FAIRFAX, Va. –
The National Rifle Association filed a second amended complaint in Dick
Anthony Heller et al v. District of Columbia in U.S. District Court.
NRA and other plaintiffs are asking the court to issue a preliminary
and permanent injunction to prevent the D.C. Council from implementing
laws that violate the Second Amendment and from enforcing its
prohibitions on the possession of commonly owned firearms.
Chris W. Cox, NRA chief lobbyist, said, “It's time to fully restore
the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding residents in the District of
Columbia. The D.C. Council’s latest gun registration scheme is proof of
D.C.’s continued contempt for the Supreme Court.”
NRA filed the original suit last summer after D.C. enacted a
restrictive gun registration law in response to the landmark Supreme
Court decision in the first District of Columbia v. Heller. The
historic Heller decision struck down D.C.’s long-standing ban on
handguns and self-defense in the home. The second amended complaint
challenges D.C.'s current laws, which will become permanent in early
April if not vetoed by Congress.
Under the current D.C. law, prospective gun owners are required to
pass a written test graded at the sole discretion of the Metropolitan
Police Department. They must also have vision better or equal to that
required to get a driver’s license (even for those who want to possess
a collector’s item), submit employment history for the past five years
and surrender all handguns for ballistics testing, among other
restrictions.
The current D.C. law is more stringent than California’s
draconian gun laws and bans many firearms commonly owned and used for
self-defense. Failure to satisfy these onerous requirements can result
in fines of up to $5,000 and up to five years in prison.
POST YOUR COMMENTS BELOW
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
NEWS: NRA Files 2nd Amendment Complaint in Heller v. D.C. Gun Case
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
What about Hamrick v. Obama (previously Bush)
Where is the NRA with Hamrick v. Obama (previously Bush), U.S. District Court for DC, No. 08-CV-1698-EGS (appealed to the DC Circuit) a case for national open carry handgun in intrastate, interstate, nautical, and maritime travel from a U.S. merchant seaman's point of view (the flipside to Heller)?
I have pushed my case through the federal courts since 2002 and the NRA still refuses to help me. The Open Carry Movement (www.OpenCarry.org) threatens the NRA's pet agenda for National Reciprocity for Concealed Carry. Where is the NRA on "Open Carry?"
"The problem for the gun haters, though, is that open carry horrifies many of them even more than concealed carry . This is because if the public becomes accustomed to seeing handguns on their friends' and neighbors' hips, as an everyday matter, the citizen disarmament lobby will face greater and greater difficulty in portraying the practice of private citizens carrying firearms as something sinister and a bit sordid, practiced only by a creepy, paranoid fringe. Losing the ability to demonize firearm carry is not a prospect relished by the gun prohibitionists." See "Being 'allowed' to keep a gun in the home is not enough" Kurt Hofmann, St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner, http://www.examiner.com/x-2581-St-Louis-Gun-Rights-Examiner ~y2009m3d4-Being-allowed-to-keep-a-gun-in-the-home-is-not-enough
- Don Hamrick
March 26, 2009 8:23AM
Reply to this Recommend (3)
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.