Yes, There is a Future For Newspapers
The tens of millions of people newspapers reach every day and the success the industry is having in extending our audience is hardly the profile of a dying medium.
This year’s presidential election offered some stunning evidence– millions of Americans who stood in long lines after Barack Obama’s historic victory to obtain a copy of their local newspaper to commemorate the occasion. News racks were emptied, convenience store inventories were depleted and newsstands in cities big and small were “sold out.” Despite an increase in press runs for an expected surge in single-copy sales, many newspapers had to restart the presses and publish extra editions to satisfy readers. In Chicago, The Tribune printed an additional 200,000copies. Newsstands across New York City sold out of The New York Times, the Daily News and the New York Post. The Washington Post quickly sold out of its extra single copies before publishing 150,000 copies of a commemorative edition that hit the street by Wednesday afternoon.

It is a bit surprising you would point to one event several months old as the "stunning evidence" that media is not dead. Being blind to the problem is a part of the problem and is a significant contributor to members of the NAA.
Newspapers are closing, losing readers and ad revenue and market value. The fact that people in the industry are putting on a brave face is not part of the solution, it is part of the problem.
WrongQuestion.com followed up on a Howard Kurtz article in the Washington Post that discussed this very issue, you should probably read both and begin to answer different questions of your members.
The writing is on the wall...
They need to bring someone else in as an expert on the YES side, and move Kevin Fagin to the NO side. So do you want to volunteer for the task, wrongquestion?