Brady Releases Gun Control Scorecard
Most Scores Remain Low Despite Renewed Push For Stronger Gun Laws
To read the full state by state ranking, click here.
Washington
-– Most states have weak or non-existent gun laws that help feed the illegal gun market, allow the sale of guns without Brady background checks and put families and children at risk, according to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. But more and more states are pushing legislation to strengthen their gun laws. The organization’s 2008 state scorecards, which rate each state on the strength of its gun laws, are being released today for all 50 states.
“Once again, the scores for most states are abysmal. Most people don’t realize how few laws we have on the books restricting easy access to guns. As a result, we continue to make it too easy for dangerous people to get dangerous weapons,” says Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign. “We need tougher federal laws, but action at the state level can halt gun violence and pave the way for common sense federal gun laws.”
No states got a better score for 2008 than for 2007. Five states saw their scores drop: Florida, Georgia and Louisiana for passing laws forcing employers to allow employees to bring guns into workplace parking lots, and two states, West Virginia and Wyoming, for passing so-called “Shoot First” laws that authorize deadly force in public against a perceived threat even if ways to avoid the threat are available.
The scores range from a mere two points out of a hundred – in Kentucky, Louisiana and Oklahoma – to a score of 79 for California. Other high scores include those for Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey and New York.
The Brady Campaign is seeing a marked increase in the number of states pushing for stronger gun laws. State lawmakers across the country are ramping up efforts to pass new legislation on gun violence prevention, following nearly a decade during which gun advocates dominated state houses. Much of the proposed legislation focuses on cutting off easy gun access to convicted criminals and the dangerously mentally ill and on improving methods to trace guns used in crimes.
Last year, the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence identified 52 bills it considers a priority for passage in 22 states, compared with 30 such bills two years ago. The Brady Campaign expects even more states to make the push for stronger gun laws during 2009 state legislative sessions. In sharp contrast, the gun lobby proposals to force guns on college campuses and in the workplace are being met with limited or little success. Last year, the NRA lost in all 17 states where they introduced legislation to force guns on college campuses. It is presumed that the gun lobby will again try to push both pieces of legislation.
The Brady Scorecards are designed so that states can score up to 100 points across five major categories of laws: Curbing Firearm Trafficking; Strengthening Brady Background Checks; Child Safety; Banning Military-style Assault Weapons; and making it harder to carry Guns In Public Places. The national state-by-state scores are available in complete category-by-category detail at www.bradycampaign.org.
Weak state gun laws create a dangerous combination of risk: they don’t require Brady background checks for every gun purchase and they don’t take other actions to effectively combat gun trafficking. For example, states like Arizona, Kansas, Florida, Missouri and Texas don’t check the background of every gun purchaser, thus making it easier for felons and other prohibited purchasers to get guns, and they also have no laws on the books to effectively combat trafficking in illegal guns. As a result, they make it a lot easier for dangerous people to access guns.
The categories covered by the 2008 scorecards are as follows:
* States can earn up to 35 points by taking all measures needed to “Curb Firearm Trafficking.” States can fully regulate the gun dealers within their borders, limit bulk purchases of handguns, provide police certain technology to identify crime guns, and require lost or stolen guns to be reported to the police.
* States can earn up to 25 points by “Strengthening Brady Background Checks.” This involves requiring background checks on all gun sales and requiring a permit in order to purchase firearms. Short of universal background checks, states can also close the gun show loophole, at least requiring background checks for all gun show sales.
* States can earn up to 20 points by “Protecting Child Safety” when it comes to guns. States can require that only childproof handguns be sold within their borders, require child safety locks to be sold with each handgun, hold adults accountable for keeping guns away from kids and teens, and require handgun purchasers to be at least 21 years of age.
* States can earn up to 10 points by “Banning Military-style Assault Weapons,” as well as banning high-capacity ammunition magazines.
* States can earn up to 10 points by making it harder to carry “Guns In Public Places” (except for trained law enforcement and security) and by allowing localities to “Preserve Local Control” over municipal gun laws. This includes keeping guns out of workplaces and college campuses, not forcing law enforcement to issue concealed handgun permits on demand, not permitting “shoot first” expansions in self-defense laws, and not preventing municipalities from passing their own gun laws.
Acknowledgements and thanks go to the Legal Community Against Violence for their research on state gun laws. Their publication, “Regulating Guns in America,” and website served as a basis for these scorings. For more information about Legal Community Against Violence, see www.lcav.org.
Editor's Note: To read the NRA's response to the new Brady scorecard, click here.
POST YOUR COMMENTS BELOW











Brady Releases Gun Control Scorecard
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Thanks for reminding me...
I need to update my forum signature picture with a new brady scorecard. I am proud to say my state, Arizona, scores a "6" on the Brady tyranny scorecard. I have a concealed carry permit My state recognizes my rights and I, in good faith, have never so much thought about breaking a single law. The fact that the Brady Campaign wants to restrict the freedoms of law abiding gun owners only proves how dangerous and disconnected they are.
Lets take a look at how a state scores to brady versus their murder rates per 1000 people.
Limited Gun Control
Arizona
Murders per 1000 People in 2005: 0.6
Brady Score : 6/100
Kentucky
Murders per 1000 People in 2005: 0.4
Brady Score: 2/100
Missouri
Murders per 1000 People in 2005: 0.6
Brady Score: 4/100
New Mexico
Murders per 1000 People in 2005: 0.2
Brady Score: 6/100
Oklahoma
Murders per 1000 People in 2005: 0.4
Brady Score: 2/100
Utah
Murders per 1000 People in 2005: 0.3
Brady Score: 4/100
Tyrannical Gun Control
California
Murders per 1000 People in 2005: 3.6
Brady Score : 79/100
New Jersey
Murders per 1000 People in 2005: 0.9
Brady Score : 63/100
Connecticut
Murders per 1000 People in 2005: 0.4
Brady Score : 54/100
Massachusetts
Murders per 1000 People in 2005: 0.6
Brady Score : 54/100
Maryland
Murders per 1000 People in 2005: 0.6
Brady Score : 53/100
Also, New Hampshire, The Safest state in the Union.
Murders per 1000 People in 2005: 0.1
Brady Score : 11/100
So, you are just as or more likely to be murdered in a state that the Brady campaign gives the rubber stamp. The lower a state scores on the Brady list, the more reasonable it is to assume you'll be safe.
When is this nation going to realize that the most important factor in curbing violent crime is the strength of the family unit. When you rely on television and popular culture to raise your child you are setting them up for a difficult life. If you don't know where your child is or what he is doing you, and not your neighbor's pistol, are the problem. I mentored low income children with the salvation army for three years. The kids with the worst behavioral problems were the ones who's parents couldn't be bothered to drop them off, pick them up, or show up for events. If you donate to the Brady Campaign I'd seriously consider funneling that money into after school programs, youth groups, and head start.
- Born2Hike
February 9, 2009 2:24AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Statistics can lie
Allow me to preface this by stating that I am a supporter of Second Amendment rights and am a holder of a CHL in Texas.
On both sides of the fence, statistics can be swayed to prove a point. While Brady is well known for the use of their scorecard to ranks states and then twist that data to suit their needs, the information you posted is just as tainted.
First, you looked at MURDER rates as a whole and did not constrain your data to firearm related murders.
Second, your data looks suspicious in that your numbers are based on 1000 population, something that I have not been able to find a direct correlation to in a brief search of the Internet. Most of the statistics I found were for 100,000 population.
I would be interested to see the source of your information.
- justabiker
February 9, 2009 8:30PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Allow me to source my information.
It is a standard practice in statistics to reduce population density versus occurrences into 1000, 10,000, or 100,000, It does not affect actual ratio of census figures to violent crime. This is done both to save space and make the data into something that can be correlated between localities.
Sources
http://recordsproject.com/court /
They collect and collate census, court, and criminal records. They list all crimes, not just murders, I felt it prudent to list murder since the brady campaign seems only to be concerned with deaths and not rape, burglary, or auto theft.
http://www.bradycampaign.org/media/release.php?release=962
Brady Campaign lists the states with highest and lowest scores in their overview of their 2008 rankings media release.
- Born2Hike
February 10, 2009 7:30AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
correlation vs causation
First, you may have cherry picked. For example, you didn't use VA.
Second, your own logic gives the opposite answer if we look at other countries in europe for example. They have far more strict rules than all US states and far far lower murder rates.
- reckoner
February 13, 2009 12:17PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Reading Comprehension and Retention
I used the states noted for high and low performance in the Brady article. If you actually read my comment or the news release you would know that. If you want a state by state comparison you are welcome to do one yourself, I do not have the time nor the inclination to waste a good Friday.
Since you mention Europe may I use the example of Switzerland where firearm ownership is compulsory for military age men? Where Handgun licenses are issued by the government on a "must issue" basis and rifles are not even registered? Where 1.2 - 3 million firearms are in private circulation and 14% of households have a handgun. Switzerland must be a very dangerous place yeah? Oh no, it has a murder rate of 0.00921351 per 1,000 people , that's terr... wait? what? Lower than the UK, Spain, Germany, and the rest of Europe? Every requirement and regulation in Switzerland is acceptable in my eyes and would not change my capacity or ability to own, shoot, or carry.
Sourcing for murder statistic
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_mur_percap-crime-murders-per-capita
- Born2Hike
February 13, 2009 6:42PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
strawmen tell no tales
You are arguing against a strawman. I never suggested that gun ownership leads to "a dangerous place". What I did say is that strict gun laws do not lead to more crime as you suggest and gave most of europe as an example. You seem intent on cherry picking the places that fit your desires and ignoring the places that don't.
- reckoner
February 14, 2009 10:13PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Ugh
I believe your assertion about gun control having no effect on crime rates is incorrect. I'll endeavor to not "pick cherries" though in both cases I believe I haven't. 1) Please read brady news release and compare it to the states I mentioned, Same states no more, no less. I subtracted now inconvenient states 2) You stated Europe has strict gun control laws, which is not universaly true. I just wanted to correct what seems to be a general misconception.
Two countries that I can think of where gun control has had little effect on crime are Australia and Canada. The UK ,however, has seen a sharp increase in assaults and home invasions. In fact, the UK outpaces the US in all crime statistics except murder and rape. Before you quote erroneous figures please read this article from dialymail.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1079927/Violent-crime-22-Home-Office-admits-police-recording-offences-years.html
I'm just going to end this now. I don't believe I can appease you unless I write a book on gun control and detail every crime in every locality. I'll just say that we both agree that guns don't have much of an effect on crime statistics. My first comment ended with my view that it's family strength and not guns that influence crime rates. Yes yes, I know I just committed the sin of argumentum ad antiquitatem. oh shoot, I just committed the red herring. I'm going to move on, this horse looks pretty dead to me. Feel free to continue.
- Born2Hike
February 15, 2009 2:04AM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
still cherry picking
I've lived in europe. Germany for example has very strict gun control ocmpared to the US. They have far far lower murder rates. You've continued to ignore such places.
- reckoner
February 15, 2009 7:43PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Isn't it ironic and amusing...
Compare the polls in the right sidebar with the author's assertions (NEWS: Brady Releases Gun Control ScorecardBy The Brady Campaign , To Prevent Gun Violence - February 08, 2009). I'm amused and bemused at the same time.
- spot2112
February 9, 2009 3:48PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.