Should the U.S. Use Military Force Against Iran?

Should the U.S. Use Military Force Against Iran?

Once a distant, mysterious land, the U.S. has become intensely embroiled in Middle Eastern politics. While simultaneously waging campaigns in both Afghanistan and Iraq, America has turned a wary eye to Iran and its alleged nuclear weapons. With the lives of potentially thousands of soldiers and citizens at stake in both countries, should the U.S. take direct military action against Iran?

Next question in War on Terror

You are seeing 2 Comments. See all 110 Comments on this Question.
  • fromholland
    islamists not keen on admitting defeat

    The islamic ideology is not just confined to Iran. It is an agressive ideology that since 14 centuries has spread all over the world and will not suddenly disappear when Iran is attacked. Islamists play the victim-card already and will use every attack to convince muslims to fight for islam.

    Best thing to do is a largescale support for reformists (inside and outside Iran) to fight their regime from within, including the sabotage of nuclear installations, and convincing and educating ignorants.

    By the way: why does the world accept all this haughty talk about human rights in Europe and America from islamic regimes in de UN who actually violate all these rights (beheadings, hangings, torture, no rigths for minorities) in their own countries?? I think it's time Europe and America turned their backs on this deformed UN!

    - fromholland September 6, 2008 4:28AM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • Sarrisan
      Only Unconditional Victory can Win

      >> "The islamic ideology is not just confined to Iran. It is an agressive ideology that since 14 centuries has spread all over the world and will not suddenly disappear when Iran is attacked. Islamists play the victim-card already and will use every attack to convince muslims to fight for islam."

      This is an often reasonable consideration - that they will simply play the victim and win support for their cause. But the only reason their even _have_ a cause, is because of decades of appeasement, from both the US and Europe. If they are shown that, finally, a strong power (In this case the US) will not abide the existence of such an aggressive ideology, then, far from triggering an influx of followers, it will show them that there can be no victory. But this can only happen if they are shown that the US is committed, 100% to use any means to attain victory. Any holding back will only be seen as a sign of weakness.

      >> "By the way: why does the world accept all this haughty talk about human rights in Europe and America from islamic regimes in de UN who actually violate all these rights (beheadings, hangings, torture, no rigths for minorities) in their own countries?? I think it's time Europe and America turned their backs on this deformed UN!"

      On this, we are wholeheartedly in agreement.

      - SarrisanUS September 6, 2008 10:40AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

U.S. Military in Iran?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.