Should Medical Marijuana be Federally Legalized?

Should Medical Marijuana be Federally Legalized?

Millions of Americans take prescription drugs to treat a plethora of illnesses and symptoms, but not all drugs are created equal. The question of whether or not to consider marijuana a viable medical treatment remains a hot button issue. In states like California, medical marijuana clubs have flourished despite their federal illegality. Should the federal government allow states to make their own decisions, or is marijuana nothing more than a dangerous narcotic?

Next question in Politics

Dietwatch_med_rectangle_orange

  • “No”
  • “Objection”
  • “Objection”
Expedia_last_minute_travel_wide_sky
ASA

Science, Not Polling Results, Confirm Marijuana's Medical Efficacy

Americans for Safe Access

It's simply not true to say, "There is no scientifically documented benefit for the use of crude marijuana for any medical purposes." In fact, there are literally dozens of studies around the world and in the U.S. that point to marijuana's medical efficacy for a number of ailments. In case you have doubts, refer below to the database of cannabis-related research from the International Association for Cannabis as Medicine (IACM).

Perhaps unknown to the Drug Free America Foundation (DFAF) is that the FDA has approved numerous smoked marijuana studies, which have yielded positive results. One such study was performed by Dr. Donald Abrams at UCSF, which determined that smoked marijuana alleviated neuropathic pain in people living with HIV/AIDS. The problem is that the National Institute for Drug Abuse (NIDA) refuses to provide marijuana for the study, as NIDA holds a monopoly on the production of marijuana in the U.S. This monopoly, and a refusal by NIDA to supply an adequate quantity and quality of marijuana, stifles further research.

Smoking marijuana, which is the main focus of DFAF's argument, is only one method of intake for patients that benefit from medical marijuana. It is extracted to make tinctures (herbs have been sold in tinctures for more than 100 years) and to put in food, both ingested orally, or it can be vaporized, which is a method of heating the herb at a lower temperature than needed to burn it, thereby reducing any potential harm from smoked marijuana.

At the same time, we should not restrict the most popular method of intake because we believe it to be inferior to other methods. There are literally hundreds of thousands of people that currently benefit from smoked marijuana. Why deny ill people the option if it works? Further undermining the argument that smoked marijuana is harmful is a 2006 UCLA study by researcher Dr. Donald Tashkin, which showed that there is “no association at all” between cannabis use and lung cancer.

Post a Comment

Next Argument Previous Next

"No" Drug Free America
"No" Dr Voth
"Yes" Marijuana Policy Project
"Yes" ASA
"Yes" NORML
Most Objections

Marijuana by Prescription?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • Marijuana Policy Project
    Marijuana prohibition has failed. It's time for a new approach, and MPP is leading the way. Since our founding in 1995, we've been making real progress in... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.