Federal funding for
abstinence until
marriage education was stripped from the
budget today in the House subcommittee, led by Rep. David Obey (D-WI). The budget now goes to the full committee and to the full House of Representatives.
Proponents of contraceptive-only
sex education have long awaited the day when they are given free reign over the sexualization of our
children. There is a small minority of very well federally funded groups who try to give the perception that contraceptive-only sex education programs are effective at protecting
teens from the problems related to sexual activity.
Studies of contraceptive-only sex education reveal that there is no evidence that condom programs are effective at decreasing teen pregnancy or STDs.
It was also found that abstinence programs have produced broad-based and sustained increases in the percentage of youth who remain sexually abstinent.
There is evidence that abstinence education is an effective primary prevention strategy. The research does not support abandoning abstinence education in favor of a contraceptive-only sex education strategy that has not been proven to be successful.
Abstinence advocates are calling on President Obama for bipartisan support and to stop politicizing the health of our children.
"We've got news for the condom worshipers," says Leslee Unruh, President of the National Abstinence Clearinghouse, "abstinence education is not going away any time soon. Taxpayers will not tolerate their money being used for ideological latex-only programs and the molestation of their children's minds and future."
The Abstinence Clearinghouse continues to work on the front lines to protect abstinence until marriage, without compromise.
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
OPINION: House Strips Funding for Abstinence Education
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Misleading Language
There is no such thing as "contraceptive-only" sex education . All comprehensive sex ed programs present abstinence as an option. They just supplement it with the information teenagers need if they don't make that choice.
Referring to comprehensive sex ed as "contraceptive-only" misrepresents its purpose, which is to provide teenagers with complete knowledge on sexuality, including both abstinence and the proper use of contraceptives.
- lightandfrothy
July 16, 2009 12:09PM
Reply to this Recommend (1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Condom Worshipers?
What kind of name is that? So now we bow down to condoms ? C'mon , just because some kids get the rings and the cards, and say they're going to be abstinent doesn't mean 100% that they are! Friends I know who were already sexually active just got those things for the the fun of it! Teachers teach abstinence ALONG with condoms and contraceptive because it's more efficient saying " Hey , don't have sex until you're ready, but if you do at least protect yourself." We want what's best for the teen not " I hope " he/she won't do it.
- Daeva
July 22, 2009 11:41PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
effectiveness?
Hasn't Abstinence-Only sex education been shown to be ineffective? Some studies have shown that Texas has an exceptionally high rate of STD's and teen pregnancy ... an interesting turn for a state seeped in AO sex ed.
A comprehensive sex ed program does need lessons on abstinence , but it also needs lessons on safe sexual activity (birth control and STD prevention).
And abstinence until marriage ? That's a laugh!
- MrBook
July 23, 2009 6:37AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.