Should the U.S. Use Military Force Against Iran?

Should the U.S. Use Military Force Against Iran?

Once a distant, mysterious land, the U.S. has become intensely embroiled in Middle Eastern politics. While simultaneously waging campaigns in both Afghanistan and Iraq, America has turned a wary eye to Iran and its alleged nuclear weapons. With the lives of potentially thousands of soldiers and citizens at stake in both countries, should the U.S. take direct military action against Iran?

Next question in War on Terror

You are seeing 5 Comments. See all 110 Comments on this Question.
Regarding Comment
Blackwater Terrorists
  • Hey Its Todd
    False premise

    >>A mercenary is intrinsically no less moral than a soldier.
    Perhaps they don't start that way, but given that the mercenary contract killers have not beenn bound by either the US Military Code nor the laws of the occupied country, do you think there is any 'moral' force guiding these invaders?

    As for whether they are terrorists, from the Iraqi population's perspective, they sure as hell are - they are armed invaders roaming the country with no governing force to moderate their behaviors.

    - Hey Its Todd August 18, 2008 3:42PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag Side: No

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • Mr Cropper
      Nationalist sentiment

      >>As for whether they are terrorists, from the Iraqi population's perspective, they sure as hell are

      Actually, the insurgency is being carried out by soldiers from Iran, Syria and other countries.

      Many Germans in WWII welcomed the American invasion. The same applies to Iraq: just because it is "their" country doesn't necessarily mean they support it and oppose invaders.

      To suggest that Iraqis automatically oppose America is to suggest they are incapable of thinking.

      - Mr Cropper August 20, 2008 10:27AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag Side: Yes

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • betterth
        You're wrong and have no proof

        You have absolutely no proof that Iranians and Syrians are in Iraq, fighting the Coalition. You have no proof because no proof exists. If they were doing that, we'd already be at war. Our trigger happy Vice-President would have made the case for war eons ago, if he could have.The fact is, when you illegally invade a country and kill over a hundred thousand civilians, people get angry. And people fight back.

        If China invaded America, destroyed our cities and killed millions of people, would you fight the Chinese? Would you do whatever it took, guerrilla warfare and home made bombs, to fight against the foreign aggressors? Of course you would. And the Chinese would label you as terrorists, as insurgents. They would say, we won this war, but insurgents are still killing our troops. They're cowardly and hide behind their Christianity to rationalize their actions.

        How is this any different?

        - betterthUS August 22, 2008 8:17AM

        Reply to this Recommend (2) Icon flag Side: No

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • Mr Cropper
          Iraqi resistance?

          On youtube, there is a video called "Case for War: In Defense of Freedom" in 7 parts.

          On part 4 of 7, at 1:05, an IRANIAN man talks about how he hugged his father and cried tears of joy upon learning that the U.S.A. had named Iran an "Axis of Evil" country.

          That's right, he was HAPPY that America has become aware of the evil nature of his government. Not ALL the people in the Mid-East are so dim as to be unable to realize the abusive nature of the tyrants who rule them.

          The Iraqis would gladly return to peace, but the Iranian and Syrian streams of weapons and fighters are keeping Iraq in chaos.

          - Mr Cropper August 22, 2008 11:29AM

          Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag Side: Yes

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • reckoner
            iraqi reality

            Iraq is composed of three different ethnic groups/factions. Two of which hate each other. The majority of bloodshed in Iraq is a result of this, not Iran and Syria.

            - reckonerUS August 27, 2008 8:46AM

            Reply to this Recommend (2) Icon flag Side: No

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

U.S. Military in Iran?

Loading
  • Yes
  • No
Vote
View Results

Ask Your Friends to Vote

Spotlight

Loading
  • David Bukay
    David Bukay (Ph.D.), teaches at the School of Political Science in the University of Haifa. His main fields are: International Terrorism and Islamic fanaticism;... More

Subscribe to Opposing News

Biweekly updates on new debates and experts

Loading
Thank you for signing up

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.