Opposing Views: OPINION:Insider Trading is Illegal -- Unless You're a Congressman
Email addresses will be used to email the information on your behalf and will not be collected, shared, sold, or used by Opposing Views for any other purpose.
See our privacy policy.
Everybody knows that insider trading is illegal. Wall Street big wigs who get caught giving their cronies valuable information before it’s made public go to jail. Yet, those same rules don’t apply in the halls of Congress where members, their staffs and other federal officials can use the inside information they gather about upcoming legislation for their own financial gain.
Studies show that Congressional insiders do far better with their stock trades than you and I. A 2004 study found that investment returns for senators were 25 percent higher than for average investors. Alan Ziobrowski, a business professor at Georgia State University, analyzed more than 6000 stock transactions by members of Congress over a six year period and found that members outperformed the market by 1 percent a month and 12 percent a year, which Ziobrowski said was “way outside any random variation.” He and Craig Holman, Public Citizen’s expert on ethics and lobbying, talked about the issue on CNBC’s Street Talk and NPR’s Marketplace.
It’s not just the members of Congress and their staffs that are benefiting from insider information, either. From the NPR story:
The value of information that flows from the inner workings of Washington isn’t lost on Wall Street professionals.
Michael Bagley is a former congressional staffer who now runs the OSINT Group. Bagley sells access and research. His clients are hedge funds, and he makes it his business to mine Congress and the rest of Washington for tips.
All of this is why Holman says it’s important that Congress pass the “Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act” (H.R. 682), which would make government officials abide by the same insider trading restrictions that everyone else faces. As the federal government increases its role in managing and regulating financial institutions, the need for this law becomes even more imperative, Holman said.
This content is inappropriate
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content,
so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't
appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
Regarding Article
OPINION:Insider Trading is Illegal -- Unless You're a Congressman
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
While it's easy to toss this case up to corruption, I'm not sure that's the case. As Senators and Congressman they are privy to a lot of information. If they got information as a result of their job, either in Congressional investigations or from lobbyists , might they act on the information? I'd suspect so. It would be hard for me to be getting information from a lobbyist (unsolicited about a company, realize I own stock in it, and NOT act on it out of principle.
Probably does need some reform, I'd have to read the act to see what we are talking about - I just don't think it's blatant corruption like when Wall Street does it because (in most cases) the information isn't likely solicited by the Congressman.
How do we know what a Congressman and his lobbyist discuss? It is not public record. With what reasonable information do rely on to make your assertion?
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
OPINION:Insider Trading is Illegal -- Unless You're a Congressman
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Corruption ? Not Sure.
While it's easy to toss this case up to corruption, I'm not sure that's the case. As Senators and Congressman they are privy to a lot of information. If they got information as a result of their job, either in Congressional investigations or from lobbyists , might they act on the information? I'd suspect so. It would be hard for me to be getting information from a lobbyist (unsolicited about a company, realize I own stock in it, and NOT act on it out of principle.
Probably does need some reform, I'd have to read the act to see what we are talking about - I just don't think it's blatant corruption like when Wall Street does it because (in most cases) the information isn't likely solicited by the Congressman.
- caelum
September 22, 2009 11:17AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
How can we possibly know?
How do we know what a Congressman and his lobbyist discuss? It is not public record. With what reasonable information do rely on to make your assertion?
- SolarSanitizer
September 22, 2009 8:56PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.