Experts and users discuss god, religion: whats-wrong-with-god-being-an-hypothesis
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





God is still a hypothesis not a theory
Whats wrong with God being an hypothesis
Science is an hypothesis as well. It is based on the perception that the universe is limited to what we can sense with our 5 senses and instrumentation designed to augment those five senses.
Right now there are thousands of radio and tv and wireless signals going past my head but I cant see or hear or even feel them because i dont have the receiver turned on or tuned to the proper frequency. But regardless of that those signals are there. WHat else is there that I simply do not have a receiver for or am not tuned into. Is there a "spirit of truth and righteousness" that requires a mind that can receive it and a mind that is tuned into the frequency it broadcasts on?
Many people have a "gut feeling" about what is right and wrong, where does it come from. Last nights Spaghetti :-)
Or is there a "spirit of truth and righteousness" is there a concious or subconcious concience that is more than just what we have reasoned from our life experience to be the correct thing to do. We are really good at justifying what we some how know is wrong. IMHO
- james1951
June 28, 2009 11:42AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Testability
To be a true hypothesis you have to be able to devise experiments by which you can demonstrate if it is correct or not.
Radio waves (tv and wireless signals are all in the radio spectrum) cannot be seen, but can be detected and proven to exist.
- MrBook
July 7, 2009 6:15AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Existence detection
They cannot be proven to exist if
1. You do not have instrumentation that can detect them and and relay that information in a manner that our 5 senses can sense them.
2. If you do not have that instrumentation tuned into the frequency those energy signals are transmitting on.
3. There may be many other energy waves than radio tv infra red ultra violet light rays. Thought waves for example, we cannot even read thought waves who, who knows what other energy signals are out there that we simply cannot detect withn our current detection facilities.
Just because you don't know its there does not mean it doesn't exist.
- james1951
July 7, 2009 8:19AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
que?
"
1. You do not have instrumentation that can detect them and and relay that information in a manner that our 5 senses can sense them.
"
yes, that is true... however considering that we know that there are radio broadcasts going on near by (even though I do not have my cell phone on me I know that it gets a signal where I am sitting) I don't think that it is unreasonable to assume that there are radio waves passing through me right now.
"
2. If you do not have that instrumentation tuned into the frequency those energy signals are transmitting on.
"
That is a strange way to put it... but again, yes.
"
3. There may be many other energy waves than radio tv infra red ultra violet light rays.
"
getting stranger now, but also true... there are sound waves to consider for one.
"
Thought waves for example, we cannot even read thought waves
"
Que? It depends on what you mean by 'Thought Waves'... if you are talking about the frequency of electrical signals traveling through the brain you are correct in that we cannot 'read' them. We can detect them but we cannot interpret them.
"
who knows what other energy signals are out there that we simply cannot detect withn our current detection facilities.
"
Also true, however that reasoning allows for an infinite number of possibilities... We 'could' be organic robots controlled by tachyon signals being projected from Saturn.
"
Just because you don't know its there does not mean it doesn't exist.
"
Can't the same thing be said for Unicorns and underwear gnomes?
- MrBook
July 9, 2009 6:43AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.