Brady Campaign Says Ensign Amendment Would Endanger Public

| by Brady Campaign

The Ensign amendment to the D.C. House Voting Rights Act of 2009, S.160, is a dangerous attempt to repeal D.C. gun laws that would go far beyond authorizing gun possession for self-defense in the home, and instead create serious threats to public safety and homeland security.

While the gun lobby claims this amendment is needed to restore Second Amendment rights in D.C., the District’s laws have already been rewritten to comply with the Supreme Court’s Second Amendment decision in D.C. v. Heller.  Under current D.C. law, residents have the right to possess semiautomatic handguns and use firearms in self-defense in their homes.  D.C. no longer bans handguns in the home, which was struck down in Heller.  Yet the Ensign amendment would eliminate many common sense laws that Justice Scalia stated are “presumptively lawful” in his Heller opinion.

This amendment would undermine federal anti-trafficking laws, repeal D.C.’s ban on dangerous military-style weapons, allow teenagers to possess semiautomatic assault rifles, and prohibit D.C. from passing laws that could “discourage” gun possession or use, even by felons, children or other dangerous persons.  At a time when terrorists continue to look for ways to attack our nation, this amendment would be reckless and irresponsible.  The Senate should reject this amendment.


•    Undermines federal anti-trafficking laws - The amendment would
allow D.C. residents to cross state lines to buy handguns in neighboring states, undermining federal anti-trafficking laws (§10).  For decades, federal law has barred gun dealers from selling handguns directly to out of state buyers (other than licensed dealers) because of the high risk this creates for interstate gun trafficking (18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(3)).

This means that gun traffickers could more easily obtain large quantities of guns outside D.C. to illegally distribute to criminals in D.C.

•    Prohibits D.C. from enacting common sense gun laws - The
amendment would bar D.C. from passing any law that would “prohibit, constructively prohibit, or unduly burden” gun ownership by anyone not barred by already weak federal gun laws (§ 3).  It would even bar D.C. from enacting laws or regulations that may “discourage” private gun ownership or use, even by felons, children or other dangerous persons (Id.).  This amendment would prohibit even basic safe storage requirements.  D.C. could not pass laws requiring shooting proficiency to use a gun, educating parents of the dangers to children of guns in the home, or even restricting teenage gang members without criminal records from possessing assault rifles.

•    Repeals D.C.’s ban on dangerous, military-style weapons - The amendment repeals D.C.’s ban on .50 caliber sniper rifles that can pierce armor plating up to a mile away and its ban on dangerous military-style semiautomatic assault weapons and high capacity ammunition magazines (§ 11).

•    Repeals laws that help solve gun crimes - The amendment
repeals D.C.’s requirements, modeled on a California law strongly supported by law enforcement, that semiautomatic pistols manufactured after January 1, 2011, be microstamp-ready.  Microstamping is a proven law enforcement tool that helps solve gun crimes by imprinting shell casings with a unique identifier so that they can quickly be matched to the handguns that fired them (§ 11).

•    Repeals common sense restrictions on gun possession by dangerous
or unqualified persons
- The amendment repeals common sense restrictions on gun possession in D.C. including:

o    repealing the prohibition on most persons under age 21 from
possessing firearms (§ 5(b)(1)).  It replaces current D.C. law with weaker federal limits that only bar anyone under 18 from possessing handguns (18 U.S.C.  §922(x)).  Current D.C. law bars the registration of firearms by anyone under 21 without parental consent, but this amendment repeals D.C.’s registration requirement, and by doing so it repeals all age limits for the possession of long guns, including assault rifles.

o    repealing the prohibition on gun possession by anyone who has
committed a violent crime or recent drug crime (§ 5(b)(1)).  It replaces this current D.C. law with the weaker federal ban that allows gun possession by many persons who have committed violent or drug-related misdemeanor crimes unrelated to domestic violence.

o    repealing the prohibition on gun possession by anyone
voluntarily committed to a mental institution in the last 5 years (unless they have a doctor’s certification) (§ 5(b)(1)).  It replaces this current D.C. law with the weaker federal ban that allows many persons who are dangerously mentally ill to obtain firearms.

o    repealing the prohibition in D.C. law on gun possession by
anyone who does not pass a vision test, including if they are blind (§ 5(b)(1)).  D.C. would be barred from having any vision requirement for gun use.

•    Repeals registration requirements for firearms - The amendment
would repeal even the most basic gun registration requirements (§ 5).
This means police could no longer easily trace crime guns by tracing them to their registered owner.

•    Repeals safe storage laws - D.C. recently passed legislation
allowing guns to be stored unlocked and loaded unless the owner knows a child is likely to access them.  The amendment would repeal safe storage requirements and prohibit D.C. from enacting new safe storage laws, even though every major gun maker recommends that guns be kept unloaded and locked (§§ 3, 7).  This means that D.C. could not prohibit people from storing loaded firearms near children, posing an extreme danger to the safety of D.C. families.

Read the Gun Owners of America's support of the Ensign amendment, "Support of Ensign Bill is Vital to Ending D.C. Gun Ban"