Experts and users discuss religious symbols, church and state, religion in society, religion and politics: two-sides-to-every-coin
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





Should Religious Symbols be Displayed on Public Property?
Two sides to every coin.
Naturally, the main problem with this issue is offending individuals. Nearly all comments focus on this. However, what if there was a symbol of evolution on public property?
Many choose to look solely at the atheist or other groups that may be offended by any religious symbol of any sort, but what about the other views. Would it be okay to show a symbol of evolution because it is a widely believed theory that has large amounts of credible evidence? Most would answer yes to this, though it may offend some religious groups.
I see NO PROBLEM with allowing religious symbols on public property. I HOPE that it offends people. I want them to question their current beliefs, I want them to have to defend it from what the symbol might proclaim.
If I was jewish, I would want somebody to question my faith. I would want somebody to attack my philosophy. I would feel the same if I was islamic, christian, hindu, etc.
Philosophies need to be attacked, faiths questioned. This is what progresses our thoughts and our ideas. Symbols in public do that very thing.
- ckidwell7098
February 19, 2009 4:16PM
Reply to this Recommend (1)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.