An Atheist public policy organization today called for elimination of requirements in
Senate legislation which would reimburse faith-based "healers" for their services.
The Senate Finance Committee has taken up the America's Healthy Future Act of 2009 which has an amendment titled "Religious Non-discrimination in Healthcare. The provision bans insurance companies from denying patients "benefits for religious or spiritual
healthcare. Similar legislation, the Affordable Health Choices Act, has already cleared the U.S. Senate, and has a similar provision.
Dr. Ed Buckner, President of American Atheists, warned that the measure amounts to a public subsidy for certain religious groups.
"Any adult in the legislative or executive branch of the federal government, or of any state government, who wants to use unproven, unscientific 'remedies' should be free to do so," said Buckner. "But support for such irrational nonsense violates the separation of
religion and government and the canons of good sense. Including faith-healing or other non-medical 'treatment' in
health care legislation must be rejected."
Dave Silverman, Communications Director for American Atheists, said that Christian Science and other faith-based healers already receive public
money, and that the policy is not based on good
science.
"We need to spend that money on providing solid, fact-based
medicine. Reimbursing the faith-healing industry wastes precious resources, and violates the separation of
church and state."
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
OPINION: 'Faith Healing' Does Not Belong in Our Health Care Bills
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Great
Let's just waste money to spend on treatments that don't work and are sometimes even dangerous. No insurance company or the government should have to cover treatments that are unscientific and don't work.
Can anyone seriously justify this on any grounds besides religious fundamentalism? I'm just curious. It's bad scientifically, it's bad fiscally, and it's bad logically. What possible reason could their be besides some mega-pastor wants to get reimbursed by an insurance company for saying "may god heal you" over a sick person?
Our Senate is full of morons.
- caelum
October 5, 2009 9:49AM
Reply to this Recommend (1)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Our Senate is full of morons.
Finally.
Something we can agree on without reservations.
It should be little surprise that the Senate has maintained lower approval rates that were ever recorded for G.W. Bush
- SolarSanitizer
October 5, 2009 10:35AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.