Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content,
so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't
appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
Allowing prayer in public schools remains a compelling and often heated issue for many Americans. Is a student-led Lord's Prayer acceptable before the big game on Friday night? What about a two-minute "moment of silence" during home room? Of course, this isn't simply a matter of prayer itself but a representation of a much larger, more encompassing topic: Where does the line exist between religious freedom and religious imposition?
Biweekly updates on new debates and experts
Please check your email to confirm your subscription.
© 2008-2010 Opposing Views, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Opposing Views, Inc. is not responsible for the content posted on this website. Please view full disclaimer under Terms
Too Often, Schools Choose Censorship Over Religious Expression
Not censorship....
Prayer in schools has never been abolished. Anyone can pray to whatever object they wish, anytime they wish, so long as they aren't being disruptive. However, evangelizing/proselytizing is definitely crossing the line of what is acceptable and what isn't. Brittany McComb's rights weren't violated; she continued her speech, though it was disrespectful to the people who believed otherwise. So, her free speech rights weren't violated, she just didn't have any special right to a microphone or an audience. If believers want to pray and share their faith among like-minded people, that's fine, but imposing it on a somewhat captive audience is unconscionable.
- aveteran
June 9, 2009 1:39AM
Reply to this Recommend
(2)
Side: No
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.