Should the Government Regulate Net Neutrality?

Should the Government Regulate Net Neutrality?

Net neutrality is the principle that says all information flowing across the Internet should be treated equally. But with more people streaming data-rich video and playing online games, the Internet faces congestion concerns. Should carriers be able to sell multi-tiered access to heavy users? Should sites that generate massive traffic -- like Google and Yahoo! -- pay extra fees? The U.S. Government is examining Net Neutrality and its financial, legal and social implications. Do we need federal intervention to ensure fairness, or is this an issue for the market to work out?

Next question in Society

This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


You are seeing 1 Comment. See all 42 Comments on this Question.
  • tomcat2200
    Net neutrality can't exist yet, the FCC has already blown it away

    As long as the FCC gives Comcast and other bad actors reserved markets, that no one else can compete in, then there will be no market forces to force them to comply with good faith operations.

    I live in Portland, and no one other than Quest who offers low, or no speed, services is allowed to compete in the market. Just 2 miles south of the city, Verizon offers rural users 50Mb down and 20 Mb up speeds,all the while Comcast trumpets their fiber optic networks while giving customers 6Mb and 8 Mb down speeds, and up speeds not much better than DSL.

    Comcast burns off more resources on line trying to "manage" its customers than the customers are allowed to use themselves. Comcast is trying to turn net traffic sharing with other ISP's into a profit center in the name of "managing" their network traffic.

    Quite litterally the government is already regulating out the net neutrality, by giving Comcast free reign in a false regulatory economy created by FCC regulations and restrictions for any others to compete in the market.

    I find it astounding, that a market the size of the city of Portland, is allowed to be the sole domain of Comcast. All the while Comcast has a marketing team for determining the least amount of services for the maximum prices. This should have been an open market years ago.

    Comcast cries network congestion, with a user density many times higher than the rural towns to the south, yet can't or won't convert the revenues into services as other companies have with less of a user base. What is ironic, is that Comcast could clear the congestion by providing the higher speeds, and less "management" by Comcast marketing. Internet data flow agreements were not designed to be turned into profit centers for the ISP's. Comcast is already charging their customers more than they need to for the inferior services they provide, even withiout having to layer on top of that, some contrived "management" of its users.

    Comcast will always seek to provide the least for the most revenue. They are a bad corporate actor in American business. They will never do anything in good faith, and they will never seek to provide services based on merit.

    Until the Comcast markets are opened up to real competition, by the FCC revoking their "exclusive" regulatory territories, then there cannot be any semblance of anything like net neutrality. The government needs to open the territories to competition. At least for the city of Portland they do. It is the government regulation that has already created this sad state of affairs. As long as the government regulation has kept this in place, it requires government regulation to fix it.

    - tomcat2200US September 13, 2008 11:52PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

Regulate Net Neutrality?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • Public Knowledge
    Public Knowledge is a public-interest advocacy organization dedicated to fortifying and defending a vibrant information commons. This Washington, D.C. based... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.