The death penalty has provoked heated discussion since biblical times, and today the debate remains as controversial as ever. Is such a sentence ever justified? Capital punishment is an intensely emotional topic for everyone involved because it sits at the intersection of life, death and the very definition of the word 'justice.'
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content,
so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't
appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
8
10
7
5
8
3
3
Biweekly updates on new debates and experts
Please check your email to confirm your subscription.
© 2008 Opposing Views, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Opposing Views, Inc. is not responsible for the content posted on this website. Please view full disclaimer under Terms
Deterrent Undeniable
- From Josh Marquis
By Joshua Marquis - District Attorney, Media Commentator
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Why is this pointless?
I agree (see my comment above) that the choice of example locations was not ideal. However, I don't think that invalidates the point, and I think your response to Amnesty's objection actually underscores the argument you are trying to disagree with. Surely if some countries with low murder rates have the death penalty and some do not, or if some densely populated cities with high murder rates have the death penalty and some do not, that demonstrates that the existence of the death penalty is not the primary determiner of murder rate.
- thoughtcounts Z
September 8, 2008 8:40AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Uncommitted
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Weak defense of a fradulent principle
D.A.'s Marquis' argument in favor of capital punishment makes little if any sense.
Deterrence is one of the most fraulent principles in the history of mankind.
A murder is commited for one of 3 following reasons :
1.Profit(hitmen, drug dealers, or killing a spouse for life insurance)
2.Passion(killing a cheating spouse)
3.Compulsion (jeffery dahmer, son of sam, john couey, etc.)
People who kill for profit do it rationally and are convinced they will get away with it.
People who kill in passion cannot weigh risk/reward when they are flipped out.
Finally, and worst, crimes of compulsion are violent acts that you cannot deter because it's a compulsion.
Finally, the notion that a killer's ideas die with them as Marquis points out when he says the executions stop future murders is ridiculous.
You don't believe me? just look at the neo-nazis/fourth reich type stuff.
- zaneman1
June 27, 2009 12:41AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.