Experts and users discuss alcohol, drinking age, society: thank-you-15
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





The Full "Full Story"
Thank You
I am glad that Choose Responsibility has been successful in convincing you to read further into the sources used by the government. Please let us all know if you find anything in that study that seriously counters CR's arguments.
The fact is that almost all of the statistics used by proponents of the MLDA 21 are before 1995 and are presented incompletely. Since the government and organizations like MADD receive millions of dollars in funding, it isn't surprising that the public has only heard their argument and limited facts.
- PhilyG
January 29, 2009 9:27PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Your welcome
Actually, CR had nothing to do with my reading of this peer-reviewed artile. It's what scientsits do to keep up on the literature. It is disingenuous to fault a study for using the only data available. This was a study on the effects of policy and policies don't change on a regular basis. The data suporting the MLDA-21 laws are overwhelming. Here is the bottom line: lower the MLDA and adverse outcomes increase; raise the MLDA and adverse outcomes decrease. Pretty simple, really!
- JSearles
January 30, 2009 10:10AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.