Atheists Concerned Over UN Defamation of Religions Resolution

By American Atheists , An Educational Organization for Atheists - November 03, 2009

Icoemail3
Comments(4) | (1)
An Atheist civil rights group today expressed concern that a proposed U.N. Resolution banning "defamation" of religion threatens civil liberties and gives religious groups "special rights" at the expense of free speech and intellectual inquiry.

The proposed measure is backed by the Organization of the Islamic Conference, and encourages member states of the UN to enforce measures prohibiting "any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence."

Dr. Ed Buckner, President of American Atheists described the proposal as "overly broad and a clear threat to anyone who questions religion or is critical of religion."

"Publications and books that raise doubts concerning God and religion could easily be censored, along with movies, art and theater if a believer is 'offended' by the content," said Buckner. He cited the publication of Salman Rush die's novel "The Satanic Verses" and the more recent cartoons in the Danish press that contained unflattering depictions of Islam and its prophet Mohammed.

"What happens if a Christian is 'offended' by a copy of the Koran, or a Muslim objects to a book by Atheist Richard Dawkins," Buckner continued. "This resolution would result in widespread government surveillance and censorship wherever opinions about religion are expressed."

Edwin Kagin, National Legal Director for American Atheists, said that the proposed measure "could result in a collision between the UN and the Bill of Rights."

"This proposal creates 'special rights' for organized religion at the expense of the First Amendment," Kagin added. "It immunizes religion from any criticism or questioning. That is something our country was established to prevent."

The measure is expected to reach the floor of the UN General Assembly later this month. The U.S. Department of State has already spoken out against the proposal, as have a number of European governments.
This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


Regarding Article
OPINION:Atheists Concerned Over UN Defamation of Religions Resolution

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Submariner
    "Equal" Protection

    If anything the UN should be moving to protect people FROM each others religions.

    Not too many athiest suicide bombings or witch burnings, ya see.

    - Submariner November 3, 2009 4:09PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • dogon
    Tribalism

    The good fight to move civilization forward has gone on now for several hundred years commencing with the Renaissance in spite of religion and its dogmas continuous attempts to restrain the advance and hold on to it's waining power base.

    If this change , that defies reason, comes into effect it will over time consign the states that put the motion forward, and enforce it, to their rightful place in history as their in influence in the world of reasoning states and countries diminishes leaving them a small backwater block of tribalism.

    America is already on this path to a degree. Just examine the results of American young people in comparison to western Europe or China.....America is way down the list ...concentrating on creationism as opposed to the realism of evolution ....god is getting in the way of American greatness.

    Evolution works as well in politics as it does in the natural world.

    - dogonCA November 3, 2009 4:30PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • bug
    shades of theocracy

    Just another attempt for religions to squelch any intellectual curiosity or philisophical debate about the origins and meaning of life. Only blind faith and unquestioning obedience to any unseen god and religious dogma. This proposal is too vague and too broadbased to not be open for abusive suppression of an individual's right to free-thought and free speech .

    - bugUS November 3, 2009 4:37PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • mobragauk
    The Limits of Tolerance

    One thing is to tolerate religion and to respect that some individual decides to believe in whatever he or she wishes. Another thing is to tolerate their susceptibilities and tantrums. I thinks it is time Humanity starts growing up.

    - mobragaukGB November 5, 2009 11:08AM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...