BALTIMORE, MD -- Most of the members of the Baltimore (Md.) City Council are promoting a measure that would require
pregnancy help centers to post a sign saying they do not provide abortions or contraceptives.
Pro-lifers, including Baltimore's Roman Catholic archbishop, say the bill (ordinance 09-0406) is a form of harassment.
Stephanie Rawlings-Burke, the city council president, and 10 other council members are sponsors of legislation that would fine any pregnancy center that does not post the sign, which must be in English and Spanish. Including the president, the council has 15 members. Rawlings-Burke said she proposed the bill after receiving complaints about the centers. The Baltimore City Health Department backs the bill.
Archbishop Edwin O'Brien told Rawlings-Burke in an Oct. 16 letter the proposal discriminates against
pro-life centers.
"The bill does not on the other hand seek to fine
abortion clinics for not posting a list of services they do not provide (e.g.,
parenting classes, maternity and infant clothes, formula)," he wrote.
The measure is similar to one supported by Planned Parenthood last year in the Maryland legislature, The Catholic Review reported. Planned Parenthood, which is the country's No. 1 abortion provider, also is promoting the Baltimore bill, said Nancy Paltell of the Maryland Catholic Conference's respect life office.
"We are providing community services that the city doesn't provide and now they're going to harass us for it," Paltell said, according to the newspaper. "We're saving the city
money, but does the city give one dime to these pregnancy centers? No."
Carol Clews, director of the city's Center for Pregnancy Concerns, also opposes the bill.
"We are very up front and very clear about what we provide for these
women and what we don't provide. They are impugning our integrity. It's frivolous and it's harassment," Clews told WBAL-TV.
O'Brien, the archbishop, told the TV station, "I've never heard of a private institution or a public business being asked to advertise what they don't do under the penalty of a fine.... If we're really looking to protect people in this whole field, I'd say, 'Let's start with the abortion factories."
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
OPINION:Pro-Lifers--Baltimore City Council Targets Pregnancy Centers
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Sounds like a good law that makes sense.
It's really no different than a restaurant with a no smoking sign on the door.
Nonsmokers know they're in the right place. Smokers know they are not and need not waste time sitting down to look at a menu. And of course, restaurant owners who are "very up front and very clear about what they provide" have no qualms about posting their policies.... well.... "up front" so to speak.
- Don Earl
November 5, 2009 11:09PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
harrasment?
Hardly sounds like harassment to me... it sounds like a good way to avoid confusion.
- MrBook
November 6, 2009 5:42AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Well, that sounds like good sense to me.
A " pregnancy help center" should provide help for pregnant women . If that center is actually an adoption referral center, they should advertise themselves as such.
- hap
November 8, 2009 2:54AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.