Do Marijuana Arrests Really Accomplish Anything?
By Reason Foundation
, Free Minds and Free Markets
-
November 05, 2009
In the January 2008 issue of Reason, I compared trends in marijuana arrests to trends in marijuana use and concluded that "there is no clear relationship between the number of arrests and the number of pot smokers." That is, it did not seem to be the case that a) increases in use were driving up arrests or b) increases in arrests were driving down use. In the November issue of The Bulletin of Cannabis Reform, Jon Gettman takes a more detailed and sophisticated look at the numbers and reaches much the same conclusion:
The most important characteristic of marijuana arrests in the United States is that they have been steadily increasing over the last 20 years with little or no impact on the level of marijuana use in this country....Marijuana arrests have nearly doubled from 1991 to 2008, increasing by 150% during the 1990s and increasing steadily in recent years, producing an annualized change of 6.56% per year during this period. Overall, levels of marijuana use in the United States have remained fundamentally unchanged during this period.
The implication is that the risk of arrest has gone up. By my calculation, comparing annual arrests to annual users, it has roughly doubled. But Gettman argues that "the overall marijuana arrest rate of between 3% and 6% of users is not enough to represent a meaningful deterrent." He also notes that the risk is not evenly distributed:
While the marijuana-use rate for African-Americans is only about 25% greater than for whites, the marijuana possession arrest rate for blacks is three times greater. This is not a regional disparity, but is seen in every state and most counties.
Looking across jurisdictions, Getmann finds little evidence that relatively lenient treatment of pot smokers is associated with higher levels of use or that relatively harsh treatment is associated will lower levels of use. He estimates that "marijuana arrests cost state and local governments $10.3 billion in 2006."
The whole report is here (PDF). And in case that does not satisfy your appetite for marijuana arrest numbers, the Marijuana Policy Almanac, which includes "state rankings and individual reports for all 50 states plus the District of Columbia," is here.
I considered the latest marijuana arrest figures in September.
--------------------------------
See a state-by-state list of the effects of marijuana legislation.
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
OPINION:Do Marijuana Arrests Really Accomplish Anything?
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Money machine
When you consider that in most states,a bond is required before release,depending on the states laws. And the attorneys fees must be quite a sum. Then there is court costs,fines and maybe probation fees.
A DUI in Texas will cost you approximately $1500 in court costs and a misdemeanor marijuana arrest will cost you about a $1000,if you don't have more than a small quantity .
When you multiply the number of arrests by 1000,the sum becomes very large and has to be considered as a reason for the police fighting legalization .
When you add in the search and seizure monies,it really makes you sick.
- Clay
November 5, 2009 7:14PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Indeed
That is a part of it. You forgot to mention the probation and classes. How much does it cost the tax payers to keep them in a jail for weeks or months before and after trial?
It would probably be more profitable to catch a murderer or another sort of felony offense. If there is a way to catch someone for DUI of marijuana other than a urine test(stays in your system for 20-40 days) then it should be treated the same as alcohol .
Weed is not a drug.
One Love!
- ttut21
November 6, 2009 11:18AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Of course
How else can you wage war on your own people, literally as well as figuratively?
- Submariner November 6, 2009 1:20PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.