Medical Marijuana Advocates Hail New Fed Guidelines as Big Win

(News) Medical Marijuana Advocates Hail New Fed Guidelines as Big Win

By ASA

You are seeing 4 Comments. See all 6 Comments on this News.
  • SolarSanitizer
    I don't understand how this is a victory.

    The details were not released ... How can there be a victory when we don't even know the new federal position?

    - SolarSanitizerUS October 19, 2009 12:57AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • caelum
      They Jumped The Gun

      but it looks like they were correct in being happy, assuming the AP is correct:

      http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_MEDICAL_MARIJUANA?SITE=TXKER&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

      I'm uncomfortable on this just from a principle stance. We are a federalist government . Federal law hold supremacy over state law. To not enforce federal law because of conflicting state law just sits badly with me from a precedent stand point. I feel like if the administration doesn't want these prosecuted, rather than doing it the cheap way they should push to make a law that gives state authority over these matters - or at the very least try that first before going this route.

      Granted, I feel that the many overburdened DA's office have better cases to deal with; I would never send out a memo saying "don't prosecute this crime ." And I doubt this is really about alleviating the overburdening of our DA's anyway since they are plenty of other crimes that could be cited. Basically, this is the administrations way of taking the cheap way out on this issue while still appeasing some of their base on the issue of medical marijuana (strong advocates,tend to be more on the liberal side in my experience, but I don't have stats to support that).

      - caelumUS October 19, 2009 1:19AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • SolarSanitizer
        I feel strange about it also.

        Seems like Obama's administration is saying in effect: Go ahead and allow it, just not officially." Seems that the rules could change with the political winds.

        It is like a cop offering to drag race with you. Sure you are ' safe ' during the race, unofficially; but will he arrest you and impound your car if you beat him?

        Smells like shady Chicago politics to me.

        - SolarSanitizerUS October 19, 2009 2:10AM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • tatoo1fresh
        The U.S. is not exactly a Federalist Gov't

        States have rights as well. Each state is free to pass their own laws. Even those laws that conflict with the Federal Governments policies. In fact, states do this all the time. States are free to change or amend laws at the local level. If the two groups disagree, then it is up to the courts to decide which side must comply or not. Big Brother often throws its weight around but eventually it is the will of the people that must prevail. As it often does.

        With these Checks and Balances in place our country often moves forward with bigger and better ideals. Change is the hallmark of our institution, it is the biggest reason why we no longer have slavery. As we learn and grow we become enlightened.

        Good Day!

        - tatoo1freshUS October 19, 2009 4:52AM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.