Animal Research Saves Human and Animal Lives

November 25, 2008

Icoemail3
Comments(1) | (0)
By Americans for Medical Progress

As you will see in the list below, advances in research for human conditions often lead to applications for animals.

Benefits of Animal Research to Humans:
* Antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial infections
* Vaccines for smallpox, tetanus, diphtheria, polio, rubella, measles, lyme disease, hepatitis A + B, chicken pox, pneumonia, and flu.
* Insulin to control type 1 diabetes and islet transplantations to cure it.
* Anti-coagulants, anesthesia, and neuromuscular blocking agents.
* Targeted therapies for cancer patients.
* Pacemaker implants to treat cardiac patients.
* Medicines to control the progression of HIV/AIDS.
* Use of antiviral medicines to prevent HIV transmission from mother to child.
* Advances in cardiology, including open heart surgery, coronary bypass techniques and high blood pressure medication.
* Development of stem cell research techniques.
* Corneal transplantation.
* Organ transplant techniques and anti-rejection drugs.
* Medicines to reverse bone loss in osteoporosis.

Benefits of Animal Research to Animals
Medicines originally developed for humans are now used to treat pets, farm animals and wildlife, including anesthetics, tranquilizers, and pain killers.

* Ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and CAT scans to diagnose tumors and other conditions.
* Cataract surgery for blindness.
* Cardiac pacemakers.
* Immunization against distemper, rabies, parvovirus, infectious hepatitis, anthrax, and tetanus.
* Vaccine for feline leukemia.
* Skin grafts for wounds.
* Medicines to treat illnesses such as diabetes, heart failure and epilepsy in pets.
* The use of in vitro fertilization procedures to preserve endangered species.
* Laser surgical repair of congenital abnormalities and traumatic injuries.
* Treatment for parasites.
* Arthroscopic surgery.
* Radiation and immunotherapy for cancer.
                                
                                       And the list goes on and on....




POST YOUR COMMENT BELOW
This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


Regarding Article
OPINION: Animal Research Saves Human and Animal Lives

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Word Star
    Simpler Argument

    Many prominent scientists, supported by a vast amount of research, doubt the value of animal testing. An article in the Guardian cited geneticist and director of Europeans for Medical Progress Kathy Archibald saying researchers are "trying to create the impression that there is unanimous support in the scientific community, and that is not the case. There is enormous doubt about the testing."

    Many of the alleged advances in medical science using animal testing were failures and ended up being harmful to humans and are either withdrawn or relabeled due to severe, unpredicted side effects. Drug after drug is being exposed as harmful to patients even though they were not harmful to animals. Vioxx was tested extensively on monkeys and proven to be beneficial to monkey hearts, but this mistake will cost Merck & Co. $4.85 billion dollars to settle 26,600 Vioxx-related personal-injury lawsuits. Vioxx is just one example,of many.

    In fact, in a USDA press release January 12, 2006, Health & Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt said:

    "Currently, nine out of ten experimental drugs fail in clinical studies because we cannot accurately predict how they will behave in people based on laboratory and animal studies."

    But there is a simpler argument that testing is either morally or scientifically dubious: The animals must be a great deal like us for the results to be scientifically unproblematic, but very different from us in order to be morally unproblematic. When we want scientifically useful results, the more like us they are, the better. When we want clear consciences over causing disease, suffering, and death to innocent creatures, the more like us the animals are, the worse.

    We cannot have it both ways?



    - Word StarUS November 26, 2008 5:41PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...