Medicalm

AMA Ends 72-Year Policy, Says Marijuana has Medical Benefits

Opinion by ASA
(November 10, 2009) in Society / Drug Law
HOUSTON --- The American Medical Association (AMA) voted today to reverse its long-held position that marijuana be retained as a Schedule I substance with no medical value. The AMA adopted a report drafted by the AMA Council on Science and Public Health (CSAPH) entitled, "Use of Cannabis for Medicinal Purposes," which affirmed the therapeutic benefits of marijuana and called for further research. The CSAPH report concluded that, "short term controlled trials indicate that smoked cannabis reduces neuropathic pain, improves appetite and caloric intake especially in patients with reduced muscle mass, and may relieve spasticity and pain in patients with multiple sclerosis." Furthermore, the report urges that "the Schedule I status of marijuana be reviewed with the goal of facilitating clinical research and development of cannabinoid-based medicines, and alternate delivery methods."

The change of position by the largest physician-based group in the country was precipitated in part by a resolution adopted in June of 2008 by the Medical Student Section (MSS) of the AMA in support of the reclassification of marijuana's status as a Schedule I substance. In the past year, the AMA has considered three resolutions dealing with medical marijuana, which also helped to influence the report and its recommendations. The AMA vote on the report took place in Houston, Texas during the organization's annual Interim Meeting of the House of Delegates. The last AMA position, adopted 8 years ago, called for maintaining marijuana as a Schedule I substance, with no medical value.

"It's been 72 years since the AMA has officially recognized that marijuana has both already-demonstrated and future-promising medical utility," said Sunil Aggarwal, Ph.D., the medical student who spearheaded both the passage of the June 2008 resolution by the MSS and one of the CSAPH report's designated expert reviewers. "The AMA has written an extensive, well-documented, evidence-based report that they are seeking to publish in a peer-reviewed journal that will help to educate the medical community about the scientific basis of botanical cannabis-based medicines." Aggarwal is also on the Medical & Scientific Advisory Board of Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the largest medical marijuana advocacy organization in the U.S.

The AMA's about face on medical marijuana follows an announcement by the Obama Administration in October discouraging U.S. Attorneys from taking enforcement actions in medical marijuana states. In February 2008, a resolution was adopted by the American College of Physicians (ACP), the country's second largest physician group and the largest organization of doctors of internal medicine. The ACP resolution called for an "evidence-based review of marijuana's status as a Schedule I controlled substance to determine whether it should be reclassified to a different schedule. "The two largest physician groups in the U.S. have established medical marijuana as a health care issue that must be addressed," said ASA Government Affairs Director Caren Woodson. "Both organizations have underscored the need for change by placing patients above politics."

Though the CSAPH report has not been officially released to the public, AMA documentation indicates that it: "(1) provides a brief historical perspective on the use of cannabis as medicine; (2) examines the current federal and state-based legal envelope relevant to the medical use of cannabis; (3) provides a brief overview of our current understanding of the pharmacology and physiology of the endocannabinoid system; (4) reviews clinical trials on the relative safety and efficacy of smoked cannabis and botanical-based products; and (5) places this information in perspective with respect to the current drug regulatory framework."

Further information:

Executive Summary of AMA Report
Recommendations of AMA Report
American College of Physicians resolution

--------------------------

Marijuana-Related Databases on Opposing Views

See a state-by-state list of the effects of marijuana legislation.

See a list of marijuana dispensaries in the United States.

Regarding Opinion
AMA Ends 72-Year Policy, Says Marijuana has Medical Benefits

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Brenda Shoop
    big news

    This is big news for those who wish to use cannabis medicinally with the government 's approval.

    - Brenda ShoopUS November 10, 2009 2:52PM

    Reply to this Recommend (4) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • dmunkey
    Optomisim vs. realism

    As optomistic as I am this this is the end of Cannabis prohibition, realistically as the AMA has made sure to make it abundantly clear that they do NOT endorse the legalization of Cannabis. More than likely "the powers that be" will re-classify Cannabis to a Schedual 2 narcotic (like Cocaine, and Opiates), stating that there is "some" medical benefits .
    I personally won't be happy until society realises that consumeing Cannabis via eating or vaporizing is far less harmful than ANY of those o' so large and colorful cans of energy drink, ya know the ones kids have no trouble buying.

    - dmunkeyUS November 10, 2009 3:49PM

    Reply to this Recommend (6) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • Clay
      Ahhhhhh

      Even as a schedule 2 drug,the DEA loses their control over the production of any marijuana for use in clinical tests and they lose the
      role of overseer for any study. Because it is not a schedule 1 drug,they
      no longer will be required to fight legalization ,by any means necessary, as they do now.
      It opens the door for everything we want,and will bring about legalization.

      - ClayUS November 11, 2009 2:04AM

      Reply to this Recommend (5) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Clay
    Realiistic

    With the DEA out of the loop and not able to stop all medical studies as they have since they started up,all the cancer blocking attributes of marijuana will be more thoroughly tested and either confirmed or debunked. I believe that as in the study from Spain on head and neck
    cancers,marijuana smokers are over 60% less likely to have the cancer in the first place. How many billions of dollars in cancer treatments could we save if it is true? How many lives?
    The researchers admit that they don't know exactly how marijuana blocks cancer,other than some of the canibinoids (not in my spell checker) in marijuana that have shown possible cancer blocking
    possibilities in several other clinical tests. Their study was done using statistics and clinical information from other studies that have found possible cancer blocking properties.
    And this is old news to our government . They have allowed millions to contract cancer if it is true. The University Of Virginia was doing a clinical trial using marijuana to treat cancer and the DEA shut them down,in 1975. One of the studies the researchers in Spain used was the largest clinical study ever done on marijuana and lung function,by
    the National Institute of Drug Abuse,trying to link smoking marijuana
    and cancer using the same methods used when tobacco was linked
    with cancer. After 4 years of study,the researchers found that marijuana did not cause cancer and that it even showed possible cancer treatment and preventive attributes,and said further studies should be done. They never were,because it is illegal for the DEA to allow anyone to do those studies,as long as marijuana is Schedule 1.
    Donald Tashkin was a researcher on that study,and is the head researcher now for UCLA. Search him out and listen to what he says.
    There are videos of interviews with him on youtube. And the complete study is available at the cannabis research library.
    The Spanish study is also there,and 2 or 3 other studies,one on prostate cancer,another on breast cancer ,all known by our government and ignored.

    - ClayUS November 11, 2009 2:40AM

    Reply to this Recommend (5) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • ldlework
      NONSENSE

      All of this discussion about the benefits of Marijuana is /nonsense/! Let me submit that this subject *should* have nothing to do with the benefits of Marijuana and more like the facts that smoking Marijuana has no -- negative -- effects! What in the Harry Anslinger is our Federal Government, no less, doing spending several billion dollars a year throwing non-violent dope users in prison ?!

      If when the topic of Marijuana comes up around you and the first thing you think of is how it might stop cancer or be used medicinally you need to stop your self, breathe deep, and realize no - the legalization of this plant is a much more serious issue than the loss of its effects. We owe it to the several hundred thousand people who go to jail each year for smoking a *EXCEEDINGLY HARMLESS* plant.

      - ldleworkUS November 11, 2009 8:12AM

      Reply to this Recommend (2) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • Fujimoto420
        Commendable but narrow in scope. . .

        I commend your efforts to bring attention to those who are victims of this senseless war on drugs , but you can't win a race just on speed alone. You need stamina, courage, drive, willpower. Same thing with our fight for legalization . We need to bring ALL our cards to the table. Raid victims, crime , drug cartels, the medical benifits, the fact that it's safer than many other substances. I can go on and on about this but I think you would get the point. If we attack from every angle and discuss all of these, it's hard to ignore the bigger picture.

        Where there is truth, we will succeed.

        - Fujimoto420US December 29, 2009 11:47AM

        Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Concerned Parent
    Let's save our kids from the drug dealers

    I’m disgusted by the idea that my taxes are spent arresting marijuana users while violent criminals roam free, and I’m sick of the idea that the criminal drug cartels might try to get my kids involved in drugs just for the money .
    Licensing, taxing, and regulating the distribution of marijuana is the surest way to put the criminal drug dealers out of business and protect our children from the money-hungry criminal element. It’s time to protect our children and take the marijuana business out of the hands of criminals. License, tax, and regulate the marijuana business.
    And while we’re at it, let’s find a way to pull the revenue-hungry public policy in the right direction on personal cultivation (i.e., let’s get past the “you can’t tax it because people will just grow their own” argument). Let’s implement a personal cultivation permit. Limit the size of the growing area or the number of plants, and put a small user-fee on it to cover administrative costs, something like a fishing license. Maybe high enough that there will be a little something left over for education or fixing the roads.
    One possibility:$100 per year for a permit to cultivate a dozen plants.
    It’s a win-win.

    - Concerned ParentUS November 11, 2009 8:51AM

    Reply to this Recommend (3) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • Katatawnic
      The whole "sin tax" thing is indescribably out of hand.

      I was right with you until you suggested taxing small personal grows for "administrative" costs. These don't exist for those who enjoy making their own beer or wine in their own homes, so why should personal marijuana cultivators be charged such fees if/when marijuana becomes (re)legalized? There are no administrative costs levied on me to grow my own fruits and vegetables, or to raise my own livestock, etc.

      It's one thing to tax us on what we buy and sell. It's quite another to tax us for what we can do all on our own, without anyone's help and without harming anyone.

      - KatatawnicUS November 25, 2009 11:26AM

      Reply to this Recommend (4) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • Fujimoto420
        Still on the fence

        I don't know whether to agree or disagree. A tax or levy would certainly benifit our economy , given that the money would go towards our schools , roads, etc. However, we don't have to pay taxes to grow a tomato plant or the flower sitting in the window sill. Why should we have to pay to grow another plant.

        And for the greener arguement, plants reduce C02 emmisions in the air, so why not GROW GROW GROW.

        - Fujimoto420US December 29, 2009 11:51AM

        Reply to this Recommend (2) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • Katatawnic
          Or, as I like to say...

          "Screw organized crime ... grow your own!" ;)

          I'm a medical user, and rarely smoke it; I mostly cook with it and use it in 100% organic homemade body lotion for topical pain treatment. (It relieves my muscle, bone and joint pain; not just surface stuff!) However, making edibles and topical remedies requires more plant material than smoking does, and I can't afford to pay the outrageous prices (via the black market and dispensaries alike; the prices are NOT competitive, to say the least) with disability income even for just smoking it.

          So I grow my own. (Medical status in my state, so I'm legal to grow up to a certain amount.) I already pay taxes on all of the supplies I have to buy to cultivate it, as well as the higher utility bills due to growing. The taxes I've paid and continue paying for the costs of cultivating are quite a pretty penny. If the gov't wishes to profit from my plants by taxing my garden, then they can cultivate it for me and I'll be happy to pay them for their product and hard work. It would be preferable to enduring the price I now have to pay (i.e., severe pain) taking care of my little garden.

          Horrid economy or not, I draw the line at paying taxes for literally busting my back (and hips, and legs, and neck, and hands, and...) working on something from which I will not profit (sell). If I were making a profit off of it, that would be another story altogether: income tax. The monetary expenses my gardening incur come to about $50 an ounce, which is what I keep hearing CA would probably charge for taxes once it becomes (re)legalized.

          So, you see, my garden is already being taxed; figuratively and literally. :)

          - KatatawnicUS December 29, 2009 1:15PM

          Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • AB390
    Common sense

    Finally some common sense about cannabis from the AMA!

    If you live in California and support an end to prohibition, visit http://yes390.org

    - AB390US November 12, 2009 1:37PM

    Reply to this Recommend (4) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • speed59
    Oh Goodie

    The only medical benefit it has is to dull the pain of those who REALLY are suffering from an illness, otherwise all we'll have is high, stoned out of their minds people driving /walking around.
    For those who are for it, please let me know when you have smoked it & then plan to go out so I can warn all my loved ones to stay indoors until the all clear!
    (Yes, alcohol is right up there with it but I don't condone drinking & driving either)
    Can't wait for all this to happen and to all you that are druggies or are for it all I can say is;
    HIT ME WITH YOUR BEST SHOT!

    - speed59IE November 16, 2009 11:54AM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • ooonimrodooo
      I hate to break it to you...

      but... honestly, millions of people already smoke marijuana , and I bet you anything that 75% of them are already driving around while high. While I do not condone it, I do believe that it has no where near the judgment altering capabilities as alcohol . It is far less harmful than alcohol and some people can actually focus better when using the drug. So no, alcohol is not "right up there with it" but far above it when it comes to severity.

      - ooonimrodoooUS November 16, 2009 1:26PM

      Reply to this Recommend (5) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • speed59
        So because already do it

        means it's ok to make it legal ? What kind of reasoning is that? Where are your facts to back up your statement where you believe that it's judgement altering or is less harmful? Are you & society wiling to take the chance on less harmful or someone's judgement is less impaired when it comes to your loved one's health on either the receiving or giving end of a 3000lb auto? (Yeah, talk to the mother in upstate NY who killed her relatives on the highway about it. Oh wait, you can't cause she's dead from smoking weed & drinkiing!)

        Those for legalization are under the impression that it can be controlled like tobacco or alcohol are forgetting one simple fact. One just cannot grow their own tobacco or make their own alcohol unless they want to use a part of their garden (which would only be during growing season) or would want to use their bathtub to make their drinks.
        Point is, one can grow weed (which it really is) almost anywhere. So, where's the control & money from the taxes ? Legalization will only bring a new set of laws for control.
        Of course, people will still complain about how their tax $$s are wasted on arrests & convictions for possession while the system lets more violent criminls go free. Well my response to that is;
        What ever happened to following the rules & right/wrong, good v evil?
        ... Read More
        Fix the system & don't take the easy way out!
        Sorry to offfend but anyone for legalization is either because they smoke it in the closet in secrecy or are neighborhood drug dealers growing it in public lands or in the spare bedroom so their argument for is just lame!

        - speed59IE November 16, 2009 11:45PM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • se7ens
          Actually it's really quite easy

          to make alcohol in your home. In fact, most higher end liquor stores even sell home micro brewing kits for making your own beer. By focusing on this one part of it though, (the smoking while driving bit which should be illegal ) you're missing the larger view of the whole thing which is, this plant seems to be an almost wunderdrug. It has been shown to fight cancer and actually reduce the size of tumors in patients along with a litany of other benefits it has. Besides, you're going to be hard-pressed to convince me of the evilness of any plant.

          - se7ensUS November 17, 2009 10:08AM

          Reply to this Recommend (3) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • speed59
            Really??

            By reading all your supporting statement(?), it looks as if you can't even convince yourself of the wonderfulness of it. I like how you go on to say "this plant seems to be an almost wunderdrug." ALMOST??!! Are you & society willing to bet your lives on ALMOST??
            Of course one can make their own alcohol , ever heard of bathtub gin? Read a few stories about the Prohibition era in the U.S. & then tell me about high end liquor stores.

            Your whole argument for is all based on supposition & your saying that I'm mssing the larger view? Actutually, I see more of the bigger picture than you or those who are for since human nature is to always find the easy way out & circumnavigate common sense.
            As I said, making it legal will do nothing but generate a few dollars for the gov't & keep the illegal growing in the spare rooms, public parks & gardens. No amount of control will stop this & you'lll end with more laws for control than what's on the books right now! I don't need to convince you or anyone of anything, just sit back & watch. Talk to anyone who uses it for medicianal purposes & they'll tell you that it eases their pain, puts them on another plane. Well, duh! I think we all knew that from either trying it ourselves or talking to those that smoke it.

            Again, talk to the family of those who were killed by the wrong way driver in upstate NY. She was a mother & everyone in the van was killed including her nieces. Tell that to the husband who swore that "Not his Wife" but yet she had a mixture of alcohol & Weed in her system from smoking it a few times a week. NEED ANY MORE CONVINCING OR ARE YOU JUST TOO HARD HEADED TO SEE THE FACTS? You probably have no kids , not even married. Just wait once those loved ones of yours are placed in harms way by someone high on weed comes their way. Will you still need convincing then?

            Good luck to you.

            - speed59IE November 17, 2009 12:19PM

            Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

            • kajuroe
              What planet are u on?

              Clearly speed, you are anti marijuana no matter what. The reference you just used had a woman that crashed her car while she was drunk and happened to have traces of marijuana in her system from her occasional use. The crash was caused by the alcohol , not the weed. I challenge you to find one story where only marijuana was the cause of the fatal incident.

              I have smoked for 15 years now. I am married with 2 kids and operate a corporation as the CEO. I have friends that are engineers that smoke marijuana daily. You clearly have no idea how many Americans already smoke, or otherwise ingest marijuana on a regular basis.

              Due to your hatred towards this plant I am sure you are completely unaware of all the products that can be manufactured from it. The medical benefits of this plant are only the tip of the iceberg. The list is practically endless, so take some time and actually learn about the benefits of marijuana before spewing your narrow minded opinions.

              If you really want to see just how respected this plant once was here in the U.S. then take some time and research what the very first law regarding this plant had to say.

              - kajuroeUS November 19, 2009 8:40AM

              Reply to this Recommend (5) Icon flag

              Thank You for your Comment

              We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

              • speed59
                Same planet as you(Unfortunately)

                You know, at first I wasn't going to waste my time with the likes of you but then it hit me: You're the CEO of a company & know engineers. I wonder if CEO of a home based envelope stuffing from your trailer actually counts & the title of engineer doesn't mean much of anything anymore these days as it is sooo overused! Please let me know the company so I & all my friends/relatives can avoid your products like Swine Flu. Hopefully, I also never use any of the products that your so-called engineers ever have to see either.
                Personally, I could care less who smokes, does what on their own time (which you missed the point entirely), I just don't believe that it should be made legal . You keep missing the fact (or ignoring) that even if it is made legal, more laws will have to be enacted just to control it and also to punish those who still grow it illegally, so where's the money generated? Anyone who even has a TRACE in their system and is driving a car would be just as guilty and DANGEROUS so what is the difference between having a TRACE & smoking 10 joints? You're logic is amazing & no matter what you are going to be Pro until it hits you right between the eyes when someone you profess to love is harmed or killed because of it. I bet that you're even against the death penalty too!

                You are in the land of eutopia if you think that all would be soo wonderful if it's made legal(never said anything about me being against using it for medicial purposes either, knucklehead). Oh wait I forgot, you are in la la land cause you smoke it!
                Oh, this only took me all of two minutes to find considering that one of the persons killed was the parent of my friend so don't tell me it doesn't do any harm;
                http://www.philly.com/philly/news/new_jersey/20091010_Driver_in_fatal_Route_38_crash_charged_with_DUI.html

                PLEASE STAY OFF THE ROADS & AWAY FROM YOUR SPOUSE/KIDS YOU LOSER!

                - speed59IE November 19, 2009 1:22PM

                Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

                Thank You for your Comment

                We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • snackle
    How Long Before The Politicians Catch Up?

    72 years ago the AMA didn't say they supported banning the substance. They actually thought the legislation was rather rash and their fears were unfounded. The entire debate on the bill lasted less than two minutes before they decided for all of America that marijuana is bad and nobody should ever have to use it. I'm glad to see the AMA coming out to publicly support the substance for its positive uses, but apparently news travels slow in Washington. Maybe we can have a highly restrictive law to somewhat legalize medical marijuana in 20 years.

    - snackleUS November 16, 2009 12:23PM

    Reply to this Recommend (3) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • scottportraits1
      20 Years is too long to Wait

      Tough if news travels slow in Washington, DC. We can't wait 20 years every time politicians lag behind the public's common sense, while they fiddle around and make enormous salaries. Medical cannabis is legal NOW in 14 states, and about 24 states have MJ decriminalization / legalization measures on the ballots.

      Forget about about half measures and more stalling. There's no time for "highly restrictive laws to somewhat legalize medical marijuana in 20 years."

      - scottportraits1US December 28, 2009 10:07PM

      Reply to this Recommend (2) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • chmmrx
    Marijuana is the flame, heroin is the fuse, LSD is the bomb

    It is important to note the original instances that created our current problem. A racist push for department finances and special interests were the original reasons for marijuana prohibition. Alcohol prohibition had ended. The head of what equaled the DEA 70 odd years ago, needed tax revenue.. This is the original mindset and process that criminalized marijuana...


    Harry J. Anslinger - most direct founder of marijuana prohibition:


    "There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos, and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz, and swing, result from marijuana use . This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and any others."
    "...the primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races."
    "Marijuana is an addictive drug which produces in its users insanity, criminality, and death."
    "Reefer makes darkies think they're as good as white men."
    "Marihuana leads to pacifism and communist brainwashing"
    "You smoke a joint and you're likely to kill your brother."
    "Marijuana is the most violence-causing drug in the history of mankind."


    William Randolf Hearst - H.J.Anslinger's Yellow Journalism partner, San Francisco Examiner:


    "Marihuana makes fiends of boys in thirty days - Hashish goads users to bloodlust."
    "By the tons it is coming into this country - the deadly, dreadful poison that racks and tears not only the body, but the very heart and soul of every human being who once becomes a slave to it in any of its cruel and devastating forms.... Marihuana is a short cut to the insane asylum. Smoke marihuana cigarettes for a month and what was once your brain will be nothing but a storehouse of horrid specters. Hasheesh makes a murderer who kills for the love of killing out of the mildest mannered man who ever laughed at the idea that any habit could ever get him...."


    Other nationwide columns:


    "Users of marijuana become STIMULATED as they inhale the drug and are LIKELY TO DO ANYTHING. Most crimes of violence in this section, especially in country districts are laid to users of that drug."
    "Was it marijuana, the new Mexican drug, that nerved the murderous arm of Clara Phillips when she hammered out her victim's life in Los Angeles?... THREE-FOURTHS OF THE CRIMES of violence in this country today are committed by DOPE SLAVES - that is a matter of cold record."


    Furthermore:


    "Hearst and Anslinger were then supported by DuPont chemical company and various pharmaceutical companies in the effort to outlaw cannabis . DuPont had patented nylon, and wanted hemp removed as competition. The pharmaceutical companies could neither identify nor standardize cannabis dosages, and besides, with cannabis, folks could grow their own medicine and not have to purchase it from large companies. "


    After completing a two year plan to brainwash society using these sensationalist reports fostered by racist ideology and funded by special intrest, all these guys needed was evidence.. They of course did find their evidence - A two year campaign of manipulated media -opinion coverage was presented as documented evidence to a government committee..


    The committee passed the legislation on. And on the floor of the house , the entire discussion was:


    Member from upstate New York: "Mr. Speaker, what is this bill about?"
    Speaker Rayburn: "I don't know. It has something to do with a thing called marihuana. I think it's a narcotic of some kind."
    "Mr. Speaker, does the American Medical Association support this bill?"
    Member on the committee jumps up and says: "Their Doctor Wentworth came down here. They support this bill 100 percent."


    And on the basis of that lie, on August 2, 1937, marijuana became illegal at the federal level.


    - chmmrxUS December 4, 2009 12:22PM

    Reply to this Recommend (4) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • chmmrx
      Marijuana is the flame, heroin is the fuse, LSD is the bomb

      At this point the enforcement bodies are using similar tactics to maintain negative opinion on marijuana ... Current public remarks, ads , and press releases do not contain the same racist sentiment - that is true.. usually... unless indirect... Although... the use of marijuana among users of all races here in the USA are proportionate, but for some strange reason arrests for possession is considerably varied when viewed by race ...


      No, it is FEAR they still publicly use... Disjointed ads that depict someone neglecting a child or whatever horribly bad imagery they can muster to hold your moral fiber hostage .. Tools of fear, these things are not directly related with marijuana use . There are plenty of people that neglect children with no influence of marijuana. Those are the same people whether they excessively watch TV, play some mmorpg, drink alcohol , abuse steroids , coach a high school football team - what ever - eat pizza every weekend.. the correlation might as well be any of that... Fact is, you would not want intoxication and care of a child together... General opinion supporting this is twisted into acceptance that marijuana makes this happen... Irresponsibility is the fiend, and marijuana did not create the irresponsibility. Imagine the same message blaming beer for causing the child neglect... Excluding propaganda, a seemingly more plausible scenario anyhow, blame seems naturally assigned to the drinker and not the drink... The changing factor is the shroud of "Reefer Madness". Just as in the start.. same old "Earth will plunge into Hell" fear mongering arguments... Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

      - chmmrxUS December 4, 2009 12:23PM

      Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • chmmrx
        Marijuana is the flame, heroin is the fuse, LSD is the bomb

        Of course, there are entities that benefit from marijuana prohibition and are also sworn to uphold it as part of their very job description.


        To quote the DEA, the last time I was at their site:


        "The short term effects of marijuana use include:
        Memory loss, distorted perception, trouble with thinking and problem solving, loss of motor skills, decrease in muscle strength, increased heart rate, and anxiety."


        Now lets look at short term effects with alcohol , only briefly though because the list just goes on and on:


        The short term effects of alcohol use include but not nearly limited to:
        Reduced Inhibitions,Loss of Muscle Control, Memory Loss and/or Blackouts, Trouble with Thinking and Problem Solving, Nausea, Vomiting ,Headaches, Hangovers, Stupor, Distorted Perception, Decrease in Heart Rate, decrease in Muscle Strength, Suicidal Tendencies, Anxiety, and Coma.


        To put it mildly ..I personally do not think marijuana is addictive. Sources supporting otherwise say marijuana is addictive on a psychological level and not a physical level... So, you think you need it, but your body, including the brain, is not truly addicted.. Negative effects of detoxing for marijuana are as bad as anxious behavior/less patience.. Negative effects of detoxing for alcohol are as bad as death...


        Rational individuals, who are agenda free, can not deny the dangers of alcohol.


        With further investigation , the prohibition on marijuana is much worse for society than that of its legalization .


        Suggest, if you will... Normal everyday citizen... They go to work, balance their check book , pay for things, raise children .. you know, live a normal life with one exception.. they ingest marijuana.. Barring any excessive usage/abuse, (which is clearly the same case as with many already legal substances), these people function fine... except respiratory issues when smoked... Do I need mention it is legal to "smoke"! Now lets look at when that same normal everyday citizen gets arrested for possession:


        Prohibition can cause in short:


        1) job loss
        2) criminal charges
        3) loss of children
        4) denial of federal aid
        5) financial downfall
        6) life endangerment
        7) loss of freedom


        The cruel and unusual punishment list goes on... Point is, again, marijuana prohibition is worse for the individual/society than legalization... and not for a moment should we accept this "gateway drug" propaganda... Those whom do, think this plant is essentially the stepping stone to harder drugs .. This bothers me, the marijuana plant is really the first step of drug abuse, and punished as the worst class of drug? Seems to me, these already invalid arguments contradict themselves anyway... This is cruel and unusual punishment at its finest... You get caught with the first step, and you get punished as if you were on the last step.. Yes, the broad arm of enforcement claims it is favorable in the struggle to discourage usage of marijuana... so it wont draw you in, suck you up into a crazy world of drug culture, and expose you to other harder illegal drugs.. Even pretending this is real.. People still end up paying the exaggerated punishment while campaign results are grim. Prohibition is the fiend, and marijuana did not create the prohibition. Eliminate the black market distribution and good people will no longer need to be exposed to the black market.. Eradication and prohibition efforts have not accomplished this, and I dare say will not.. You have to give it up to the enforcement agencies though .. They are charged with upholding this law and to do anything they can that will accomplish that. It is our job to change the laws.. then enforcement will be sworn to uphold the new ones.


        In conclusion it appears to me there is big money at work - alcohol, textile, oil , enforcement agencies, drug cartels, etc, all benefit. The rest of us seem to be the pawns who pay... that is:


        Unless we speak up and let our voice be heard for change in the current law, and against any individual that would have you believe "A law is a law - it does not matter if it is wrong or right!".


        The latter happens to be against a founding principle of this great country. Stop wasting resources on this plant. Record eradication every year - as well as - record growth and availability. This is a money pit for something that is no worse than alcohol.


        To those whom are against marijuana - free your mind of arguments attached to fear mongering please.

        - chmmrxUS December 4, 2009 12:23PM

        Reply to this Recommend (3) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • Fujimoto420
          I love it!

          I love it when someone actually does their homework. BRAVO!!!

          - Fujimoto420US December 29, 2009 12:17PM

          Reply to this Recommend (2) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • chmmrx
            Marijuana is the flame, heroin is the fuse, LSD is the bomb

            I am just a regular Joe who knows he is not a bad person... here is the updated version for anyone who cares :)..

            It is important to note the original instances that created our current problem. A racist push for department finances and special interests were the original reasons for marijuana prohibition. Alcohol prohibition had ended. The head of what equaled the DEA 70 odd years ago, needed tax revenue. This is the original mindset and process that criminalized marijuana.

            Harry J. Anslinger - most direct founder of marijuana prohibition:

            "There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos, and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz, and swing, result from marijuana use . This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and any others."
            "…the primary reason to outlaw marijuana is its effect on the degenerate races."
            "Marijuana is an addictive drug which produces in its users insanity, criminality, and death."
            "Reefer makes darkies think they’re as good as white men."
            "Marihuana leads to pacifism and communist brainwashing"
            "You smoke a joint and you’re likely to kill your brother."
            "Marijuana is the most violence-causing drug in the history of mankind."

            William Randolf Hearst - H.J.Anslinger’s Yellow Journalism partner, San Francisco Examiner:

            "Marihuana makes fiends of boys in thirty days - Hashish goads users to bloodlust."
            "By the tons it is coming into this country - the deadly, dreadful poison that racks and tears not only the body, but the very heart and soul of every human being who once becomes a slave to it in any of its cruel and devastating forms…. Marihuana is a short cut to the insane asylum. Smoke marihuana cigarettes for a month and what was once your brain will be nothing but a storehouse of horrid specters. Hasheesh makes a murderer who kills for the love of killing out of the mildest mannered man who ever laughed at the idea that any habit could ever get him…."
            Other nationwide columns:
            "Users of marijuana become STIMULATED as they inhale the drug and are LIKELY TO DO ANYTHING. Most crimes of violence in this section, especially in country districts are laid to users of that drug."
            "Was it marijuana, the new Mexican drug, that nerved the murderous arm of Clara Phillips when she hammered out her victim’s life in Los Angeles?… THREE-FOURTHS OF THE CRIMES of violence in this country today are committed by DOPE SLAVES - that is a matter of cold record."

            Furthermore:

            "Hearst and Anslinger were then supported by DuPont chemical company and various pharmaceutical companies in the effort to outlaw cannabis . DuPont had patented nylon, and wanted hemp removed as competition. The pharmaceutical companies could neither identify nor standardize cannabis dosages, and besides, with cannabis, folks could grow their own medicine and not have to purchase it from large companies. "

            After completing a two year plan to brainwash society using these sensationalist reports fostered by racist ideology and funded by special interest, all these guys needed was evidence.. They of course did find their evidence - A two year campaign of manipulated media -opinion coverage was presented as documented evidence to a government committee..

            The committee passed the legislation on. And on the floor of the house , the entire discussion was:

            Member from upstate New York: "Mr. Speaker, what is this bill about?"
            Speaker Rayburn: "I don’t know. It has something to do with a thing called marihuana. I think it’s a narcotic of some kind."
            "Mr. Speaker, does the American Medical Association support this bill?"
            Member on the committee jumps up and says: "Their Doctor Wentworth came down here. They support this bill 100 percent."

            And on the basis of that lie, on August 2, 1937, marijuana became illegal at the federal level.

            - chmmrxUS December 29, 2009 1:53PM

            Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

            • chmmrx
              Marijuana is the flame, heroin is the fuse, LSD is the bomb

              Possession of marijuana required a $1 stamp. Individuals without this stamp faced a $2,000 fine, and up to 4 years in prison . Obtaining this government issued stamp required you to show the marijuana in which you were applying for. Following this tax act incriminated you of possession, and therefore made you viable for arrest .

              At this point the enforcement bodies are using similar tactics to maintain negative opinion on marijuana… Current public remarks, ads , and press releases do not contain the same racist sentiment - that is true.. usually… unless indirect… Although… the use of marijuana among users of all races here in the USA are proportionate, but for some strange reason arrests for possession is considerably varied when viewed by race

              No, it is FEAR they still publicly use… Disjointed ads that depict someone neglecting a child or whatever horribly bad imagery they can muster to hold your moral fiber hostage .. Tools of fear, these things are not directly related with marijuana use . There are plenty of people that neglect children with no influence of marijuana. Those are the same people whether they excessively watch TV, play some mmorpg, drink alcohol , abuse steroids , coach a high school football team - what ever - eat pizza every weekend.. the correlation might as well be any of that… Fact is, you would not want intoxication and care of a child together… General opinion supporting this is twisted into acceptance that marijuana makes this happen… Irresponsibility is the fiend, and marijuana did not create the irresponsibility. Imagine the same message blaming beer for causing the child neglect… Excluding propaganda, a seemingly more plausible scenario anyhow, blame seems naturally assigned to the drinker and not the drink. The changing factor is the shroud of "Reefer Madness". Same old "Earth will plunge into Hell" fear mongering smoke and mirror arguments. Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

              Of course, there are entities that benefit from marijuana prohibition and are also sworn to uphold it as part of their very job description.

              To quote the DEA, the last time I was at their site:

              "The short term effects of marijuana use include:
              Memory loss, distorted perception, trouble with thinking and problem solving, loss of motor skills, decrease in muscle strength, increased heart rate, and anxiety."

              Now lets look at short term effects with alcohol, only briefly though because the list just goes on and on.

              The short term effects of alcohol use include but not nearly limited to:
              Reduced inhibitions, loss of muscle control, memory loss and/or blackouts, trouble with thinking and problem solving, nausea, vomiting, headaches, hangovers, stupor, distorted perception, decrease in heart rate, decrease in muscle strength, suicidal tendencies, anxiety, and coma.

              To put it mildly, I personally do not think marijuana is addictive. Sources supporting otherwise say marijuana is addictive on a psychological level and not a physical level… So, you think you need it, but your body, including the brain, is not truly addicted. Negative effects of detoxing for marijuana are as bad as anxious behavior/less patience. Negative effects of detoxing for alcohol are as bad as death.

              Rational individuals, who are agenda free, can not deny the dangers of alcohol.

              - chmmrxUS December 29, 2009 1:55PM

              Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

              Thank You for your Comment

              We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

              • chmmrx
                Marijuana is the flame, heroin is the fuse, LSD is the bomb

                With further investigation , the prohibition on marijuana is much worse for society than legalization .

                Suggest, if you will, any normal everyday citizen. They go to work, balance their check book , pay for things, raise children … you know, live a regular life with one exception; they ingest marijuana. Barring any excessive usage/abuse, (which is clearly the same case as with many already legal substances), these people function fine… except respiratory issues when smoked. Do I need to mention it is legal to "smoke"? Now lets look at when that same normal everyday citizen gets arrested for possession.

                Prohibition can cause in short:

                1) job loss
                2) criminal charges
                3) loss of children
                4) denial of federal aid
                5) financial downfall
                6) life endangerment
                7) loss of freedom

                The cruel and unusual punishment list goes on. Point is, again, marijuana prohibition is worse for the individual/society than legalization.

                Not for a moment should we accept this "gateway drug" propaganda. Those whom do, think this plant is essentially the stepping stone to harder drugs . This bothers me, the marijuana plant is really the first step of drug abuse, and punished as the worst class of drug? Seems to me, these already invalid arguments contradict themselves anyway. This is cruel and unusual punishment at its finest. You get caught with the first step, and you get punished as if you were on the last step. Yes, the broad arm of enforcement claims it is favorable in the struggle to discourage usage of marijuana so it wont draw you in, suck you up into a crazy world of drug culture, and expose you to other harder illegal drugs. Even pretending this is real, people still end up paying the exaggerated punishment while campaign results are grim. Prohibition is the fiend and marijuana did not create the prohibition. Eliminate the black market distribution and good people will no longer need to be exposed to the black market.. Eradication and prohibition efforts have not accomplished this, and I dare say will not.. You have to give it up to the enforcement agencies though. They are charged with upholding this law and to do anything they can that will accomplish that. It is our job to change the laws, then enforcement will be sworn to uphold the new ones.


                - chmmrxUS December 29, 2009 1:56PM

                Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

                Thank You for your Comment

                We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • F2XL
    The AMA shouldn't exist, but at there's a silver lining

    http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2006/06/13/the-ama-protectionist-to-the-core /

    As a trade union, they shouldn't even be around, but at least they've taken a step towards common sense with respect to drug policy. Why regulate something that only affects the people that use it?

    - F2XLUS December 4, 2009 10:06PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Sven123
    Indeed

    The attention of many world leaders is regularly drawn, in part by chance and in part by design, to celebrity news, aka zada news , and its surrounding back stories. This is why news of this type is sought after.

    - Sven123TH December 23, 2009 11:50PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • scottportraits1
    Cannabis Medicine has Benefits

    After what seems like centuries, the AMA, bulwark of the medical establishment, has affirmed the therapeutic benefits of marijuana and called for further research.
    The article's report concludes that, "short term controlled trials indicate smoked cannabis reduces pain, improves appetite, and may relieve spasticity and pain with multiple sclerosis." Furthermore, the report urges that "the Schedule I status of marijuana be reviewed, and alternate delivery methods explored."

    Since rescheduling is the first priority, I suggest we schedule cannabis extracts, potent tinctures, and other state-of-the art delivery medicines in class 2, with morphine and other strong meds that need control. These extracts, tinctures, and isolates will be super-potent, so the possibility of abuse is there, although not as pronounced as addictives like morphine, oxycontin, etc.

    Marijuana for smoking , if legalized and made available for adult use, should be in class 3. It would be rated by potency and 'tars', just like cigarettes . No flashy packaging, no aggressive marketing, no advertising. The bag comes with a warning about possible carcinogens and the dangers of smoking.

    But the extracts and isolates are where the medical community would have its attention. Standardized and measured, with abundant supplies available for pain relief and other applications. Make a month's supply no more than $30. dollars - or else patients who know how to grow will just grow their own. Currently 'Marinol' sells for $300. dollars per month's supply. Insurance won't cover it unless you have cancer or AIDS . When 'Sativex' comes out in the USA in 2010, it will probably sell for several hundred dollars a bottle.

    'Til that time, growing your own herbs, and smoking seedless female buds, are the cheapest ways to obtain your best quality medicine .

    - scottportraits1US December 28, 2009 9:59PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Fujimoto420
    Does this idea scare anyone?

    Ok, I'm just as excited as anyone else about the AMA changing their stance on marijuanas medical benifits, but there is one thing that scares me about it.

    What's to say they won't use this to their advantage to say, "oh yeah, it does have benifits. it should go to the doctors and pharmaseudical companies so now you'll have to go to the doctor and get a perscription and we can charge a lot of money for it."

    We need to make sure this stays in the hands of the citizen, not the corporation.

    - Fujimoto420US December 29, 2009 11:54AM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • tweldy
    The Big Lie

    So 72 years and the weight of the lie exceeds their payload. And they wonder why people don't believe them about vaccines .

    - tweldyUS January 4, 2010 1:18PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...