Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content,
so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't
appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
Allowing prayer in public schools remains a compelling and often heated issue for many Americans. Is a student-led Lord's Prayer acceptable before the big game on Friday night? What about a two-minute "moment of silence" during home room? Of course, this isn't simply a matter of prayer itself but a representation of a much larger, more encompassing topic: Where does the line exist between religious freedom and religious imposition?
Biweekly updates on new debates and experts
Please check your email to confirm your subscription.
© 2008-2010 Opposing Views, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Opposing Views, Inc. is not responsible for the content posted on this website. Please view full disclaimer under Terms
Student Initiated Religious Expression is Constitutional Free Speech
Indubidably
As the Supreme Court has decided that a religious affliation or acknowledgment of a "God" by a faculty/staff member of a school as unconstitutional, who is to say that the students themselves should be a part of that clause? Students, though they may be denied some of their constitutional rights, such as the search and seizure clause, this does not restrict their right to freedom of expression. Who says a student should not be able to discuss religion or bring up a controversial aspect involving religion? No one. As long as the teacher remains the devil's advocate, the students should be free to debate as they so choose.
- LeeLee
February 22, 2009 8:36PM
Reply to this Recommend
(0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.