Brady Campaign Says Weak U.S. Gun Laws Fueling Mexican Violence
The Mexican drug war has received much attention recently in the media. The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence prepared this paper to assist journalists who have asked about U.S. gun laws and the role they play in the ongoing violence.
Mexico’s escalating gun war with well-armed drug cartels has killed thousands of police, government officials, and ordinary citizens, and threatens the stability of the Mexican government. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, and President Obama have recognized that helping stem the violence in Mexico is of urgent national — and international — importance. American gun sellers supply the cartels with virtually all of their guns — between 95 and 100 percent. Recently, Mexico’s drug war has begun to wreak havoc in the U.S.
While the crisis has been much discussed in the media and in Washington, there has been little mention of the elephant in the room: the Mexican drug cartels are arming themselves here because the U.S. makes it too easy for criminals and traffickers to get guns. Mexican Attorney General Eduardo Medina Mora correctly called American gun laws “absurd.”
Two crucial points need to be in the spotlight in media coverage and policy responses to the crisis:
1) To stem the violence in Mexico, we need to prevent criminals and traffickers from buying guns in the U.S. by plugging loopholes in our gun laws and strengthening law enforcement’s ability to crack down on corrupt gun dealers. This crisis is not happening because our border is loose; it is happening because our gun laws allow unlicensed sellers to sell guns without Brady background checks, military-style assault weapons to be freely sold, and corrupt dealers to thrive. Making our borders less porous will take years, and will not stop the imminent Mexican crisis.
2) The same legal loopholes and corrupt gun sellers who arm Mexican criminals also arm American criminals. While we should heed the call of Mexican officials to help stop the violence there, we also should heed the call of the majority of Americans who want to stop the violence in their communities.
Loopholes in Our Gun Laws Enable Mexican Drug Cartels To Obtain Deadly Weapons
Mexican criminals can’t get guns in Mexico because the gun laws in Mexico, like those in most industrialized nations, do not allow a vast unregulated gun market, in which military-style weapons and all manner of guns are easily available to be purchased in unlimited quantity without a background check. Stymied by Mexico’s tough gun laws, the drug lords and the traffickers who supply them come to the U.S. to take advantage of our gun laws’ gaping loopholes:
* No Background Check Sales: Federal law allows guns to be sold by unlicensed sellers without Brady background checks. ATF has found that “no background check” sales are a major source for supplying dangerous people with guns. Investigations of gun shows have found that unlicensed sellers have trafficked thousands of guns without background checks, making them the second most prominent source of illegal gun trafficking. Mexican drug cartels are exploiting this loophole, buying guns in “no background check” sales at gun shows or other private venues.
* Military-style Assault Weapons: Federal law in the U.S. allows civilians to purchase military style assault weapons, as well as military surplus .50 caliber sniper rifles that can shoot through armored vehicles and bring down airplanes. Mexican law enforcement is increasingly being out-gunned by drug gangs bearing military-style weapons. Mexico Attorney General Medina Mora has said that before the U.S. assault weapons ban was allowed to expire, only 21 percent of the weapons Mexico seized from traffickers were assault rifles, while today, it is more than half. For example, a Bushmaster carbine, a civilian version of the M-16 assault rifle, bought in Houston was used by drug gangsters disguised as soldiers to massacre four police officers and three secretaries in the “2007 Acapulco Massacre.”
* Bulk Sales: Federal law does not limit the number of guns a purchaser can buy at a time – the only limit is the buyer’s ability to pay for them. This enables gun traffickers to buy guns in bulk, and/or buy guns repeatedly from the same store. For example, between January and November 2003, Adan Rodriguez purchased more than 150 guns for Mexican drug gangs, returning repeatedly to Ammo Depot in Mesquite, Texas. One of the guns he sold was connected to the shooting of a police officer in Reynosa.
* Restrictions on law enforcement: Only one percent of federally licensed firearms dealers are responsible for nearly 60 percent of guns traced to crime in the U.S.,8 and many of the guns trafficked to Mexico are also sold by gun dealers who are at worst corrupt, at best, willfully indifferent when they sell guns to straw purchasers.9 Yet federal law makes it too hard for law enforcement to crack down on corrupt gun dealers. For example, ATF is limited to one spot inspection per year, and the standard of proof for license revocations is difficult to meet. Riders attached annually to Justice Department appropriations legislation since 2004, known as the Tiahrt Amendment, prohibit ATF from requiring gun dealer inventory audits, restrict disclosure of crime gun data, and require the destruction of Brady Background Records after 24 hours. These restrictions make it harder for law enforcement to investigate corrupt dealers.
The Loopholes That Arm Mexican Cartels Are Also Killing Americans
Just as criminals in Mexico find it necessary to go to the U.S. to get guns, American criminals get a disproportionate share of their guns from states with weak gun laws. For example, states that require permits for handgun sales export a third of the crime guns as states with no such requirement. States like Texas, that allow gun sales without background checks export crime guns on average at about twice the rate of states that have closed the gun show loophole. Texas leads the nation as the primary source of guns for drug cartels and Texas dealers are the third highest supplier of interstate
crime guns in the U.S. The states with the highest rate of supplying crime guns to other states all have weak gun laws. States with weak gun laws also supply a larger percentage of in-state criminals with guns – because criminals do not need to travel to get guns.
Current Proposals Are Insufficient to Stem The Violence in Mexico – or America
In response to the Mexican crisis, legislation has been introduced to expand resources for ATF to crack down on firearms trafficking across the border,16 and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has called for reinstatement of an assault weapons ban. While these proposals are positive steps, they alone will not be sufficient to stem the gun crisis in Mexico, or in the United States.
In formulating a policy to stem the flow of guns to Mexico, policymakers must focus on the fundamental problem – that our laws in the U.S. make it far too easy for criminals to obtain guns. We need to require Brady background checks for all gun sales. We should not allow the purchases of unlimited numbers of guns at one time to anyone with a high credit card limit. We should strengthen ATF’s legal authority to crack down on corrupt gun dealers.
While we respond to the gun violence crisis in Mexico, we should also respond to the gun violence crisis here at home. The United States suffers more than 30,000 deaths and more than 70,000 injuries due to gun violence every year.18 Estimates of direct medical expenses for firearm injuries range from $2.3 billion19 to $4 billion per year in the U.S., nearly 50% of which is covered by taxpayers. By strengthening our federal gun laws, we can start preventing criminals in Mexico and the U.S. from acquiring guns.
To read a complete list of footnotes and citations for this article, click here.
POST YOUR COMMENTS BELOW

ABC news has photos and videos of the " assault weapons " used by the Mexican gangs (and their military). In this case, the anti-gun media got it right,showing full auto machine guns . None of those were covered under the previous ban, and are unobtainable by the "ordinary" citizen. The previous ban covered semi auto only, and not the full auto used by the gangs and military. The quantities involved makes individual conversions impractical. Their source of full auto assault weapons brought in from the U.S. is those shipped from the U.S. govt to the corrupt Mexican govt. Half of their military is on the drug cartel payroll.
For the uninformed, it is good justification for The Brady Campaign To Prevent Gun Violence Against Criminals to push for his new bans. You will notice that the Brady Campaign/Handgun/all-gun Control always lies to lawmakers when pushing for legislation that affects only law abiding citizens, which always protects criminals. None of their legislation increases penalties on criminals and gangs using guns in the commission of a crime .
Perhaps the Brady gun banners could go to Mexico, and show them how to improve their inadequate gun ban, and how peaceful their country could become, just like all the other dictator run countries with gun bans.
And call everything a crisis.
If you look at my web site, http://rideronthestorm-armed.angelfire.com / , you will find a comparison of Brady Campaign state gun control grades vs FBI violent crime in that state. The long and short is that the grades have no correlation with violent crime. Strict gun control didn't reduce crime, weak gun control didn't increase it either.
"sold by unlicensed sellers", unlicensed dealers are very, very, illegal, subject to serious federal prison time. Either BATF is ignoring the problem, fat chance, or that statement is a lie. As to Military type firearms, we are NOT ALLOWED to buy or sell Military firearms. We are only allowed castrated copies without full auto capability. That's not what the media describes as used by drug cartels in Mexico. It is silly to think rich drug cartels that move around tons of drugs can't just buy some AK-47's or AKM's from the same source. Just how dumb do they think we are???
Let's see if I got the argument correct. If we ban AR-15s, 50cals, and limit the sale to one gun a month, on this side of the border, the Mexican police will be more on an even battlefield with the drug cartels.
The Mexican police carry full auto weapons, they have 50cals, and they are supplied, trained, and paid by the US government to stop the drugs from coming over the border. They get the latest surveillance, intelligence, high-tech everything from the US government and they can't make a dent in the drug trafficking. And, they can't kill or capture any drug cartel principals.
It's obvious to me that the drug cartels are using all the high-tech gear and expertise for themselves, supplied to the Mexican police/army, by the US government. This campaign to ban firearms is nothing more than a red herring.
Governments have declared war on substance manufacture and trade and use violence to enforce their views regarding these issues. Is there any wonder those who disagree resort to armaments to argue their viewpoint? What governments ought to "declare war" on is physical violence and back off entirely on their opposition to what would otherwise simply be another marketplace operating side by side with the sale of automobiles or shoes or hamburgers. A governments only legitimate function is to guarantee that relationships between human beings remain respectful and reasonable. Dictating personal use of one substance or another is NOT a legitimate function of any government and the blame for the very costly "drug war" rests squarely on the shoulders of governments who unjustly interfere in personal choices that do not involve fraud or physical violence toward others.
The problem here isn't gun laws but rather the continually reinforced example that violence is an appropriate means of persuasion between human beings pretending to civilization. Give a human being reason to believe a gun is their only option and you both become responsible for the violence that results. The man or woman smoking a joint, snorting the coke or shooting up the heroin into their own bodies has the high moral ground to the police officer who would resort to violence to stop them. If the dealer or user is forcing use onto another, only then does the police officer have the duty to prevent such behavior. Private gun ownership becomes a necessity only in the event government cannot or will not perform its duties to prevent or put a stop to physical violence. Because government in the United States derives its rights from the people themselves, said government cannot have a right not also possessed by the people. The right of private gun ownership is necessarily a protected right, otherwise, U.S. government also cannot justify government possession of arms. Of course, as I alluded to, the primary reason for the right to private possession of weapons is that the people be properly equipped to depose their own government which has ceased to function in their best interest.
"... Dictating personal use of one substance or another is NOT a legitimate function of any government..." and "...government in the United States derives its rights..."
The same case can be made for seatbelt laws and a myriad of other intrusions. Government does not have any rights at all: it has delegated powers. This is a very important distinction. A right is a human practice recognized by all in society to be normal and good. Given no wrong doing, as recognized by society, in any direct conflict between law and a right, the law is subservient. How the right may be employed can be regulated, but not the actual practice itself. Freedom of speech is an excellent example. You may declare your opinion(s) to the world. Inciting a riot is not a recognized part of stating your declarations.
"...A governments only legitimate function is to guarantee that relationships between human beings remain respectful and reasonable..."
A government's only legitimate functions are: perform those functions which the individual members of society find onerous or impossible to perform individually, protect that society from foreign aggression, deal directly with foreign powers, enforce the laws created.
These points may seem theoretical, but they have real meaning in just how far government should go in creating law, enforcement of law, and the methods used in enforcement of law.
"...If the dealer or user is forcing use onto another, only then does the police officer have the duty to prevent such behavior..."
Not necessarily; government has created law to oppose such activity. Since voluntary use is not recognized by law, the police have a duty to enforce that law. Change the law.
Are you kidding me. Lets poll all the criminals with guns and see where they "BOUGHT" them! yeah, from my closet a few years ago, and from all the other robberies in this country. People are sooo stupid to think that Mexican drug dealers are walking accross the border, into gun shows, and then walking back accross the border with legally purchased guns fro the US! If you actually believe that, you should not have the righ to vote in my country...plain and simple! Just like we are gonna spend our way out of this economic disaster. my favorite saying this year is...." you stupid, stupid Americans...you will now get what you deserve!"
"...The fastest and easiest way to enslave a nation...is to disarm them."
George Mason
It's not weak U.S. gun laws that are fueling the violence, it is our strict drug laws. By creating a black market for drugs, it is enabling criminals to get rich just as alcohol prohibition did in the U.S. Violence inevitably ensues. The real solution is to legalize the drug trade.
Here's the deal. Obama and Congress are coming after our guns. This madness in Mexico is the opening they have been looking for. Question is: are we going to sit still for it? At some point this ongoing struggle between us and them is going to get real nasty.It won't be settled in court.
There is no basis in fact here. There are tough drug laws and nothing stops the drugs. Automatic weapons are more prevalent in third world countries than in the US and easier to smuggle. Look at the Arabic world. Those aren't BB guns those guys are shooting in the air every time there's a celebration.