Should Medical Marijuana be Federally Legalized?

Should Medical Marijuana be Federally Legalized?

Millions of Americans take prescription drugs to treat a plethora of illnesses and symptoms, but not all drugs are created equal. The question of whether or not to consider marijuana a viable medical treatment remains a hot button issue. In states like California, medical marijuana clubs have flourished despite their federal illegality. Should the federal government allow states to make their own decisions, or is marijuana nothing more than a dangerous narcotic?

Next question in Politics

Dietwatch_med_rectangle_orange

  • “No”
  • “Objection”
  • “Objection”
Expedia_last_minute_travel_wide_sky
Marijuana Policy Project

Smoking is Not the Issue

Marijuana Policy Project

Although the Institute of Medicine, in the passage quoted by Eric Voth, specifically acknowledged that for some patients smoking would be acceptable, safety concerns connected to smoking are not a serious objection to medical use of whole marijuana. Some patients have always used methods other than smoking -- for example, eating marijuana in cooked foods -- but smoking does have advantages. As a review in The Lancet Neurology noted, "Smoking has been the route of choice for
many cannabis users because it delivers a more rapid 'hit' and allows more accurate dose-titration."

Fortunately, the technology exists to achieve the rapid action and ease of dose titration that causes patients to prefer smoking, but without the tars and other unwanted combustion products in smoke. Vaporization takes advantage of the fact that cannabinoids -- the active components that are desired for medicinal purposes -- vaporize at a temperature below that at which marijuana burns. By heating marijuana to the proper temperature, patients get the therapeutic compounds they need without the smoke they don't. This technology has been studied in the peer-reviewed medical literature and discussed in the American College of Physicians' recent position paper. It's time for those who claim to be concerned about the health risks of smoking to help publicize this important technology, rather than simply using smoking as a phony excuse to oppose medical marijuana.

For more information, see below.



Evidence

IcotextText
The Therapeutic Potential of Cannabis
David Baker, Gareth Pryce, Gavin Giovannoni, and Alan J Thompson. "The Therapeutic Potential of Cannabis." The Lancet Neurology. Vol. 2, May 2003.
IcotextText
Supporting Research Into the Therapeutic Role of Marijuana
American College of Physicians. Supporting Research Into the Therapeutic Role of Marijuana. February, 2008.
IcotextText
Evaluation of a Vaporizing Device (Volcano®)...
Hazecamp, A., et al., “Evaluation of a Vaporizing Device (Volcano®) for the Pulmonary Administration of Tetrahydrocannabinol,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, June 2006
IcotextText
Vaporization as a Smokeless Cannabis Delivery System
Abrams DI et al. Vaporization as a Smokeless Cannabis Delivery System: A Pilot Study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov;82(5):572-8.
IcotextText
Decreased Respiratory Symptoms in Cannabis Users...
Earleywine M and Barnwell SS. Decreased Respiratory Symptoms in Cannabis Users Who Vaporize. Harm Reduction Journal. 2007, 4:11.
Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

"No" Dr Voth
"No" Drug Free America
"Yes" Marijuana Policy Project
"Yes" ASA
"Yes" NORML
Most Objections

Marijuana by Prescription?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • Marijuana Policy Project
    Marijuana prohibition has failed. It's time for a new approach, and MPP is leading the way. Since our founding in 1995, we've been making real progress in... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.