AMA Ends 72-Year Policy, Says Marijuana has Medical Benefits

By Americans for Safe Access , Medical Marijuana Therapeutics/Research - November 10, 2009

Icoemail3
Comments(16) | (1)
HOUSTON --- The American Medical Association (AMA) voted today to reverse its long-held position that marijuana be retained as a Schedule I substance with no medical value. The AMA adopted a report drafted by the AMA Council on Science and Public Health (CSAPH) entitled, "Use of Cannabis for Medicinal Purposes," which affirmed the therapeutic benefits of marijuana and called for further research. The CSAPH report concluded that, "short term controlled trials indicate that smoked cannabis reduces neuropathic pain, improves appetite and caloric intake especially in patients with reduced muscle mass, and may relieve spasticity and pain in patients with multiple sclerosis." Furthermore, the report urges that "the Schedule I status of marijuana be reviewed with the goal of facilitating clinical research and development of cannabinoid-based medicines, and alternate delivery methods."

The change of position by the largest physician-based group in the country was precipitated in part by a resolution adopted in June of 2008 by the Medical Student Section (MSS) of the AMA in support of the reclassification of marijuana's status as a Schedule I substance. In the past year, the AMA has considered three resolutions dealing with medical marijuana, which also helped to influence the report and its recommendations. The AMA vote on the report took place in Houston, Texas during the organization's annual Interim Meeting of the House of Delegates. The last AMA position, adopted 8 years ago, called for maintaining marijuana as a Schedule I substance, with no medical value.

"It's been 72 years since the AMA has officially recognized that marijuana has both already-demonstrated and future-promising medical utility," said Sunil Aggarwal, Ph.D., the medical student who spearheaded both the passage of the June 2008 resolution by the MSS and one of the CSAPH report's designated expert reviewers. "The AMA has written an extensive, well-documented, evidence-based report that they are seeking to publish in a peer-reviewed journal that will help to educate the medical community about the scientific basis of botanical cannabis-based medicines." Aggarwal is also on the Medical & Scientific Advisory Board of Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the largest medical marijuana advocacy organization in the U.S.

The AMA's about face on medical marijuana follows an announcement by the Obama Administration in October discouraging U.S. Attorneys from taking enforcement actions in medical marijuana states. In February 2008, a resolution was adopted by the American College of Physicians (ACP), the country's second largest physician group and the largest organization of doctors of internal medicine. The ACP resolution called for an "evidence-based review of marijuana's status as a Schedule I controlled substance to determine whether it should be reclassified to a different schedule. "The two largest physician groups in the U.S. have established medical marijuana as a health care issue that must be addressed," said ASA Government Affairs Director Caren Woodson. "Both organizations have underscored the need for change by placing patients above politics."

Though the CSAPH report has not been officially released to the public, AMA documentation indicates that it: "(1) provides a brief historical perspective on the use of cannabis as medicine; (2) examines the current federal and state-based legal envelope relevant to the medical use of cannabis; (3) provides a brief overview of our current understanding of the pharmacology and physiology of the endocannabinoid system; (4) reviews clinical trials on the relative safety and efficacy of smoked cannabis and botanical-based products; and (5) places this information in perspective with respect to the current drug regulatory framework."

Further information:

Executive Summary of AMA Report
Recommendations of AMA Report
American College of Physicians resolution

--------------------------

Marijuana-Related Databases on Opposing Views

See a state-by-state list of the effects of marijuana legislation.

See a list of marijuana dispensaries in the United States.

This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


Regarding Article
OPINION:AMA Ends 72-Year Policy, Says Marijuana has Medical Benefits

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Brenda Shoop
    big news

    This is big news for those who wish to use cannabis medicinally with the government 's approval.

    - Brenda ShoopUS November 10, 2009 2:52PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • dmunkey
    Optomisim vs. realism

    As optomistic as I am this this is the end of Cannabis prohibition, realistically as the AMA has made sure to make it abundantly clear that they do NOT endorse the legalization of Cannabis. More than likely "the powers that be" will re-classify Cannabis to a Schedual 2 narcotic (like Cocaine, and Opiates), stating that there is "some" medical benefits .
    I personally won't be happy until society realises that consumeing Cannabis via eating or vaporizing is far less harmful than ANY of those o' so large and colorful cans of energy drink, ya know the ones kids have no trouble buying.

    - dmunkeyUS November 10, 2009 3:49PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • Clay
      Ahhhhhh

      Even as a schedule 2 drug,the DEA loses their control over the production of any marijuana for use in clinical tests and they lose the
      role of overseer for any study. Because it is not a schedule 1 drug,they
      no longer will be required to fight legalization ,by any means necessary, as they do now.
      It opens the door for everything we want,and will bring about legalization.

      - ClayUS November 11, 2009 2:04AM

      Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Clay
    Realiistic

    With the DEA out of the loop and not able to stop all medical studies as they have since they started up,all the cancer blocking attributes of marijuana will be more thoroughly tested and either confirmed or debunked. I believe that as in the study from Spain on head and neck
    cancers,marijuana smokers are over 60% less likely to have the cancer in the first place. How many billions of dollars in cancer treatments could we save if it is true? How many lives?
    The researchers admit that they don't know exactly how marijuana blocks cancer,other than some of the canibinoids (not in my spell checker) in marijuana that have shown possible cancer blocking
    possibilities in several other clinical tests. Their study was done using statistics and clinical information from other studies that have found possible cancer blocking properties.
    And this is old news to our government . They have allowed millions to contract cancer if it is true. The University Of Virginia was doing a clinical trial using marijuana to treat cancer and the DEA shut them down,in 1975. One of the studies the researchers in Spain used was the largest clinical study ever done on marijuana and lung function,by
    the National Institute of Drug Abuse,trying to link smoking marijuana
    and cancer using the same methods used when tobacco was linked
    with cancer. After 4 years of study,the researchers found that marijuana did not cause cancer and that it even showed possible cancer treatment and preventive attributes,and said further studies should be done. They never were,because it is illegal for the DEA to allow anyone to do those studies,as long as marijuana is Schedule 1.
    Donald Tashkin was a researcher on that study,and is the head researcher now for UCLA. Search him out and listen to what he says.
    There are videos of interviews with him on youtube. And the complete study is available at the cannabis research library.
    The Spanish study is also there,and 2 or 3 other studies,one on prostate cancer,another on breast cancer ,all known by our government and ignored.

    - ClayUS November 11, 2009 2:40AM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • ldlework
      NONSENSE

      All of this discussion about the benefits of Marijuana is /nonsense/! Let me submit that this subject *should* have nothing to do with the benefits of Marijuana and more like the facts that smoking Marijuana has no -- negative -- effects! What in the Harry Anslinger is our Federal Government, no less, doing spending several billion dollars a year throwing non-violent dope users in prison ?!

      If when the topic of Marijuana comes up around you and the first thing you think of is how it might stop cancer or be used medicinally you need to stop your self, breathe deep, and realize no - the legalization of this plant is a much more serious issue than the loss of its effects. We owe it to the several hundred thousand people who go to jail each year for smoking a *EXCEEDINGLY HARMLESS* plant.

      - ldleworkUS November 11, 2009 8:12AM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • Concerned Parent
    Let's save our kids from the drug dealers

    I’m disgusted by the idea that my taxes are spent arresting marijuana users while violent criminals roam free, and I’m sick of the idea that the criminal drug cartels might try to get my kids involved in drugs just for the money .
    Licensing, taxing, and regulating the distribution of marijuana is the surest way to put the criminal drug dealers out of business and protect our children from the money-hungry criminal element. It’s time to protect our children and take the marijuana business out of the hands of criminals. License, tax, and regulate the marijuana business.
    And while we’re at it, let’s find a way to pull the revenue-hungry public policy in the right direction on personal cultivation (i.e., let’s get past the “you can’t tax it because people will just grow their own” argument). Let’s implement a personal cultivation permit. Limit the size of the growing area or the number of plants, and put a small user-fee on it to cover administrative costs, something like a fishing license. Maybe high enough that there will be a little something left over for education or fixing the roads.
    One possibility:$100 per year for a permit to cultivate a dozen plants.
    It’s a win-win.

    - Concerned ParentUS November 11, 2009 8:51AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • AB390
    Common sense

    Finally some common sense about cannabis from the AMA!

    If you live in California and support an end to prohibition, visit http://yes390.org

    - AB390US November 12, 2009 1:37PM

    Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • speed59
    Oh Goodie

    The only medical benefit it has is to dull the pain of those who REALLY are suffering from an illness, otherwise all we'll have is high, stoned out of their minds people driving /walking around.
    For those who are for it, please let me know when you have smoked it & then plan to go out so I can warn all my loved ones to stay indoors until the all clear!
    (Yes, alcohol is right up there with it but I don't condone drinking & driving either)
    Can't wait for all this to happen and to all you that are druggies or are for it all I can say is;
    HIT ME WITH YOUR BEST SHOT!

    - speed59IE November 16, 2009 11:54AM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • ooonimrodooo
      I hate to break it to you...

      but... honestly, millions of people already smoke marijuana , and I bet you anything that 75% of them are already driving around while high. While I do not condone it, I do believe that it has no where near the judgment altering capabilities as alcohol . It is far less harmful than alcohol and some people can actually focus better when using the drug. So no, alcohol is not "right up there with it" but far above it when it comes to severity.

      - ooonimrodoooUS November 16, 2009 1:26PM

      Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • speed59
        So because already do it

        means it's ok to make it legal ? What kind of reasoning is that? Where are your facts to back up your statement where you believe that it's judgement altering or is less harmful? Are you & society wiling to take the chance on less harmful or someone's judgement is less impaired when it comes to your loved one's health on either the receiving or giving end of a 3000lb auto? (Yeah, talk to the mother in upstate NY who killed her relatives on the highway about it. Oh wait, you can't cause she's dead from smoking weed & drinkiing!)

        Those for legalization are under the impression that it can be controlled like tobacco or alcohol are forgetting one simple fact. One just cannot grow their own tobacco or make their own alcohol unless they want to use a part of their garden (which would only be during growing season) or would want to use their bathtub to make their drinks.
        Point is, one can grow weed (which it really is) almost anywhere. So, where's the control & money from the taxes ? Legalization will only bring a new set of laws for control.
        Of course, people will still complain about how their tax $$s are wasted on arrests & convictions for possession while the system lets more violent criminls go free. Well my response to that is;
        What ever happened to following the rules & right/wrong, good v evil?
        ... Read More
        Fix the system & don't take the easy way out!
        Sorry to offfend but anyone for legalization is either because they smoke it in the closet in secrecy or are neighborhood drug dealers growing it in public lands or in the spare bedroom so their argument for is just lame!

        - speed59IE November 16, 2009 11:45PM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • se7ens
          Actually it's really quite easy

          to make alcohol in your home. In fact, most higher end liquor stores even sell home micro brewing kits for making your own beer. By focusing on this one part of it though, (the smoking while driving bit which should be illegal ) you're missing the larger view of the whole thing which is, this plant seems to be an almost wunderdrug. It has been shown to fight cancer and actually reduce the size of tumors in patients along with a litany of other benefits it has. Besides, you're going to be hard-pressed to convince me of the evilness of any plant.

          - se7ensUS November 17, 2009 10:08AM

          Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • speed59
            Really??

            By reading all your supporting statement(?), it looks as if you can't even convince yourself of the wonderfulness of it. I like how you go on to say "this plant seems to be an almost wunderdrug." ALMOST??!! Are you & society willing to bet your lives on ALMOST??
            Of course one can make their own alcohol , ever heard of bathtub gin? Read a few stories about the Prohibition era in the U.S. & then tell me about high end liquor stores.

            Your whole argument for is all based on supposition & your saying that I'm mssing the larger view? Actutually, I see more of the bigger picture than you or those who are for since human nature is to always find the easy way out & circumnavigate common sense.
            As I said, making it legal will do nothing but generate a few dollars for the gov't & keep the illegal growing in the spare rooms, public parks & gardens. No amount of control will stop this & you'lll end with more laws for control than what's on the books right now! I don't need to convince you or anyone of anything, just sit back & watch. Talk to anyone who uses it for medicianal purposes & they'll tell you that it eases their pain, puts them on another plane. Well, duh! I think we all knew that from either trying it ourselves or talking to those that smoke it.

            Again, talk to the family of those who were killed by the wrong way driver in upstate NY. She was a mother & everyone in the van was killed including her nieces. Tell that to the husband who swore that "Not his Wife" but yet she had a mixture of alcohol & Weed in her system from smoking it a few times a week. NEED ANY MORE CONVINCING OR ARE YOU JUST TOO HARD HEADED TO SEE THE FACTS? You probably have no kids , not even married. Just wait once those loved ones of yours are placed in harms way by someone high on weed comes their way. Will you still need convincing then?

            Good luck to you.

            - speed59IE November 17, 2009 12:19PM

            Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

            • kajuroe
              What planet are u on?

              Clearly speed, you are anti marijuana no matter what. The reference you just used had a woman that crashed her car while she was drunk and happened to have traces of marijuana in her system from her occasional use. The crash was caused by the alcohol , not the weed. I challenge you to find one story where only marijuana was the cause of the fatal incident.

              I have smoked for 15 years now. I am married with 2 kids and operate a corporation as the CEO. I have friends that are engineers that smoke marijuana daily. You clearly have no idea how many Americans already smoke, or otherwise ingest marijuana on a regular basis.

              Due to your hatred towards this plant I am sure you are completely unaware of all the products that can be manufactured from it. The medical benefits of this plant are only the tip of the iceberg. The list is practically endless, so take some time and actually learn about the benefits of marijuana before spewing your narrow minded opinions.

              If you really want to see just how respected this plant once was here in the U.S. then take some time and research what the very first law regarding this plant had to say.

              - kajuroeUS November 19, 2009 8:40AM

              Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

              Thank You for your Comment

              We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

              • speed59
                Same planet as you(Unfortunately)

                You know, at first I wasn't going to waste my time with the likes of you but then it hit me: You're the CEO of a company & know engineers. I wonder if CEO of a home based envelope stuffing from your trailer actually counts & the title of engineer doesn't mean much of anything anymore these days as it is sooo overused! Please let me know the company so I & all my friends/relatives can avoid your products like Swine Flu. Hopefully, I also never use any of the products that your so-called engineers ever have to see either.
                Personally, I could care less who smokes, does what on their own time (which you missed the point entirely), I just don't believe that it should be made legal . You keep missing the fact (or ignoring) that even if it is made legal, more laws will have to be enacted just to control it and also to punish those who still grow it illegally, so where's the money generated? Anyone who even has a TRACE in their system and is driving a car would be just as guilty and DANGEROUS so what is the difference between having a TRACE & smoking 10 joints? You're logic is amazing & no matter what you are going to be Pro until it hits you right between the eyes when someone you profess to love is harmed or killed because of it. I bet that you're even against the death penalty too!

                You are in the land of eutopia if you think that all would be soo wonderful if it's made legal(never said anything about me being against using it for medicial purposes either, knucklehead). Oh wait I forgot, you are in la la land cause you smoke it!
                Oh, this only took me all of two minutes to find considering that one of the persons killed was the parent of my friend so don't tell me it doesn't do any harm;
                http://www.philly.com/philly/news/new_jersey/20091010_Driver_in_fatal_Route_38_crash_charged_with_DUI.html

                PLEASE STAY OFF THE ROADS & AWAY FROM YOUR SPOUSE/KIDS YOU LOSER!

                - speed59IE November 19, 2009 1:22PM

                Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

                Thank You for your Comment

                We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • snackle
    How Long Before The Politicians Catch Up?

    72 years ago the AMA didn't say they supported banning the substance. They actually thought the legislation was rather rash and their fears were unfounded. The entire debate on the bill lasted less than two minutes before they decided for all of America that marijuana is bad and nobody should ever have to use it. I'm glad to see the AMA coming out to publicly support the substance for its positive uses, but apparently news travels slow in Washington. Maybe we can have a highly restrictive law to somewhat legalize medical marijuana in 20 years.

    - snackleUS November 16, 2009 12:23PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...