GAO Issues Misleading Report on Mexico Violence and U.S. Guns

By National Shooting Sports Foundation , Always Shooting for More - June 21, 2009

Icoemail3
Comments(2) | (0)
By Ted Novin

The General Accounting Office (GAO) of the United States has released a study on firearms trafficking and violence in Mexico.

The report, which NSSF is still reviewing, appears to be rife with error. Consider the following claim: “According to U.S. and Mexican government officials, these firearms have been increasingly more powerful and lethal in recent years. For example, many of these firearms are high-caliber and high-powered, such as AK and AR-15 type semiautomatic rifles.”

These rifles, of course, are no more “powerful” or “lethal” than any other lawful rifle, and they fire ammunition that is considerably less powerful than other hunting rifles.

The report has also led to a revival of false allegations regarding recovered firearms in Mexico. As the trade association for the firearms industry, we believe it is important to set the record straight (and separate fact from fiction):

Some 29,000 firearms were recovered in Mexico last year, of which approximately 5,000 were traced to U.S. sources. That means more than 80 percent of the firearms recovered in Mexico were not traced to the United States. Furthermore, according to the ATF, those firearms traced were originally sold at retail not recently, but on average 14 years earlier. This is completely inconsistent with any notion that a flood of newly purchased firearms are being illegally smuggled over the border into Mexico. And let's not forget, no retail firearms sale can be made in the U.S. until after a criminal background check on the purchaser has been completed.

In recent years as many as 150,000 Mexican soldiers, 17,000 last year alone, defected to go work for the drug cartels -- bringing their American-made service-issued firearms with them. It has also been well documented that the drug cartels are illegally smuggling fully automatic firearms, grenades and other weapons into Mexico from South and Central America. Such items are not being purchased at retail firearms stores in the United States.

Although it’s understandable that Mexican authorities and sympathetic American agencies are frustrated with cartel-related violence, it is wrong for anyone to blame the Second Amendment and America’s firearms industry for those problems.

Members of the firearms industry take seriously the criminal acquisition and misuse of their products. This is why our industry supports the Southwest Border Violence Reduction Act of 2009, sponsored by Sen. Bingaman (D-NM), and will continue to work cooperatively with law enforcement. For nearly a decade, our industry has partnered with the ATF in a national campaign called Don’t Lie for the Other Guy that makes the public aware that it is a serious crime to illegally straw purchase a firearm. The program also helps ATF to educate firearms retailers to be better able to detect and prevent illegal straw purchases. Senior executives from NSSF will be continuing the acclaimed Don’t Lie campaign next week in both the Rio Grande Valley (Texas) and Houston (Texas).

Going through the full GAO report will take some time, but no one should be under any illusions; from what we’ve read so far, facts take a backseat to unfounded allegations and hyperbole.

Read the Opposing Views debate, Are U.S. Guns to Blame for Violence in Mexico?
This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


Regarding Article
OPINION: GAO Issues Misleading Report on Mexico Violence and U.S. Guns

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • mhphoto
    Why doesn't the NYTs print this?

    This will never make it on any of the big news channels' shows, and false statistics will still be used to try and deny and limit our rights.

    It's a sad situation.

    But, I've been thinking recently, or rather, over the past ten minutes.

    You see, ten minutes ago I watched an Iranian woman named Neda die. I watched her die. Someone on a rooftop shot her in the heart, while she was doing nothing but attending a protest against a tyrannical government. I searched for articles pertaining to Iran's gun laws but I couldn't find any. I can only assume they're very strict on non- military citizens.

    People say that we don't need guns to protect us. They say that the police will save us. The State will save us. But look at what's happening over there to those brave people. They're going up against an army of people working under a corrupt regime who are killing their own citizens for questioning their government. Those people need to be able to fight back. They need to be able to exercise their God-given right to defend their lives. They need to have that right, but they don't. Why? Because the State denies them the right.

    Even people who don't own guns should appreciate the rights we have that were put in place to allow us to be ready for the unlikely, albeit serious threat of a tyrannical government. People say it can't happen here, but how many times has it happened around the world since we drafted the Constitution?

    Stop trying to take away our rights.

    - mhphotoUS June 21, 2009 11:07PM

    Reply to this Recommend (4) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • LagerHead
      So true

      It's laughable that outlets like the NYT continue to call their papers journalism. While every fact and statistic that points to their left wing agenda is printed in big, bold letters, anything refuting those "facts" is completely ignored. The misleading statistics on Mexico's guns is a prime example. And now that a similar report has been issued about Jamaica's guns, I am skeptical to say the least.
      It's time that Americans start holding these papers accountable for their one-sided journalism and stop buying them. Maybe then they will change. And if not, they will go the way of the dodo.

      - LagerHeadUS June 22, 2009 9:28AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...