Will Congress Endorse GLSEN's Day of Silence?

By Illinois Family Institute , Upholding Marriage and Family - April 06, 2009

Icoemail3
Comments(8) | (0)
Being an eternal optimist, every time some execrable cultural event takes place, I think, finally this will be the event that awakens the conservative masses from their moral slumber. As each travesty passes, however, and another one arrives with nary a peep from the conservative masses, I'm beginning to wonder if we've ingested a lethal dose of Ambien.

We now have openly homosexual and cross-dressing public school administrators, teachers, and support staff in elementary, middle, and high schools. We have publicly funded schools whose central identifying feature is their philosophical commitment to affirming homosexual and cross-dressing behaviors. We have elementary schools reading picture books to our little ones in which sexual perversion is portrayed as morally equivalent to heterosexuality. We have a California law that requires that homosexuality and "transgenderism" be presented positively from kindergarten through high school. We have the Massachusetts Supreme Court deciding that parents have no right to be notified when elementary school teachers will present pro-homosexual resources to children and no right to opt their children out of class when such resources are presented.

We have medical professionals facilitating the creation of children for homosexual couples -- children who are being denied their fundamental right to be raised by both their mother and their father. We are allowing homosexual couples to adopt children. We have activist judges usurping the will of the people to impose their own radical, subversive moral views by absurdly ruling traditional marriage unconstitutional. We have feckless government employees illegally issuing marriage licenses to homosexual couples when only state legislatures-not judges-can change marital laws. We have a lesbian law professor from Georgetown University telling us in plain, unambiguous language that when same-sex marriage is legalized, conservative people of faith will lose religious rights.

And still we remain silent.

Well, here's one more insidious, incremental step on the march to widespread cultural approbation of sexual deviance: There is a resolution before Congress asking the federal government and all public schools to officially recognize and celebrate the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network's Day of Silence and its pernicious goals, which extend far beyond the elimination of bullying.

Promoters of the Day of Silence are successfully seducing the public into believing that this day of public school political protest is centrally about bullying. It's not. It's centrally about using public resources to transform the views of children and teens on the morality of volitional homosexual and cross-dressing behavior. When promoters of the Day of Silence assert that its purpose is to end bullying, they conveniently avoid saying that the means they use to end bullying are to affirm volitional homosexual acts as normal and good.

Public schools should combat bullying, and they can do so without ever mentioning behaviors that many taxpayers view as disordered and immoral.

Read this and weep for our nation and our children. Then do something:

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That Congress--

(1) supports the goals and ideals of the National Day of Silence;
(2) requests that the President issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe the National Day of Silence with appropriate ceremonies, programs, and activities; and
(3) encourages each State, city, and local education authority to adopt laws and policies to prohibit name-calling, bullying, harassment, and discrimination against students, teachers, and other school staff regardless of their sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, so that the Nation's schools are institutions where all individuals are able to focus on learning.


Remember, cultural change rarely if ever happens through dramatic single events, but rather through the slow accretion of little events that we ignore or dismiss.
This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


Regarding Article
OPINION: Will Congress Endorse GLSEN's Day of Silence?

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • QuinceyQuick
    The irony.

    And you wonder why you were listed as a hate group.

    - QuinceyQuickUS April 6, 2009 6:17PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • QuinceyQuick
    What logic?


    (1) supports the goals and ideals of the National Day of Silence;
    (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe the National Day of Silence with appropriate ceremonies, programs, and activities; and
    (3) encourages each State, city, and local education authority to adopt laws and policies to prohibit name-calling, bullying, harassment, and discrimination against students, teachers, and other school staff regardless of their sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, so that the Nation's schools are institutions where all individuals are able to focus on learning.

    Let's see if I can follow your logic here.

    The Day of Silence was created so people wouldn't be bullied on the basis of sexual orientation.

    Congress wants to pass recognition of Day of Silence, because they don't want people bullied on the basis of sexual orientation.

    You're against Congress passing this.

    So, in other words, you think that people -should- be bullied on the basis of sexual orientation.

    And you wonder why you're considered a hate group!

    - QuinceyQuickUS April 6, 2009 6:47PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Zoe Brain
    Here's why it's needed

    Advisor to the Conservative group NARTH, Dr Joseph Berger:

    "I suggest, indeed, letting children who wish go to school in clothes of the opposite sex — but not counseling other children to not tease them or hurt their feelings.

    On the contrary, don’t interfere, and let the other children ridicule the child who has lost that clear boundary between play-acting at home and the reality needs of the outside world. Maybe, in this way, the child will re-establish that necessary boundary."

    It's because some conservative people believe that bullying in a Good Cause is not just acceptable, but praiseworthy.

    I'm a conservative. But these people do not speak for me, I know they exist though, even if you do not. There is a genuine need here, it's not some "Liberal fantasy". People like Dr Berger are no record as supporting bullying. This must cease.

    - Zoe BrainAU April 7, 2009 9:59AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Catalina
    Congress endorses culture of death. Is that new?

    If congress has no clue that human beings are different than animals ,(so lets do it as they do on the Discovery channel);
    If they are convinced that our only purpose in this planet is shallow pleasure; if they can't tell the difference between lust & love, how can we expect them not to endorse GLSEN's day of silence, or abortion , or give condoms to your elementary kids in treat bags, or any other idea that suggests that people should behave with any kind of integrity?

    You can only give what you have.

    - CatalinaUS April 7, 2009 5:25PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • QuinceyQuick
      "Lust & Love"

      "if they can't tell the difference between lust & love"

      Indeed! Most people think that true love is defined by gender barriers. Or that, if you fall in love with someone of the same gender, you can somehow replace them with someone of the opposite gender. Bizarre, no?

      - QuinceyQuickUS April 7, 2009 6:55PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Janek3615
    Meretricious Resolution

    This resolution is straight out of the pages of Joseph Goebbels capacity for creating mendacious situations. There is no reason for a federal resolution on this newly discovered social phenomenon except to further promote the pansexual agenda that is undermining our society . One might as well create a Day of Silence to remember those who are bullied because they are wearing jeans from Target rather than Gap.

    - Janek3615US April 7, 2009 5:37PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • QuinceyQuick
      Why not?

      If children were wearing jeans from Target and being murdered in the streets by the thousands (according to the UCS or NIBRS) because of their style, why not?

      You don't need a reason to fight against organized violence.

      - QuinceyQuickUS April 7, 2009 6:51PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • zman676
    Gender stereotype much?

    what is wrong with girls wearing pants and guys wearing dress's (kilts*shrug*)

    Also Transgenderism is a actual physical and mental condition that is backed up by every mental organization. -even though it really is a physical condition not a mental one-

    - zman676US April 16, 2009 12:49AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...