Experts and users discuss zoos, animal rights: Modern Zoo Facilities Have Consistently Increased Their Effectiveness
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





Modern Zoo Facilities Have Consistently Increased Their Effectiveness
- From Jack Hanna
By Jack Hanna - Director Emeritus, Columbus Zoo
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Paternalism
This argument assumes that our paternalism is justifiable. I ask, then, to what principle can you appeal to justify this paternalism that shouldn't, to be logically consistent, be extended to humans suffering extreme poverty, hunger, disease, etc. throughout the world? If such a principle cannot be articulated, it's selective reasoning or irrationality at work here.
I would ask further, if the interests of the nonhumans is driving our actions in regard to zoos (as the argument explicitly states) why shouldn't we employ these resources to challenge the paradigm whereby animals are treated as our property? Why not, that is, participate in P.E.T.A.-like advocacy efforts to alter our habits and irrational assumptions and beliefs about nonhumans, which, of course, leads to the endangerment of the gorillas we are now forced to protect?
- Alex M
August 28, 2008 4:43PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.