WASHINGTON (BP) --- President Obama's executive order March 9 will
drastically expand the federal government's role in embryonic stem cell
research. Following is a list of frequently asked questions, along with
answers, about stem cells.
1. What are stem cells?
cells are the body's master cells from which all cells and tissues are
formed. Because some types of stem cells in theory can develop into any
type of tissue, they seemingly hold the promise to cure diseases and
2. Where are stem cells found?
in two sources: 1) throughout the human body, such as in skin cells,
and 2) in embryos. Stem cells found in the human body are referred to
as "adult stem cells," while stem cells in the second category are
known as "embryonic stem cells." Adult stem cell research is harmless
and is not controversial. Embryonic stem cell research, though,
requires the destruction of embryos and is very controversial.
President Obama's executive order pertained primarily to this second
3. What did President Obama's executive order do?
order overturned President Bush's stem cell limits, which had
prohibited federal funds from being used for conducting research on
embryonic stem cell lines created after Aug. 9, 2001 (the date of
Bush's announcement). Obama's order allows taxpayer dollars to be used
for funding research on hundreds of other embryonic stem cell lines.
Popular VideoThis young teenage singer was shocked when Keith Urban invited her on stage at his concert. A few moments later, he made her wildest dreams come true.
4. Was embryonic stem cell research banned prior to Obama's order?
All embryonic stem cell research has been legal in the private sector,
and some of it (see above) already was receiving federal funding.
5. Didn't Obama say he was opposed to human cloning?
really. Obama appeared to rule out human cloning in his statement, but
he also issued a qualifier. He said, "We will ensure that our
government never opens the door to the use of cloning for human
reproduction." Obama apparently is opposed to reproductive cloning --
that is, the actual cloning of a person whereby a baby is born -- but
he is leaving the door open for federal funds being used for
therapeutic cloning, which is the cloning of an embryo in order to
harvest its stem cells. In other words, he may be for cloning, as long
as the cloned embryo is destroyed. Opponents call it "cloning and
killing." The same laboratory procedure -- known as somatic cell
nuclear transfer -- is used for both types of cloning.
6. Why do some people oppose embryonic stem cell research?
three basic reasons: 1) it requires the destruction of embryos, tiny
human beings, 2) adult stem cell research, thus far, has had more
success, and 3) a new form of stem cell research known as "induced
pluripotent" stem cell research could provide embryonic-like stem cells
without the ethical dilemma. Some opponents of embryonic stem cell
research also say the "extra" embryos used in the research should
instead be given a chance to be adopted in "snowflake" embryo adoption
programs, whereby they would be implanted in a woman and grow into a
7. What are induced pluripotent stem cells?
pluripotent stem cells (iPS) are a new form of stem cells whereby
scientists reprogram adult skin cells into embryonic-like stem cells --
and thus provide scientists with the stem cells they desire without the
need to destroy embryos. Embryos are not destroyed or created during
the process. iPS stem cells were introduced to the world during a
breakthrough announcement in 2007, and on March 2 of this year
scientists announced they had found a better way to make them that
would be safer for patients. One scientist involved in the March 2
announcement said iPS stem cells perhaps could eliminate "the need for
human embryos as a source of stem cells."
8. What does "pluripotent" mean?
term "pluripotent" means the stem cells theoretically can morph into
any of the body's issues. Embryonic stem cells also are pluripotent. By
contrast, adult stem cells are "multipotent," meaning they can morph
into many, though not all, of the body's cell types. iPS stem cells
would have an advantage over embryonic stem cells in that they would
already have the patient's own DNA -- because the patient's skin cell
was used to make them. They would, then, be less likely to be rejected
by the patient's body. There have yet to be any human trials using iPS
9. If induced pluripotent stem cell research shows
so much progress, then why do scientists support embryonic stem cell
Scientists who back research involving embryos say
they are excited about the potential of iPS research but want both
types to be funded to determine which one is more successful.
10. Has embryonic stem cell research in the private sector found any cures?
Scientists have struggled to control embryonic stem cells in the lab.
Often, experiments involving such stem cells in animals have led to
tumors. Bernadine Healy, the head of the National Institutes of Health
under the first President Bush, wrote in a March 4 column for U.S. News
& World Report that "several events" since Obama took office have
"reinforced the notion that embryonic stem cells, once thought to hold
the cure for Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and diabetes, are obsolete." She
pointed in part to the iPS breakthrough.
Popular VideoThis young teenage singer was shocked when Keith Urban invited her on stage at his concert. A few moments later, he made her wildest dreams come true:
11. Has adult stem cell research led to any cures?
scientists who work with adult stem cell research probably wouldn't use
the word "cure," they have seen adult stem cells do wonders in specific
patients. One organization that keeps track of such advances -- known
as Do No Harm -- says adult stem cells have treated 73 different
ailments, including diabetes and leukemia. In fact, most of the
attention-grabbing headlines relating to advances in stem cell research
involve adult stem cells, not embryonic stem cells.
12. How long will it take scientists to find cures involving embryonic stem cells?
one knows, but it likely is years away, at best. In 2006 a California
institute, set up to oversee $3 billion in public embryonic stem cell
funding, released a report with its goals. The report promised no cures
at the end of a 10-year period and said the institute simply hoped to
have "preliminary evidence" from at least one embryonic stem cell trial
at the end of the period. Scientists' understanding of embryonic stem
cells, the report said, is "incomplete."
To see the story on Obama's decision to overturn the stem cell ban, click here
POST YOUR COMMENTS BELOW