Our lives revolve around oil. Oil brings food to our stores, comprises the fibers in our carpets and makes the plastic in our DVDs. With demand so high it’s no wonder attention has turned to supply, with some advocating the U.S. lift the ban against drilling for oil off its coasts. Is offshore oil drilling a golden opportunity, or would it only create a tidal wave of disaster?
Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about this content,
so that we can review it and determine whether it violates Civility 101 or isn't
appropriate for some other reason.
Abusing this feature is also a violation of Civility 101.
Explanation:
1
1
0
0
0
1
Biweekly updates on new debates and experts
Please check your email to confirm your subscription.
© 2008 Opposing Views, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Opposing Views, Inc. is not responsible for the content posted on this website. Please view full disclaimer under Terms
We Need Clean Energy Solutions That Benefit All Americans
- From Sierra Club
By Sierra Club - Explore, Enjoy and Protect the Planet
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
Creative Thinking
I have been opposed to expanded offshore drilling on the grounds that it won't lower gas prices. But there's an interesting piece in today's (9/15/08) New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/opinion/15hahn.html , arguing that the royalties and tax revenue generated from developing offshore fields (and ANWR) could run into the hundreds of billions. That's of benefit to the US, even if gas prices remain completely unaffected. The authors go on to suggest that a political deal could be struck, involving investment in alternative energy, protection of other wilderness areas, etc.
The world is going to keep consuming oil until it's gone or it's uneconomical to extract it. Doesn't it make sense to capture some of the economic benefit of that for the US economy, especially if some of those economic benefits can - via political compromise - by invested in other environmentally friendly programs that could potentially far outweigh any degradation caused by drilling?
- dmonasg September 15, 2008 10:50AM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Uncommitted
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.
The True Beginning
OUR CARS WON'T RUN ON WIND OR SOLAR POWER YET!!!
Actually, what got us into being so dependent on oil started long before the government had anything to do with it. The steam engine that ran on coal was more of a beginning to our oil and other not so renewable fossil fuel problem. When Henry Ford's assembly line started up making the new hot item on the market, we got hooked on the much loved and addictive oil. Thomas Edison, among others, were trying to invent an electric car at the time when cars were just catching on. However, by the time Edison got his electric car perfected (for the time), it was already about five years into our addiction. Edison's electric car did not catch on because Americans were not willing to sacrifice their faster combustion engines for Edison's slightly slower, more economically friendly electric engine. If Edison had just perfected his electric car a few years sooner, then we might not be struggling to live a more oil-free life today.
However, we still don't want to have our worlds completely rocked by having to change our pace of life to fit our slower energy source. It would change everything. So, that is why we must stick with finding more oil until we can find a cleaner energy source that is just as efficient.
- kirbi
February 11, 2009 5:34PM
Reply to this Recommend (0)
Side: Yes
Thank You for your Comment
We review all comments before they're posted. For more on our comment policy, please see our FAQ.