Maryland Shouldn't Expand 'Non-Discrimination' Laws

(Opinion) Maryland Shouldn't Expand 'Non-Discrimination' Laws

By FRC

You are seeing 2 Comments. See all 5 Comments on this Opinion.
  • Zoe Brain
    Where does lying by omission begin and slant end?

    Dr McHugh, former advisor to the Vatican on sexual matters, is an expert in the field of addiction. He's never actually treated a case of GID.

    Moreover, his views were published in a religious journal, not a medical one. They're quoted often, because he's almost the only one espousing such views. To say they are "on the fringe' is an understatement.

    It's true that Johns Hopkins no longer provides surgical treatment. Their surgeon left, so they now refer patients with GID elsewhere for surgery. They closed down that section over 25 years ago, before 1980, when Dr McHugh was last involved.

    Some quotes from a real expert on the issue:
    "Q. Dr. Cole, does the fact that a condition is listed in the DSM
    mean that it necessarily has a purely mental or
    psychological cause?
    A. Absolutely not. It's listed in the DSM because it
    has to do with the mind, with the brain, with
    emotional suffering. I mean, you also have learning
    disabilities in there.
    You have, you know, people who have sexual
    problems, a man with erection problems, a woman
    with orgasm problems, that's listed in the DSM, but
    it has nothing to do with somebody being unstable.
    Q. So the fact that gender identity disorder is listed in
    the DSM, does that tell us anything one way or the
    other about whether the condition has a
    physiological or biological cause?
    A. No, it doesn't. It's very controversial even within
    the Benjamin Association to have it listed in the
    DSM. There are many people who argue it should
    be moved over to a medical kind of diagnosis as
    opposed to a psychiatric diagnosis."

    The "Benjamin Association" is now the World Professional Association for Transgender Health. Dr McHugh is not a member, and never has been. He's no more qualified to be than a podiatrist.

    "Dr Cole was asked if he was familiar with the criteria for gender identity disorder in the DSM?
    A. Yes, I am.
    Q. And do those criteria refer exclusively to the
    conflict between the person's gender identity and
    their anatomy as well as distress that conflict
    causes?
    A. Yes.
    Q. Is there anything in those criteria relating to having
    any kind of bizarre or disordered thinking or
    behavior or to any kind of emotional unbalance or
    instability apart from the distress caused by having
    the wrong body?
    A. No.
    Q. So would it be true that being diagnosed with GID
    does not mean that the person is otherwise unstable
    or disturbed or mentally ill?
    A. Absolutely.
    Q. In practice, are transsexual people who have
    completed their gender transition anymore likely to
    have psychological problems than non-transsexual
    people?
    A. No."

    This is all on the public record, in such legal cases as Kantaras vs Kantaras. The Family Research Council is aware of this. However, it doesn't fit their religious viewpoint, so they omit it, instead adducing Dr McHugh and his...eccentric... ideas yet again.

    - Zoe BrainAU February 28, 2009 8:17PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • TinaSD
      Thank you, Zoe for shedding more light on McHugh's prevarications

      It's also important to note that John's Hopkins was also where John Money's egregious medical malfeasance and misreporting of facts in the case of David Reimer's failed sex assignment took place.

      People love to use John's Hopkins shutting down of their gender reassignment programs as some kind of example of what leading authorities think that should end all discussion, but John's Hopkins credibility was irretrievably damaged by Money's treatment of Reimer while on their staff, and even more so by the University's almost complete silence on the matter and failure to punish his outrageous behavior in that case.

      Just wanted to add something regarding the notion that just because GID is listed as a mental disorder that people who have it are somehow crazy...

      Not only is this correct-

      Q. Is there anything in those criteria relating to having
      any kind of bizarre or disordered thinking or
      behavior or to any kind of emotional unbalance or
      instability apart from the distress caused by having
      the wrong body?
      A. No.

      - the fact of the matter is that the main reason psychological counseling is part of the Standards of Care for people presenting with gender identity issues is *specifically* to eliminate the possibility that they are suffering from some profound mental disorder, as there are other conditions that can affect one's self perception in a similar manner like multiple personality disorders and schizophrenia.

      In other words, the people who get past that vetting process and are diagnosed with GID only get there after having shown through clinical observation that they *aren't* crazy.

      - TinaSDUS March 1, 2009 12:22PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.