Should Marriage for Same Sex Couples be Legal?

Should Marriage for Same Sex Couples be Legal?

The tide of marriage for same-sex couples has ebbed and flowed over the last decade with no end in sight. Because marriage sits squarely at the intersection of religion, law and society, the discussion around same-sex couples’ inclusion into the institution of marriage has been one of the most complex and hotly contested topics in America.

Next question in Society

You are seeing 26 Comments. See all 428 Comments on this Question.
Regarding Comment
Yes, and because
  • popabear
    No,and because

    It is not right it is not the way it should be or it wouldn't be a problem men are suppose to be with women and women with men otherwise it wouldn't be a taboo. But regraurdless of who is right or wrong the day will we will all find out for sure and then it'll be too late for the Gay's of the world I know my son brings a men homei'll disown him and shooot his whatever u call them.

    - popabearUS November 4, 2009 9:45AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • Babaroni
      Keep talking

      Keep talking, popabear, and show the world what bigotry looks like. You're doing a great job of it.

      - BabaroniUS November 4, 2009 9:58AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • popabear
        get ur facts right!!!!

        Irrational suspicion or hatred of a particular group, race , or religion : intolerance, prejudice. See like/dislike.

        This is what bigotry means and I never said I dislike queers,gay's or whatever you like to call them big mouth I just said it wasn't right and I did not approve of there belief and I will condemn it in my household because I can Wanna be gay fine just not in my house and if it isn't wrong why was it hidden from population for so long yes yes I know it goes waY back in history but as far back in histry as it goes so is someone tring to hide it.

        - popabearUS November 4, 2009 11:27AM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • Babaroni
          Other than

          Other than threatening to shoot your son 's hypothetical gay partner, you mean? No, that's not hateful. That's not intolerant or prejudiced. Not at all.

          - BabaroniUS November 4, 2009 11:45AM

          Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • popabear
            Nope

            No I do not I give everyone a fair chance to prove themselves as people not labels but at the same time detest anyone who screws with my plans and, and my plans are for my son to give me grandchildren ( blood kin ) so anyone who goes against that or any other plans that I have is an enemy and will be dealt as such.

            - popabearUS November 4, 2009 11:58AM

            Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

            • Babaroni
              Your son

              Your son can still give you "blood kin" grandchildren, even if he is gay. I am gay, and I gave birth to my children . Men who are gay frequently father children by the same means used by couples with infertility, and raise them.

              The problem for you is that, if your son turns out to be gay, he will know exactly how you feel, and, though he may very well father your grandchildren, he will very likely not let you anywhere near them or his spouse. So you will lose not only your son, but your grandchildren, as well. How very sad for you.

              - BabaroniUS November 4, 2009 1:02PM

              Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

              Thank You for your Comment

              We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

              • popabear
                Then so be it

                I figured u was queer why esle would you care about what i think...Reguardless I wouldn't want anything to do with them ( my son ) or his but buddy and I would take him to court for my right's to my grandchild and do what ever I could to get them away from them it is not right and that is the buttom line if it was right noone would care who did what.Your problem and ever other gay person in this world thinks because u think it is right it should be ok .....well it's not.

                - popabearUS November 4, 2009 1:51PM

                Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

                Thank You for your Comment

                We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • Argenious
      They don't get it...

      Homosexuality is a perversion from the norm. Perhaps we should let pedophiles have their way? Or Necrophiliacs have their way? MANSA claim they love sex with boys, so lets just let all perversions be accepeted! In the name of love of course... that makes it all OK!

      - Argenious November 4, 2009 5:49PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • MrBook
        quite different

        Homosexuality may not be the sexual orientation of the majority, but it is hardly a perversion.

        As to the standard claim about paedophilia and homosexuality ... you are aware that most paedophiles are heterosexual?

        Paedophilia differs from homosexuality in one very important respect... by definition paedophilia requires a non-consenting partner (as minors cannot consent to sexual activity), homosexuality does not share that requirement.

        - MrBookUS November 4, 2009 7:43PM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • CitizenZebra
          You are mistaken

          Pedophilia is the abnormal sexual attraction to children , not a sexual act... has nothing to do with consent.

          Normal: In accordance with scientific laws; Conforming with or constituting a norm or standard or level or type or social norm; not abnormal, et al...

          Abnormal: Not normal; not typical or usual or regular or conforming to a norm; not conforming to the natural course of...

          Homosexuality and pedophilia are abnormal sexual behaviours.

          You need a refresher course in Human Sexuality 101.

          - CitizenZebraUS November 4, 2009 8:29PM

          Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • popabear
            Thanks

            I really had no idea what the hell that other person was going on about but you cleared it up perfectly thanks for enlighting me.

            - popabearUS November 5, 2009 11:14AM

            Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • MrBook
            laws?

            "Pedophilia is the abnormal sexual attraction to children , not a sexual act... has nothing to do with consent."

            We are not talking about those who just think, but those who are putting their desires into action.

            Homosexuality does not violate any scientific laws, but with lets look at some other things that are unnatural... Blue eyes are abnormal, left handedness is abnormal, living in Ohio is abnormal, liking Carolina style BBQ is abnormal, having a PhD is abnormal.

            By defining abnormal as 'something that deviates from the statistical norm' it expands to encompass a huge range of human activities... losing it's negative connotation.

            - MrBookUS November 5, 2009 6:46PM

            Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

            • CitizenZebra
              All I can say to you...

              you don't seem to be able to stay connected to a definition, you rather make up your own as you go. Illogical and irrational is the best way to describe your comments! You are arguing your opinion rather than facts.

              - CitizenZebraUS November 5, 2009 8:28PM

              Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

              Thank You for your Comment

              We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

              • MrBook
                definitions?

                I am using your definition, not my own.

                You say that homosexuality violates a Scientific law ... and I ask which one?

                "Abnormal: Not normal; not typical or usual or regular or conforming to a norm; not conforming to the natural course of..."

                To which I state that a large number of things are abnormal, but that does not imply that something that is abnormal is 'wrong' or 'bad' in some way.

                - MrBookUS November 5, 2009 9:03PM

                Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

                Thank You for your Comment

                We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • Argenious
          wrong

          Pay particular attention to CZ's explanation, he is absolutely correct.

          - Argenious November 4, 2009 8:32PM

          Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • Argenious
      The subjects of sexual deviancy...

      always have an argument that it is OK, normal, acceptable etc. Probably the most significant cause for the aversion to homosexuality are displays like "Gay Pride", the parades on the streets of Frisco where radical nudity and simulated sex acts by homosexuals are publicly displayed.

      - Argenious November 5, 2009 7:58AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: No

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

Spotlight

Loading
  • ADF
    ADF is a legal alliance of more than 1,200 Christian attorneys and 300 like-minded organizations defending the right of people to freely live out their faith.... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.