Experts and users discuss popular vote, electoral college, politics: argument-logically-lacking
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose. See our privacy policy.





Popular Election Ensures that the Winner will Win
Argument Logically Lacking
The author said, "Four times in our history, most recently in 2000, the candidate who received the most votes lost the presidency."
This statement is emotionally powerful, but it assumes what is to be proven. Four times the candidate who received the most -popular- votes did not win the presidency. At no point has the person with the most electoral votes lost.
"When our nation selects a leader that does not have the support of the majority of its citizens," ignores how few people actually vote.
"undermines the very principle of one-person, one-vote that our democracy is built upon."
We don't have a democracy. We have a republic.
I'm not arguing against your position. It's just your argument is full of gaping holes and circular logic.
- ChrisB
April 26, 2009 7:39AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Uncommitted
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.