Net neutrality is the principle that says all information flowing across the Internet should be treated equally. But with more people streaming data-rich video and playing online games, the Internet faces congestion concerns. Should carriers be able to sell multi-tiered access to heavy users? Should sites that generate massive traffic -- like Google and Yahoo! -- pay extra fees? The U.S. Government is examining Net Neutrality and its financial, legal and social implications. Do we need federal intervention to ensure fairness, or is this an issue for the market to work out?
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content,
so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't
appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
Biweekly updates on new debates and experts
Please check your email to confirm your subscription.
© 2008 Opposing Views, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Opposing Views, Inc. is not responsible for the content posted on this website. Please view full disclaimer under Terms
Re-frame the Question
Re: Re-frame the Question
Network Neutrality should be a cornerstone of the Internet. It is born out of the principle of 'Common Carrier' during the days of the Telecom giants. Telecommunications companies were given monopolies over the physical resources (telephone poles/lines) in exchange for maintaining certain levels of service. Now when the internet came along the Telecom companies were in the best position to deliver the internet to the masses. Just because the information transmitted has changed does not mean that the original deal should change as well.
Europe is also doing well because there is strong competition in their markets.
- Concerned Citizen
September 2, 2008 2:46PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Uncommitted
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.