone with the Obama administration has updated Mr. Sweetin with its new policy.
Meanwhile, Chris Bartkowicz has been formally charged with “possession with intent to manufacture, distribute or dispense 224 marijuana plants ” — a crime that could put him behind bars for five to forty years and cost him up to $2 million in fines.

Until the laws on marijuana are changed and marijuana is removed as a schedule 1 drug,to any other schedule,the DEA is doing what he is sworn to do,within the law . He may get a slap on the wrist but the US District Attorney is preparing charges .
Without the removal of marijuana from schedule 1,the DEA is required to say that marijuana is not medicine ,regardless of clinical
proof or how many doctors and patients are using it as medicine.
Even though the US government has been furnishing marijuana to treat glaucoma for the last 35 years and are still doing it today.
Any time that a federal bureaucracy is required by a congressional mandate to take any actions "necessary" to keep marijuana illegal ,
where does the truth start and the leis end?
That congress would write a mandate that requires any government
agency to lie to US citizens,there is something unconstitutional about that and morally wrong .
Go to http://www.theweedblog.com to get a full analysis of this case. There might be a change in 'tone,' but the actions on the ground will remain the same i'd imagine.