Beck, Palin, Limbaugh: 3 Stooges of "Peaceful" Insurrection
Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh say that neither they, nor Sarah Palin, had any influence on Jared Loughner's decision to commit the heinous killings in Tucson on Saturday. That could, indeed, turn out to be the case after the investigation is complete. However, that still doesn't mean that these three stooges aren't accidentally steering America towards another, second, bloody insurrection.
In 1776, in the midst of the American Revolution, Thomas Paine wrote a pamphlet titled "Common Sense". That pamphlet is largely credited with not only influencing a major increase in recruitment to the Continental Army, but also with motivating those troops to win the critical battles that that army would soon face. It was an armed conflict. It was a bloody conflict. "Common Sense" helped America win that "armed" and "bloody" conflict.
In June 2009, along comes Glenn Beck, just six months after the first African-American President is elected, re-writing a revisionist, modernized version of Paine's pamphlet, titled "Glenn Beck's Common Sense: The Case Against an Out-of-Control Government, Inspired by Thomas Paine".
Even though I have never read Beck's version of "Common Sense", I consider it to be the most incendiary, violence influencing book of the 21st century. Why? Because about 300 million Americans, just like me, haven't read it. All they know is that the GOP thinks that Glenn Beck is an honest man, and that Glenn Beck says America's government, under the first black president, is "out-of-control". Thomas Paine's version was a call to arms. Now, in modern times, Beck writes a revisionist version that coincides with a tour, with Sarah Palin, called the "Take Our Country Back Tour!"
"Is Glenn Beck sending us a secret coded message," the GOP must be asking itself, "is it time to mount our bayonets?"
Speaking of Sarah Palin, how about those non-incendiary 2010 midterm election surveyor maps?
The Palin camp swears that they weren't meant to be target symbols. They were meant to be surveyor symbols, they claim. But, look what Sarah twittered on March 23, 2010, just one week before the maps went public.
"Commonsense Conservatives & lovers of America: "Don't Retreat, Instead - RELOAD!" Pls see my Facebook page."
Palin might have made that excuse work, had she not Twittered this 8 months later on November 4, 2010,
"Remember months ago "bullseye" icon used 2 target the 20 Obamacare-lovin' incumbent seats? We won 18 out of 20 (90% success rate;T'aint bad)"
T'aint bad, Sarah. Too bad you couldn't do it without skirting an armed Revolution - note Palin's "Commonsense" association. The problem is, that this all has the potential to wind up much less like "American Revolution II", and much more like "Civil War II". These "Stooges" are playing with catastrophic fire.
And then, there's the Maha Rushie, with his "glorious naked body" and "talent on loan from God-duh and JeeeeSUS".
Rush Limbaugh is the king daddy of fundamentalist, three stooge, conservative lunacy. From the October 26, 2010, Rush Limbaugh Show, in a segment titled, "Confused Clifford on Reverse Operation Chaos and "Tyranny":
"The tyranny of the minority is Obama. We are being ruled in this country by a minority, a very small minority. Obama and liberalism in this country represent 25 to 30% of the thinking in this country. We outnumber liberals in all these personal preference polls by two to one. Why in the world are we the ones have to act defensive about who we are? They're the ones that ought to be explaining who the hell they are and what they're doing! They're the ones destroying America, by design or by accident or who cares? That's what's happening. In many cases it is by design. But they are the ones. You know, Obama said "punish your enemies," walking out there. He's not interested in getting along with us. He's not interested in compromise or anything. He's not interested in recognizing where he's going wrong and the American people disagree with it and all that. This is... In a lot of people's minds, this is it, where the future of the country is concerned."
Sorry to have to tell you this, GOP Americans, but Limbaugh is wrong about almost everything that's going on, on Planet Earth. He's wrong, for instance, when it comes to the Constitution, the Founding Fathers, the science of global climate change, the Bible, the science of Evolution, nutritional science, exercise science, sports, and anything else he chooses to pontificate about. That's why he hides behind a caller dump button.
Then there was this, just the other day from the "pervert, perverting the Constitution". From the January 6, 2011, Rush Limbaugh Show, in a segment titled " Don't Bother Sending Your Kids to New York to be Union Stagehands":
"You mentioned Cloward-Piven. The purpose of Cloward-Pivenis to overload the welfare system. Just overload it. It can't survive. It totally crashes. Nobody has anything. You have total chaos. You have anarchy, because nobody has anything. Because without anybody working, nobody having a job, there's nothing produced and there's nothing to transfer, and nobody has anything. The people expecting to live off government largesse, there isn't anyway. The people expecting to live off Social Security, welfare, there isn't any if you take Cloward-Piven out to its natural conclusion. And during all this you have these people who say, "The government is good! It is the only good." They'll do nothing but rely on government."
Here's the question that America, even if there is no evidence that the Tucson shooting is tied to the these three wingnut ringmasters, must ask itself. While their separate, individual messages may not be "inciting" a bloody Revolution, could their combined message have that effect? Let's look at a brief, digest of what that combined message looks like.
Beck sets the stage for modern acceptable revolution:
"Common Sense: The Case Against an Out-of-Control Government, Inspired by Thomas Paine"
Palin advocates for the 2nd Amendment and targeting "Obamacare-lovin' incumbent seats":
"Don't Retreat, Instead - RELOAD!" . . .
"Remember months ago "bullseye" icon used 2 target the 20 Obamacare-lovin' incumbent seats? We won 18 out of 20 (90% success rate;T'aint bad)"
Limbaugh ties it all together with the sounds of Armageddon:
"Just overload it. It can't survive. It totally crashes. Nobody has anything. You have total chaos. You have anarchy, because nobody has anything."
Of course, Limbaugh is saying that the blood will be on the hands of those gol darn libruls, because it is they, the gol darn libruls, that started all this with their nanny state, busy body, Obamacare.
These three clowns can kid themselves all they want. The truth is, that these three stooges may indeed be the Thomas Paine-like catalyst that stirs America to Revolution, but the idea that theirs will be an unarmed, peaceful Revolution, when it happens, is ridiculous, irresponsible, and wishful thinking.
Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter
Sign-Up Now for the Opposing Views Daily Newsletter

You cannot convince me that the government is in the right when they violate the Constitution. We have the duty to get rid of any politicians that propose laws or other legislation that does violate the Constitution. After all it confirms the right that you have to write drivel.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/becks-matthews-mocked-conspiracy-confirmed-video-of-us-communists-socialists-unions-working-with-muslim-brotherhood-assoc-groups /
"Israel, you were born by the sword, you live by the sword, and you will die by the sword."
Actually, Israel was born by UN resolution. Upon becoming a nation in 1948, they invited Palestinians to remain and be part of the future success story. Most Palestinians, angry, left. The surrounding Muslim states would not accept them, so the "refugee camps" happened, breeding grounds for misery and of course terrorism.
If individual Jews were conducting suicide bombing missions into the camps, I think the world would know. It's the other way around.
Self-defense is not a crime .
http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2011/02/actions-louder-than-words-eric-holder.html
An international incident is always good for scaring people away from their liberty.
http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com/2011/01/atf-execs-ululations-of-agony-not-so.html
And as freedom-loving?
And what do you think of the "inflammatory political speech" of
a featured protestor against a 30-year dictatorship?
"We will not be silenced. Whether you are a Christian, a Muslim, or an atheist, you will fight for your goddamned rights. You will HAVE your goddamned rights!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC0NldhTZ7A
Oooh. "Fight." That's not "civility."
Another demonstrator says "For my son and I ... I will die today."
I don't think he means he's going to shoot HIMSELF or run over HIMSELF with a police armored vehicle or government tank.
Talking wasn't working. Dissent was not tolerated.
This is what happens next.
He's warning American dabblers who embrace REAL socialists.
What Beck said, in context, was:
“Just because you in Washington and you who are so out of touch with life in the media , just because you don‘t believe in anything doesn’t mean nobody else does. We do. You know why you’re confused by this show? It’s because I believe in something. You don’t.
Tea parties believe in small government. We believe in returning to the principles of our Founding Fathers. We respect them. We revere them. Shoot me in the head before I stop talking about the Founders. Shoot me in the head if you try to change our government.
I will stand against you and so will millions of others. We believe in something. You in the media and most in Washington don’t. The radicals that you and Washington have co-opted and brought in wearing sheep’s clothing — change the pose. You will get the ends.
You’ve been using them? They believe in communism. They believe and have called for a revolution. You’re going to have to shoot them in the head. But warning, they may shoot you.
They are dangerous because they believe. Karl Marx is their George Washington. You will never change their mind. And if they feel you have lied to them — they’re revolutionaries. Nancy Pelosi, those are the people you should be worried about.”
* * *
Beck telling his audience to take up arms? As Patterico’s Pontifications says, “Nothing could be further from the truth.” NewsBusters says there’s, “nothing to the charge,” and RedState goes as far as to say, “I’m almost embarrassed for anybody gullible enough that they fell for this one.”
Funny how things change once you get the full context.
– The Blaze
after the people softened him up by revolting.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/76683.html
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/big-brother-love-jesse-jackson-admits-flotus-is-taking-over-americans-diets-and-calls-for-more-massive-gov-takeovers-while-progressives-cheer /
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/violent-riot-advocate-frances-fox-piven-invents-wild-accusations-about-the-blaze-audio /
She has and does, then denies it. Recordings prove she lies, then lies about lying.
"It's wartime, and bullets are expensive. So people grabbed whatever they could from their villages -- axes, hatchets, scythes, sickles, clubs, hoes, pickaxes, shovels, -- and they did the killing accordingly."
After having been "invited to participate in this sacred religious obligation."
6,400 women and children massacred by their neighbors.
"The police soldiers in Yozgat and Boghazliyan ... would even boast to some of us how they had committed tortures and decapitations, cut off and chopped up body parts with axes, and how they had dismembered suckling infants and children by pulling apart their legs or dashing them on rocks."
Testimony of a Muslim Turk to a man being taken to his own murder by government, so he saw no harm in giving details.