WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Reports that Congressman Brad Ellsworth (D-IN) is proposing a so-called
abortion funding "compromise" in order to draw
pro-life Democrats to
support the
health care bill should not mislead the American people, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said today.
Perkins who spoke at today's "House Call" rally noted that the latest draft of the "Affordable Health Care for America Act" would authorize federal funding for elective
abortion. Perkins made the following comments:
"We are very disappointed that someone who claims to support the protection of unborn
children would offer language designed to ensure the
government pays for elective abortions behind smoke and mirrors. However cleverly worded the proposal might be, Rep. Ellsworth's plan would authorize a government run
public option to fund elective abortion and subsidize private plans that cover elective abortion.
"The Ellsworth language creates a ruse by appearing to offer a restriction on the use of 'federal funds' for abortion, while leaving in place the key
legal authority which says 'nothing in the Act' should be interpreted to 'prevent the public
health insurance option from providing for ....coverage of' elective abortion.'
"This abortion funding sham is exacerbated by additional language that requires the public option to hire contractors to ensure that
money paid into the government option will be used to
pay for elective abortions. Medicare contracts with private business to handle claims, but no one in their right mind would say Medicare payments are 'private' payments. Ellsworth's language is a hoax intended to mislead pro-lifers, and still requires that federal funds pay for all elective abortions.
"Apparently, Rep. Ellsworth has been co-opted by his pro-abortion colleagues who would rather see the health care bill fail if it doesn't fund abortion, rather than see it pass without abortion funding. We strongly urge Members to keep the status quo on abortion funding by supporting Congressman Bart Stupak's (D-MI) amendment to keep abortion out of the health care legislation. FRC Action will score against any
vote for the Rule if Speaker Pelosi does not allow an up-or-down vote on the Stupak amendment."
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
OPINION:New Abortion Funding "Compromise" is a "Sham"
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Abortion is a medical procedure, is it not?
Why is this even a topic?
If we have a public health system who the hell else is going to do an abortion ?
What constitutes an "elective" abortion compared to any other abortion?
- Submariner November 5, 2009 5:05PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.