Obama Must Show Leadership, Pull Out of Afghanistan

By The Cato Institute , Individual Liberty, Free Markets, Peace - October 05, 2009

Icoemail3
Comments(1) | (0)
by Malou Innocent

At a recent town hall meeting, [via Ryan Jaroncyk at The Humble Libertarian], U.S. Rep. Tim Johnson (R-IL) explained why he wants a withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan:

I’m suggesting to you that there is no end game. I believe that our men and women are there in a mission that is ill-defined… I think we’re losing people by the day, here and over there, with no even indirect relationship to our national security.

Within a couple of weeks, I’m going to be looking at legislation and issuing a definitive statement on my position on Afghanistan, which at this point I would suggest would call for our withdrawal of troops forthwith.

We’ve had a succession from Vietnam to Iraq to Afghanistan, and the net result has been thousands of lives lost, and very little progress made… I’m in favor of doing everything we can to make America secure, to make sure we don’t have another 9/11 or even anything analogous to that, but I’m also convinced that our continued presence in Afghanistan is not serving that role. And we need to seriously re-examine where we’re at.

As I mentioned back in February of this year, “There is immense pressure to infuse greater troops in the region, but there is no objective in mind — and before you deploy the troops, you want to have a strategy.” The Obama administration is still stuck at a crossroads: either send more troops to protect the villages of Afghanistan from the Taliban, or stay at present levels (or decrease U.S. troop commitments) to go after al Qaeda cells in Pakistan.

The American public is against sending more troops, the overwhelming majority of Democrats are against sending more troops, some Republicans in Congress have begun to speak out against sending more troops, and prominent conservative commentators are against sending more troops. I am reminded of a quote from General Fred Weyand, the last U.S. commander in Vietnam, who told Pulitzer prize-winning author and Vietnam correspondent Stanley Karnow, “The American army is really a people’s army in the sense that it belongs to the American people… When the army is committed, the American people are committed; when the American people lose their commitment, it is futile to try to keep the army committed.”

I used to ridicule President Bush for staying the course in Iraq. While President Obama will take a hit to his credibility for deciding to scale down America’s presence — after having already deployed more troops earlier this year — I would commend the President for having the strength of his convictions for deciding not to send more young men and women to fight and die for a cause (and a country) that does not constitute a vital national security interest. Doubling down in Afghanistan is too easy. It’s deciding to pull ourselves out of Afghanistan that will take true leadership.

This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


Regarding Article
OPINION:Obama Must Show Leadership, Pull Out of Afghanistan

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • SolarSanitizer
    The problem, though...

    Is Obama's oft-repeated mandate:

    "This is not a war of choice; This is a war of necessity."

    He has described it in no uncertain terms. "Those who attacked America on 9-11 are plotting to do so again. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al-Qaida would plot to kill more Americans . So this is not only a war worth fighting. This is fundamental to the defense of our people."

    The man Obama specially chose to lead the war, Gen. McChrystal, in a report to Defense Secretary Robert Gates, recommended a course that seems certain to require a substantial number of additional troops.

    This was a month ago.

    Obama has taken his eye off the ball while dropping the Olympics torch. Obama cannot go back on his mandate, not with the leader of the forces on the ground advising him to increase American forces on the ground.

    Looks like Obama talked himself into a corner. Will he fail to meet this stated goal also?

    Obama's record of breaking promises, however, will likely mean he'll break this one also.

    - SolarSanitizerUS October 5, 2009 11:42AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...