Experts and users discuss drug law, drug laws: legal-doesnt-equate-to-laudable
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





Making Cannabis More Available Might Actually Reduce Use
Legal Doesnt Equate to Laudable
Because something is legal does not automatically make it laudable.
Increase use doesn't necessarily equate to an increase in net harm either.
Set and Setting do define harm risk (a point that prohibitors prefer to overlook). Making cannabis [use] less stigmatized would enable quality epidemiological research.
A patient (or recreational user, practicing preventative early intervention) has a fundamental right to 'informed consent', where fully informed is fully armed and consent is 'self determination'.
I would expect a reported increase in use post ANY prohibitory regime. That should surprise no one.
But at least a little bit of pot sitting somewhere hurting no one will cease to lead to arrest and incarceration and the life long stigma of a conviction for what MOST thinking people believe to be 'of little matter'.
- MildGreens July 28, 2009 4:48PM
Reply to this Recommend (1)
Side: Decrease Drug Use
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.