Congress Must Make Smart Choices for U.S. Energy Future
According to an assessment by the International Energy Agency (IEA), the world is going to invest more than $16 trillion in energy by 2030.
There are two ways that we can invest this money: a smart way and a dumb way. If we invest wisely, we will move America to a new clean energy future that makes us a leader for the 21 century. But if we stumble and invest in an unwise way - focusing on old, dirty technologies and fossil fuels - we will end up being left behind.
As two new reports released today show, America can benefit greatly from significant energy investments in clean energy-if we are smart. If we are smart, we will create millions of new jobs, increase our energy independence, and protect the planet from global warming pollution. And these will be opportunities for people across all income and education levels - with even more opportunities for advancement.
If we are smart, we will use this investment to increase our energy efficiency - through weatherization and retrofits. This will save consumers on their utility bills.
If we are smart, we will increase people's access to public transportation thereby lowering people's living expenses.
For too long, we've looked at economic opportunity and protecting the environment as being in conflict with each other. But, this view is at odds with the growing body of evidence that demonstrates we can strengthen our economy and fight global warming. We can shift to clean energy, protect the planet and create new opportunities for families - and we can do this all at the same time.
Today, NRDC is helping to release two major reports from the Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst (PERI). One is co-authored by NRDC and Green For All. The other is a complementary report by PERI and the Center for American Progress (CAP).
The NRDC/Green For All report, called "Green Prosperity: How Clean-Energy Policies Can Fight Poverty and Raise Living Standards in the United States," shows that shifting from traditional fossil fuel to clean energy will improve the standard of living for millions of Americans across all skill and education levels, especially among lower-income families. Nearly half of the 1.7 million new jobs created by a $150 billion clean energy investment will be accessible to workers with relatively low levels of formal education. Of these, nearly 75 percent will have high potential for advancement. Plus, there will be additional opportunities to lower monthly energy and transportation costs.
The other report, "The Economic Benefits of Investing in Clean Energy" presents a broader view - showing how the combination of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) and the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES) could serve as the foundation for bringing total clean-energy investments in the United States to approximately $150 billion per year, creating 1.7 million jobs. That kind of growth would create nearly a 1 percent drop in the national unemployment rate.
And what about the concerns that we sometimes hear that low-income Americans would be left behind if our nation addresses climate change?
It turns out that's just not true. The NRDC/Green For All report concludes that half of the net new jobs created by clean-energy investment will be accessible to workers with relatively low levels of formal education. (You can learn more about clean energy jobs at http://www.nrdc.org/energy/greenjobs/ .)
What's particularly significant about the types of jobs created by clean energy is that compared to fossil-fuel energy jobs there is a much greater opportunity for upward advancement. Three out of every four clean-energy jobs are accessible to people with just a high-school education are upwardly mobile jobs, meaning they provide the opportunity for advancement and higher income, giving people the power to lift themselves out of poverty.
Consider these additional findings:
--Major investments in clean energy will mean significant improvements in energy efficiency in buildings and homes, lowering overall energy costs for consumers, especially for lower-income households. These savings could be as high as 4 percent of household incomes for some families.
--New investments in clean energy will also boost public transportation, especially in urban areas with disproportionately-large populations of lower-income families. Increased investment in public transportation could lead to an average reduction in living costs of 1 to 4 percent per family.
Now we just have to sure to make the right choices to make those green jobs and other benefits for lower-income Americans happen. And America may soon have this opportunity with the clean energy and climate legislation currently moving trough Congress.
The American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES), that is moving through the House, is likely to be an extremely important driver of the clean energy investments that American needs. While the bill is not perfect, we need to move forward with this legislation to ensure that we can shift to clean energy future that will deliver millions of new jobs, cut global warming pollution and create new opportunities.
Now is the time for leaders in Congress to move America in a new direction. Now is the time for leaders to make smart choices for all Americans.















Congress Must Make Smart Choices for U.S. Energy Future
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
That's all well and good, but...
The problem with energy is the way that we consume it, not necessarily the substances that we use to generate it. In truth, we cannot sustain our consumption levels, there aren't enough resources in the world of any kind. As our own society grows larger and more connected and the world rapidly follows suit, how will we meet a geometrically expanding demand for electricity?
We also haven't considered what to do about fueling planes once we've run out of petrol-products. Revert to airships perhaps? Long distance travel across land would have been dealt with if we'd maintained our rail infrastructure, but now it would require a complete overhaul, burning more fossil fuels in the process. What about refrigeration units for ships and trucks and trains? How are we going to meet those huge energy demands?
The problem here is that people are looking for a silver bullet technology that may not exist. The reason that gasoline and other petroleum products are so popular as fuel is because they do their job better than any other product that is available to us. The problem is not the use of petrol products and fossil fuels but the rate that we consume them. Anything that burns, or breathes, produces CO2 and nothing is wrong with that, plants use it in photosynthesis. The world is built to have CO2 in the atmosphere. We're just putting up much more than people think we should.
I don't know if humanity is to blame for the recent uptick in global temperatures, but I am inclined to disbelieve that idea. I do however believe that we are wasting one of the best, non-renewable fuels that we, as a species, have access to. We need to learn to live with less energy, using as little as possible. Not only will this help our environment , but it will lead to a lifestyle that can incorporate high technology but be indefinitely sustainable. Could there be a better legacy to leave than that?
- ReyMostaza
June 22, 2009 8:40AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review some comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.