OPINION: Working Moms and the Dual Income Trap

By Suzanne Venker , Author - May 26, 2009

Comments(1) | (0)
In Kiplinger's June 2009 issue there's an article titled "Goodbye City Life," by Elizabeth Ody. It tells about a Manhattan lawyer who quit her high-powered job to spend more time with her family and start a less demanding career at home: baking. Like many women today, Felicia Fisher has decided she wants a simpler life; so she started the Black Buggy Baking Company out of her home. Most of her work is done by 8:00 am -- 11:00 am on a bad day. "Although losing her salary was an adjustment ... Read the Full Article
This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


You are seeing 1 Comment. See all 5 Comments on this Article.
  • Suzanne Venker
    Addendum

    To the woman who pointed out that I'm "looking at this from an upper-middle class viewpoint": You're right. And I should have pointed that out in my article. If one spouse makes 30 or 40K a year, then it would not be a financial trap for the other spouse to get a job.

    Of course this only applies if the parents in question do not have young children , or if they have free child care for their young children. Otherwise, half the second income will be eaten up by having to pay someone else to care for your child while you're at work.

    This distinction is critical and goes unexamined in our society . Returning to work once children are in school can certainly be advantageous financially. But the working mother debate is not about this scenario. It is, in fact, about "upper middle class" women who choose to work despite having young children at home. This has always been the demographic I've targeted.

    This particular article here wasn't meant to tell women what they should do. Rather, it was meant to point out that if a mother wants to stay home it's often more possible than they think. Upper-middle class women do have options, but they claim they don't. Instead, they compare themselves with women who make 30K a year to supplement their husband's 30K a year salary -- as if both mothers work for the same reason. This is disingenuous at best. In fact the folks who "scrape by" making 50K a year combined salary should be irritated by the working mother debate -- because it really has nothing to do with them.

    Maybe that's why the parents I know who both work to make a 50-60K salary are not bothered by my arguments. Many of them would like to stay home if they could. But the working mother debate bundles these two groups -- those who must work with those who choose to -- and cry foul. Yet the two have nothing to do with one another.

    The topic of working mothers is much more complex than people realize -- and much too complicated to analyze in one article. For more information about the subject, please visit www.suzannevenker.com .

    - Suzanne Venker May 27, 2009 6:41PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.