Iran Threatens U.S. After Suicide Bombing Kills 42

By Opposing Views Editorial Staff , To Protect and Serve Opposing Views - October 19, 2009

Icoemail3
Comments(44) | (0)
The head of Iran's Revolutionary Guard threatend to retaliate against the United States and Britain following a suicide bombing that killed 42 people, including 6 commanders of the Guards.

Media reports out of Iran say a Sunni Muslim group called Jundollah claimed responsibility for Sunday's attack in Sistan-Baluchestan province. But Guards commander-in-chief Mohammad Ali Jafari said Iranian security officials have documents indicating "direct ties" from Jundollah to U.S., British and, "unfortunately," Pakistani intelligence organizations, the ISNA news agency said.

"Behind this scene are the American and British intelligence apparatus, and there will have to be retaliatory measures to punish them," Jafari said.

The U.S., Britain and Pakistan have all condemned the bombing, and denied any involvement.

"We reject in the strongest terms any assertion that this attack has anything to do with Britain," said a spokeswoman at Britain's Foreign Office. "Terrorism is abhorrent wherever it occurs."

But Iran doesn't believe it. General Mohammad Pakpour, commander of the Guards' ground forces, said on Iranian television, "The base of the terrorists and rebels has not been in Iran. They are trained by America and Britain in some of the neighboring countries."

Jundollah says it is fighting to end discrimination against Sunni Muslims by Iran's dominant Shi'ites. Jundollah operates out of a Sunni area in Iran along the border with Pakistan and Afghanistan. Its leader is Abdolmalek Rigi.

"This person himself and his plans are undoubtedly under the umbrella and the protection of these (U.S., British and Pakistani) organizations," Jafari said.

The incident is threatening to raise tensions at meetings in Vienna Monday to discuss Iran's nuclear program. Analysts also fear the bombing will be used an an excuse to further clamp down on moderates opponents of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

This content is inappropriate
Loading

Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.

Explanation:


Regarding Article
NEWS:Iran Threatens U.S. After Suicide Bombing Kills 42

Thank You for your Comment

We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

  • SolarSanitizer
    War on the horizon.

    I wonder how liberals will try to pin /this/ on Bush like everything else Obama mucks up.

    - SolarSanitizerUS October 19, 2009 5:30PM

    Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

    Thank You for your Comment

    We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • dingo1
      you should apply

      With your lack of intelligence you would fit in the Obama camp... maybe as script writer!

      - dingo1 October 19, 2009 5:33PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • SolarSanitizer
        Oh, it's you.

        Your attempt to goad me into a confrontation have failed.

        Do you have any relevant commentary on the topic?

        - SolarSanitizerUS October 19, 2009 5:49PM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • Submariner
      What me Warry?

      You think we are actually behind this?

      - Submariner October 19, 2009 5:53PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • SolarSanitizer
        No. I do not.

        I think that Iran's Revolutionary Guard is behind this.

        I meant what I said, not what you seem to read into it.

        - SolarSanitizerUS October 19, 2009 5:58PM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • Submariner
          um

          Look, I know you don't like me, and all that. But you specifically brough us into this naming not one, but two US Presidents.

          "Reading into" has a connotation different from "reading", which is what I was doing...

          - Submariner October 19, 2009 8:22PM

          Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • SolarSanitizer
            You fail to see the forest due to the trees.

            I know you cannot help it, though.

            You are wrong to think I do not like you, it is your anti-social, hostile, and insulting attitude that I despise.

            P.S. I will stop replying to you in this thread the first time you insult or degrade me. So, if you want to converse, be on point.

            - SolarSanitizerUS October 19, 2009 8:44PM

            Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

            • Submariner
              Jeesh.

              If I can't be hostile, insulting and anti-social on the internet , where can I?

              :P

              So what forest? Hopefully no one with any credibility would run out and take responsibility for terrorism for the US by blaiming Bush.

              But, given our history, I think we should not blind ourself to potential undue western influence.

              There's a big difference between a previous information asset, and a paid black ops insurgent, of course.

              - Submariner October 19, 2009 8:53PM

              Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

              Thank You for your Comment

              We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

              • SolarSanitizer
                Touche :P

                Like MrBook did, you misunderstood my statement. This is because I left a little room for misunderstanding, and you found it.

                Let me rephrase:
                I wonder how liberals will try to pin /this/ on Bush [also, just] like [how he gets blamed for] everything else Obama mucks up.

                - SolarSanitizerUS October 19, 2009 10:46PM

                Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

                Thank You for your Comment

                We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

              • dingo1
                have you noticed...

                sanitarynapkin is always correct and every one else is wrong?

                And if you prove him wrong then you're an as-hole!

                - dingo1 October 20, 2009 10:28PM

                Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

                Thank You for your Comment

                We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • Submariner
          Update.

          There was a very good report on NPR today about the Revolutionary Guard.

          Apparently these guys do not answer to the government , really. They are like the Fed and the Mob combined with a paramilitary organization. They are seriously into all parts of the economy and apparently we are tailoring sanctions to weaken this strange group.

          I suppose that makes them as likely suspects as any, though it would surprise me little to learn Jundullah was being supported by the West.

          Anyway, how screwed is Iran? They got these stooges, Ayatollah's, and I'm-mad-and-I-did-a-job coming at them from 3 directions.

          Ah, mighty Persia, as good as gone as ever...

          - Submariner October 20, 2009 4:59PM

          Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • SolarSanitizer
            Do you agree

            With folks like Dr. Paul who feel that the rhetoric coming from the W.H. concerning Iran seems oddly familiar to the rhetoric which preceded our mission creep into Iraq?

            (And no, I don't mean Dubya when I say "mission creep"... It is just an unintended pun)

            - SolarSanitizerUS October 20, 2009 7:22PM

            Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

            • Submariner
              Same but different

              Hopefully there's no Ambassador/CIA agent/W.H. Stooge conspiracy involved.

              More hopefully, I hope there's no undue pressure on our intelligence communities to market a war .

              But yes, I suspect there is some agenda behind the coverage here and there.

              - Submariner October 21, 2009 12:08AM

              Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

              Thank You for your Comment

              We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

              • SolarSanitizer
                Does nationbuilding by any other name smell as sweet?

                The stage is being set. The ball is rolling.

                I might have my tinfoil hat on a little too tight here, but I think we will go to a war in Iran under Obama's watch. Likely in term 1.

                I think this because the tensions are rising at a breakneck pace, we are told that their government is invalid, they are ramping up nuclear weapon production... In fact, everything I read in the media suggests that we are supposed to fear Iran more and more and they 'must be stopped'.

                The beat of the war drum is increasing in tempo.

                - SolarSanitizerUS October 21, 2009 12:31AM

                Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

                Thank You for your Comment

                We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

    • MrBook
      muck up

      How is this a 'muck up' by President Obama?

      Does he have control over what the Jundollah does?

      - MrBookUS October 19, 2009 6:29PM

      Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

      Thank You for your Comment

      We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • SolarSanitizer
        I don't know... Does he?

        It doesn't matter if I think Obama did or didn't.

        I guess I should have added to my statement to prevent it from being twisted. Seems like I have to account for every possible misinterpretation.

        "I wonder how liberals will try to pin /this/ on Bush [also, just] like [how he gets blamed for] everything else Obama mucks up."

        So, when I see liberals blame Bush for this snafu, I'll let you know.

        - SolarSanitizerUS October 19, 2009 6:40PM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • MrBook
          clarity

          Yes that is much clearer... your original wording seemed to indicate that the bombing was the result of an action/inaction by President Obama.

          - MrBookUS October 19, 2009 6:46PM

          Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • SolarSanitizer
            I guess I assume that

            If it sounds right in my head, everyone else will understand it.

            How dare you all not think how I think. =)

            - SolarSanitizerUS October 19, 2009 6:50PM

            Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

            • MrBook
              easier

              It would be a great deal easier then wouldn't it ;-)

              - MrBookUS October 19, 2009 7:27PM

              Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

              Thank You for your Comment

              We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

      • SolarSanitizer
        It is interesting...

        As a side note, it is interesting how two liberals have found a way to misconstrue my statement, but both have refused to deny the charge.

        Very interesting....

        - SolarSanitizerUS October 19, 2009 6:43PM

        Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

        Thank You for your Comment

        We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • MrBook
          charge!

          It seems like an easy mistake to make when you consider your original statement.

          "I wonder how liberals will try to pin /this/ on Bush like everything else Obama mucks up."

          /this/ can be read in context as 'the bombing' which is what the article is about.

          'Obama mucks up' implies that President Obama was involved and that through a mistake caused the bombing.

          So far no liberals have blamed President Bush for the bombing, so there is no charge to deny...

          - MrBookUS October 19, 2009 7:07PM

          Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

            • Submariner
              You realize

              Someone somewhere is using you first post as an example of right-wing-nut-jobbery. My point is, you can always find an assinine claim from somewhere on the internet . That does not change the fact that you brought the US into this.

              Seriously, though, why do you think the Iranian's would be behind this Jundullah group? They seem more than happy to make wild accusations and threats without killing their own people, or killing their own people for causes a lot less controversial than CIA funded insurgents (to the Middle East, that is). Why would they go to this trouble?

              - Submariner October 19, 2009 8:17PM

              Reply to this Recommend (1) Icon flag

              Thank You for your Comment

              We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

              • SolarSanitizer
                Who knows?

                That is not what I was talking about. It is not really nut-jobbery when it is going on.

                Do you deny, then, that you liberals try to blame Obama's failures on Bush? Try to stay on point.

                - SolarSanitizerUS October 19, 2009 8:41PM

                Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

                Thank You for your Comment

                We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

        • Submariner
          OMG, talking about begging the question...

          It seemed like a simple question.

          If we were involved, it would predate Obama, so it would be calender definition involve the Bush regime.

          But you clearly suggested Obama mucked something up, as if you assumed the west was involved.

          - Submariner October 19, 2009 8:12PM

          Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

          Thank You for your Comment

          We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

          • SolarSanitizer
            I let my suspicions get the better of me.

            I would not be at all surprised if Obama's administration had a hand in this, no. This is because I do not trust Obama. I have read and heard too many lies and distortions from the man. Once bitten.

            (BAM! a vampire joke! )
            (And you thought I didn't)
            ( pay attention :P )

            - SolarSanitizerUS October 19, 2009 9:07PM

            Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

            Thank You for your Comment

            We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

            • Submariner
              tee hee

              A vampires, so frequent an apt metaphor.

              Newt Gingrich was once asked why we should trust politicians: "You shouldn't. You should watch us like hawks."

              As a young buck, I was impressed by this show of candor. It restated the idea the framers frequently voiced about balance of power being necessary because successful politicians are by necessity ambitious men. And I guess it reflected a rugged individualist response to modern representative democracy .

              That was last millennia though. I think this reverse psychology marketing a lot of conservative politicians rely on has come home to roost in a lot of bad ways.

              For one, why pay these guys if we can't trust them? I mean, is it so hard to isolate 0.0002% of the population that can be trusted, and that we could expect to avoid undue influence, conflict of interest, and general apathy? Why should we accept this state?

              And also, if the government just did what the people expected it to, without regard for campaigns, lobbies, and public/private complexes, it could probably do a better job than any other institution. And if so, why wouldn't we want such a government?

              Distrust should not be an option. It is regretable things have gotten this far out of hand.

              - Submariner October 20, 2009 4:12PM

              Reply to this Recommend (0) Icon flag

              Thank You for your Comment

              We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.

See Related...