Opposing Views: Issues, Experts, Answers

OPINION: Feds' Top Pot Researcher Says Marijuana Should Be Legal

By National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws , Working to Reform Marijuana Laws - June 18, 2009

Comments(6) | (1)

LOS ANGELES --- A University of California researcher who has performed US-government sponsored studies of marijuana and lung function for over 30 years says that pot should be legal . In an interview with the McClatchy newspaper chain, Donald Tashkin of the UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, said: "[A]t this point, I'd be in favor of (marijuana) legalization. I wouldn't encourage anybody to smoke any substances. But I don't think it ... Read the Full Article

Read More on: drug law, drug law, drug law, drug law, crime, marijuana, politics, the law

You are seeing 6 Comments. See all 11 Comments on this Article.

Regarding Comment

Interesting...

Its not everyday...

We see actual US studies, especially long term, that come down on this side of the medical science debate.

We need more research, and there are many institutions who apply every year only to be turned down by the DEA. Seems that the agency in charge of enforcing drug law should not be in charge of research into said drug. It should be the FDA.
At least UMass in Amherst got their go ahead, finally.

- tRANIS June 19, 2009 1:17PM

Reply to this Recommend (0)

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
- In charge of what?
  
  In what capacity is the DEA in charge of researching the science surrounding long-term drug effects? The actual research or the grants for research, or approval to research legally? I really don't know.
  
  - SolarSanitizer June 19, 2009 1:23PM
  
  Reply to this Recommend (0)
  
  Thank You for your Comment
  
  We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
  - They don't research
    
    They block everyone else from doing research. They have pretty much the approval power to allow research and they consistantly block or tie it up for years. I can post some links. Surely not all but a start of the paper trail
    
    http://www.maps.org/mmj /
    http://www.maps.org/mmj/DEAlawsuit.html
    http://ga0.org/drcnet/alert-description.tcl?alert_id=10201889
    
    - tRANIS June 19, 2009 1:29PM
    
    Reply to this Recommend (0)
    
    Thank You for your Comment
    
    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
    - Not Everyone.
      
      The first link took me to a MAPS page where they talked about DEA-licensed labs. Someone must get clearance to study. Furthermore MAPS is researching vaporized marijuana (among other things, like bongs).
      
      I hope like 'ell they get their clearance from whomever Obama posts in the DEA.
      
      I used to smoke cigarettes , but now I vape. e-cig is the best thing to happen to tobacco since fire, and I am sure it can make ingestion of marijuana healthier, just as it has tobacco.
      
      - SolarSanitizer June 19, 2009 1:58PM
      
      Reply to this Recommend (0)
      
      Thank You for your Comment
      
      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
  - Approval
    
    Too do any study you must submit an outline of your study,with the projected results to the DEA for approval and to receive the government raised pot to use in your study.
    They put the agency charged with the removal of all drugs from American streets with the final approval or denial on all studies
    and as any bureaucratic organization will do,they are protecting their turf when they refuse any medical testing of any drug.
    
    - Clay June 21, 2009 3:26PM
    
    Reply to this Recommend (0)
    
    Thank You for your Comment
    
    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
- they got the wrong results.
  
  This was not a study to find good in marijuana ,the study was approved because they thought they would find a direct connection
  to pot smoking and cancer . The same as with tobacco smoke,only the statistics and results didn't go as the DEA and NIDA had hoped
  and it left them paying for a study that helped pots medical claims.
  We should all send thank you notes for this study to those organizations.
  
  - Clay June 21, 2009 3:12PM
  
  Reply to this Recommend (0)
  
  Thank You for your Comment
  
  We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.