Opposing Views: OPINION:Miss. Abstinence Evangelicals Not Familiar With 1st Amendment
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose.
See our privacy policy.
Texas isn’t the only state that is constitutionally challenged. In fact,
Mississippi is giving us a run for our money when it comes to (willful?)
ignorance about what the First Amendment means.
Earlier this summer, our friends at Advocates for Youth
brought us the disturbing tale of an abstinence-only rally/evangelical prayer
meeting sponsored by the state of Mississippi:
In May, the state of Mississippi threw a state-funded abstinence-only rally
for students where they were told the value of not having sex until marriage
(including a chant that went “Stop! Don’t touch me there! This is my no-no
square!”). That in itself is legal, but not when the rally itself is from start
to finish a blatant attempt at proselytizing students in Christianity.
The ACLU just brought forth a lawsuit against the state of Mississippi last
week for violating the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from
promoting one religion over another.
(You can read about the rally — and watch video clips — here. Suffice it to say, this rally didn’t simply brush up
against the church-state boundary. It trampled right over it.)
Now Mississippi Senior
Pastor Lt. Governor Phil Bryant weighs in with local news reporter on the
lawsuit, but apparently under the impression that he was really speaking to a
Sunday school class at his church:
“I was so disappointed that the ACLU has decided that we don’t need to tell
young women in the state of Mississippi about our faith; we don’t need to
explain to them that abstinence, we believe, is related to our faithful
Christianity beliefs.”
(Pause to let that sink in — or to weep quietly.) Let’s count the problems
with this statement:
Government telling young people “about our faith” and “faithful Christianity
beliefs” is a little something the Founders liked to call “establishment of
religion.” And they weren’t too fond of the idea of government telling citizens
what to believe.
Did you notice that the lieutenant governor believes it’s only the “young
women in the state of Mississippi” who need to be educated? Sadly, this “boys
will be boys” attitude is not uncommon in abstinence-only programs (as TFN revealed in our report earlier this year), and it has
the effect of unfairly burdening young women with responsibility for controlling
the behavior of males.
One more time for the record: the ACLU didn’t decide that government can’t
establish a religion or coerce belief. The Constitution settles that issue!
Watch the video for yourself. And if you are so inclined, say a little prayer
for the young people of Mississippi who live in the state with the highest teen birth rate in the nation (ever
higher than in Texas!), but have leaders who think the best thing the government
can do is preach to students.
This content is inappropriate
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content,
so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't
appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
Regarding Article
OPINION:Miss. Abstinence Evangelicals Not Familiar With 1st Amendment
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
My apologies, in my initial post I called Mr. Bryant a few choice names. My post was deleted (as should be).
To summarize: this story really got to me and is just another example of why I've come to despise all religions. No matter how well meaning they start out, after a few generations its all about power and control of the few over the many. And usually, men are deemed superior to women and exempt from the "rules" being held up as "salvation" requirements.
BLEH!
I am SO sick of arrogance and misogyny hiding behind the cloak of religion (and I don't care which "religion", they're all part of the problem)
Truly a repugnant individual. He is free to believe as he wishes, but to use his position to push his religious beliefs on the public is a true violation of the public trust.
I once again have to ask if his supporters would be so supportive if he had used Muslim or Hindi prayers?
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
OPINION:Miss. Abstinence Evangelicals Not Familiar With 1st Amendment
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Oy vey
What a crock of...well, you know.
I wish the ACLU good hunting on this one.
And, for the record? Chanting "Stop! Don’t touch me there! This is my no-no square!”????? That's their answer to sex education ????????? Puh-leeeeeze!
- Babaroni
September 18, 2009 2:20PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
...hold up AS.....
typing too fast....oops
- JBarnett
September 18, 2009 2:51PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
My Bad
My apologies, in my initial post I called Mr. Bryant a few choice names. My post was deleted (as should be).
To summarize: this story really got to me and is just another example of why I've come to despise all religions. No matter how well meaning they start out, after a few generations its all about power and control of the few over the many. And usually, men are deemed superior to women and exempt from the "rules" being held up as "salvation" requirements.
BLEH!
I am SO sick of arrogance and misogyny hiding behind the cloak of religion (and I don't care which "religion", they're all part of the problem)
Ok, better....rant without rancor (mostly)
:)
- JBarnett
September 18, 2009 6:56PM
Reply to this Recommend (1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
repugnant
Truly a repugnant individual. He is free to believe as he wishes, but to use his position to push his religious beliefs on the public is a true violation of the public trust.
I once again have to ask if his supporters would be so supportive if he had used Muslim or Hindi prayers?
- MrBook
September 19, 2009 7:57AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.