Atheist: 5 Factors that Cause Christians to Lose Faith
I just thought I’d put this out there since I’ve been thinking about these kinds of things for years. By no means are all of the following factors involved in every story of deconversion. But in every case at least one of them is true. So here goes:
1) A crisis of some kind that cannot be reconciled with one’s faith. It could be the loss of a child to Leukemia, being molested by a priest, or a tornado that ripped through one’s house. It could be bankruptcy, or being sent to prison when innocent. Or it could be the loss of one’s life savings because of a con-artist. It could be noticeable hypocrisy from church members, a church fight, and/or being ostracized by the church rather than cared for in times of need. The church is, after all, the one place where they shoot their own wounded. And when cast aside by the church these believers must deal with any doubts on their own, and at that point they are free to question what they believed without the social pressure to conform. Many different tragic events could cause Christians to question their faith. While most Christians will reaffirm their faith in the midst of a crisis, many others will reject it. Then it will be said of these former believers that they left the fold because of emotional reasons, when the fact is that the crisis merely shocked them into doing what sane reasonable adults should have done all along, question what they believed in the first place. Snapping is a good term to describe this process, for in a very short amount of time a person is snapped into seeing everything in a new light.
2) An intense desire to know the truth objectively as possible. This is the intellectually honest approach that few believers ever even consider doing. Having been raised as Christians in a Christian culture they seek as adults to re-evaluate what they were taught to believe because they have subsequently learned that their parents were not always right about everything. This is where they attempt as best as they can to be consistent with the various religions and sects in the world by subjecting them all the the same level of skepticism. This represents my Outsider Test for Faith that I’ve been defending here at DC and in my books. At this point they will engage in a real quest for knowledge by reading both sides of the debate, which can and does lead to skepticism about all religious faiths. I have a challenge for these kinds of believers called the Debunking Christianity Challenge. Take me up on this. I dare you. It can do you no harm. Quite the contrary, it can only make you better informed.
3) A deeper study of one or more intractable issues that constantly haunts a believer. Knowledge is the antidote to the delusion of faith. With childhood indoctrination having such a powerful grip on believers, as I wrote about here, containing so many powerful ideas to keep them in the faith for as long as they live, it sometimes takes a massive amount of information to overcome it. There are people driven to know what they believe and why they believe it. They have a certain personality trait in which they refuse to simply parrot the party line because that’s what they were told to believe. They are thinkers. They want to know. They have an intense desire, more than most, to become informed. They are not afraid of coming to their own conclusions despite what others whom they know and respect believe. These thinkers are so passionate they enter college and get advanced degrees in theology, Biblical studies, philosophy, or science. While most believers are satisfied with the first glib answer they come across, or they simply punt to faith that God knows the answer, these thinkers are not so easily satisfied. For Hector Avalos, Robert Price, Bart Ehrman, William Dever, and many others their quest for more knowledge ended their faith, as it did for me. A deeper study of one particular problem can and has led believers away from their faith. For the late Ken Pulliam it was the atonement that led him away from the Christian faith. He could not make sense of how the death of Jesus on the cross could possibly save people from their sins. For exapologist it was a deeper study of the promise of the return of Jesus, which he could not make sense of except that it was a failed one.
4) Entering an occupation that leads Christians away from their faith like the ones listed here.
5) World travel, not as a missionary necessarily, but just world travel, lots of it. Then it will slowly dawn on the Christian that there are happily fulfilled people around the globe who are both morally good and rational although they were raised with different religious beliefs. This can be a shocking experience. It will teach Christian believers how parochial and sequestered they are from the real world, one that gets along just fine without any direct Christian influence or teaching.
Sign up for the OV Daily Newsletter
Sign-Up Now for the Opposing Views Daily Newsletter

Thats the day that I started to study the why's of war and religion.
The answer became clear when Bush invaded Iraq and it was found to have no WMD's.
I was blown away by how easy it was for leaders to convince the public to invade a country based on false fear mongering.
I connected the dots for many wars in history to have the same sort of propaganda.
Hitler was a master at this propaganda. He used religious bias to eliminate opposition.
The Jews were soulless as far as the German Christians were concerned, thus it was not murder to kill them.
The American Christians are now using the Muslim boogie man as a reason to take over the middle east.
They believe in the wrong god so it is easy to kill them.
Some may never learn from history and see the 'why's for atrocities.
Why am I urged to pick a side?
Why do I feel that not picking a side is wrong?
Conclusion, I pick none. Declaring myself an atheist recognizes the existence of a God which I claim I refuse to believe in. It sounds to me like a childish rebellion against what the majority choose to believe in.
Am I an atheist? What do I think? How about this for an answer; I don't think about God, nor do I think about whether he exists, or not. Simply, I don't care if he does exist or doesn't, because I never think about it long enough for it to be important.
Same thing goes for most everything, I rarely think about gays, lesbians, political sides, nor any issues that do not directly affect my life. I live my life, why can't you live yours?
as well.
This entire list is a long winded way of calling Christians stupid.
Number 5 is ridiculous.
That's under the assumption that Christians are hateful like atheist. Not so.
Number 4 is a joke.
Atheist coming near death change their views about no God.
Number 3 is stupid.
Why? Not only is it wordy...it needs major editing to get to the point. There are Biologist who are Christians. Just so you know in all your ignorance you failed to research better.
Number 2 is stupider than all of them. This is assuming you're objective and smart. Which you haven't proved at all.
1 is retarded. If they fall into atheism because of mistreatment that's not only stupid...it's weak.
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid. - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
"This entire list is a long winded way of calling Christians stupid."
If you cannot take the heat ....stay out of the kitchen.
agree with the list.
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid. - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
"This entire list is a long winded way of calling Christians stupid."
Some Christians ARE stupid.
"Number 5 is ridiculous.
That's under the assumption that Christians are hateful like atheist. Not so. "
That's right...there are no "hateful" christians...only atheists.
"Number 4 is a joke.
Atheist coming near death change their views about no God."
And some christians coming near death change their views about the existence of god. So what?
"Number 3 is stupid.
Why? Not only is it wordy...it needs major editing to get to the point. There are Biologist who are Christians. Just so you know in all your ignorance you failed to research better."
Some biologists are buddhists too. So what?
"Number 2 is stupider than all of them. This is assuming you're objective and smart. Which you haven't proved at all. "
Neither have you proven you're smart, so I guess the score is even.
"1 is retarded. If they fall into atheism because of mistreatment that's not only stupid...it's weak"
...and who appointed the arbiter of who is weak?
Honestly, J, despite teh chnage in your avatar, you're still shallow as a pond. Everything and everyone that you don't agree with is "stupid" in your no-so-humble opinion. Shallow as a pond....
I can't wait for your reply. Try to think of some clever way to insult me this time, OK? Your usual routine is boring and predictable.
right.
You said "So what" a lot.
Should have said that as a reply to this poorly thought out as well written opinion.
You don't respond to me often. But if you did, I'd yawn more than reply.
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid. - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
Jammer... You seem to be somewhat intelligent. Therefore, I challenge you to read the following links IN DETAIL, disposing preconceived notions. Moreover, consider the following questions:
Do you remember being born?
Do you remember anything BEFORE you were born?
What is your first memory and how old were you?
Now visit the following links and read. You say you are a thinker. now prove it.
http://jesusneverexisted.com
http://godisimaginary.com
http://theamericanheathen.com
RJ Evans
TheAmericanHeathen.com
ShockNetRadio.com
and one is that the mention of slavery as a bad thing reads as if the person giving this opinion only has one idea of what slavery is. That's like thinking gay meant what it means to day 100 years ago.
second problem is no mention of Josephus.
I'd mention more, but those we can start with.
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid. - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
Keep reading Jammer. You cannot come to a conclusion by reading a few select pieces. As with everything, one must read and read and read. There's so much more to read. Now, I'm assuming that you have just touched on a few things from jesusneverexisted.com. Use the search bar and type in "slavery" or "Josephus" or whatever suits you, and then read. Then, check the information with other sources (non-theological and theological). Take your time. But, do your best NOT to form an opinion until you have been thorough. More importantly, stay focused on finding facts.
As to the questions I asked you...
I would appreciate reading your answers.
RJ Evans
TheAmericanHeathen.com
ShockNetRadio.com