Experts and users discuss nuclear, energy: competing-for-last-place
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





Is Nuclear Power America's Best Energy Alternative?
Competing for last place?
It's interesting to read that our key energy sources are competing for "last place" and that "in the long run" we need to come up with a sustainable plan. That argument sounds solid, but it actually eludes the responsibility of dealing with the here and now.
Just how long will this "long run" you're speaking of take? When will you present us with a "sustainable energy plan" that an average person can 1) rely on, and 2) afford? A decade, a century?
We would all love to go to a time where we can provide limitless energy with no impacts of any sort. Kind of a Star Trek future where we can order up our food and energy from a divot in the wall. Who wouldn't want that?
However, coal, nuclear, and other energy sources are providing abundant energy in the here and now AND doing so in an affordable and clean manner. At the same time, we're working toward the future and finding new ways to make that energy even more affordable, secure, and clean.
- ACC
July 11, 2008 2:08PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Uncommitted
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.