The Day of Silence is coming — April 17 to be exact — and some conservative groups are already
calling for students to walkout of school on that day."From the Illinois Family Institute: "A national coalition of pro-family organizations is urging parents to call their children out of school on April 17. This is the day designated for this year’s Day of Silence when students and/or teachers will purposely remain silent during instructional time to protest so-called discrimination and gain sympathy for students who identify as homosexual or transgender."
The Day of Silence is a yearly event sponsored by the partisan political action group, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). The implicit purpose is to undermine the belief that homosexuality is immoral. It is the belief of the sponsors of the Walkout that parents should no longer passively accept the political usurpation of taxpayer funded public school classrooms through student silence."
The walkout is a new wrinkle. Last year, these same groups called for parents to keep the kids home. It sounds like the plan this year is to allow students to go to school and then tell them to walk out.
The article contradicts itself on at least one point. First, it reads:
"
The DOS requires that teachers either create activities around or exempt silent students from any activity that involves speaking. DOS participants have a captive audience, many of whom disagree with and are made uncomfortable by the politicization of their classroom."
And then a little later, says:
"Higgins further emphasizes that 'The worthy end of eliminating harassment does not justify the means of exploiting instructional time.' The First Amendment already allows DOS participants to wear t-shirts or put up posters, but
according to a document co-written by the ACLU and Lambda Legal, a “school can regulate what students say. . . and it can also insist that students respond to questions, make presentations, etc.” Students and teachers should not be allowed to exploit instructional time to advance their socio-political goals."
Note the two sentences in bold print. The release first says the Day of Silence requires that teachers exempt students from speaking and then admits that the DOS does not mandate such exemption. As noted in the release on my personal
blog last year, DOS materials make this clear. In any event, it seems to me that a walkout will be more disruptive than silence in the hallways.
I will again favor the
Golden Rule Pledge.
Read the original article from the Illinois Family Institute,
"Public School Protest for Gay Rights Dangerously Misguided."POST YOUR COMMENTS BELOW
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
OPINION: Illinois Family Institute Hates the Sin, Avoids the Sinner
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
"Ex-Gay" Ministry Leader
The responses to this year's Day of Silence will be mixed. Clearly, emotions have been stirred on both sides of the gay-rights debate because of the current socio-political climate. Proposition 8 arguments begin tomorrow in the California Supreme Court. A years-long, landmark lesbian civil union child custody/visitation court battle pitting Vermont against Virginia is heating up anew. A strongly pro-gay nominee for the Department of Health and Human Services is about to go before Congress for what should be a contentious confirmation process.
In this climate, it's not hard to see why many parents with conservative or Christian beliefs feel the need to make a statement. They feel gay-rights advocates (and GLSEN is an organization with ulterior motives) are undermining all that is sacred to them. Schools are not political playgrounds. And students who are struggling with unwanted same-sex attraction or who have renounced homosexuality feel like outcasts, too. How do we support them?
The Golden Rule Pledge may be one way of avoiding messy protests. But protest doesn't have to be messy. Frankly, I don't think most students today have the spiritual frame of reference to even understand the Golden Rule. Those advocating this pledge believe they are being Jesus Christ's ambassadors. I hope they are received that way. This situation may be calling for more of a righteously angry Jesus-in-the-Temple approach, however. Veritas odium parit. It's one thing to stand for safe treatment of all students. It's another to remain silent in the face of political bullying.
How about a Truth Pledge?
- Debbie Thurman
March 4, 2009 7:25PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.