WASHINGTON --- On the 30th
anniversary of the
hostage
crisis in Iran, the Iranian
government planned rallies to demonize America.
Anti-Khamenei protestors had a different plan, though, using the occasion to
denounce the oppressive Islamic dictator. The opposition even addressed Obama,
chanting, “Obama, Obama, you are either with us or with them," according
to the
Wall Street Journal.
What was the administration’s response? They called for “moving forward”
with
diplomacy.
The Obama administration’s insistence on diplomatic overtures is just one of
many failures perpetuated by American
foreign policy over the past 30 years,
argues Elan
Journo, fellow at the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights. The Iranian
invasion of the U.S. embassy in Tehran on November 4, 1979, “turned out to be
the first act of
war against us by what became the Islamic totalitarian regime
in Iran.
Jimmy Carter’s handling of that crisis was abysmal: Washington was
humiliated publicly as the hostages remained captive for more than a year, and
then it caved. The next Iranian attack (in Lebanon) was lethal--and the next
one after that, even more so.
“There followed a spiral of aggression--some attacks funded and directed by
Iran, some carried out by Islamist groups inspired by its advances. Ronald
Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton all failed to connect the dots to
see in the attacks a distinct enemy pursing an ideologically driven war: the
Islamic totalitarian movement. None took the steps necessary to defeat it.
“Last summer Iranian protesters bravely challenged their government’s
legitimacy--and
Obama spurned
them, including those among them who truly seek freedom. The protestors
returned this week--and again Obama refused to
support them. Washington is
betraying U.S. interests by seeking to appease the theocrats in Teheran. This
policy ensures the continuation and strengthening of the anti-American Islamist
regime.”
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
OPINION:Why Doesn't Obama Support Iran's Quest for Freedom?
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
No More Articles from these "experts"!
OK, so what are these guys supposed to be experts of? Certainly not objectivity. Nor philosophy. When did the Ayn Rand Institute become such tools for politics ?
Why is 30 years the lens for this article? Because prior to that US and US business supported bad regime after bad regime to get away with exploiting the resources of Iran, in effect fueling the youth resistance movement (not 'Iran') that took the embassy hostage .
Carter did try to rescue these hostages. The mission failed for material reasons, and Iran responded by separating all the hostages. If anything, the release of the hostages was actually delayed by us, possibly for partisan politics.
You can't provide for democracy just by bombing the crap out of a place. This bombast is only going to breed more terrorism .
- Submariner November 6, 2009 3:28PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.